The Docket

  • MONDAY:

    The Scribbler

    James Lincoln Warren

  • MONDAY:

    Spirit of the Law

    Janice Law

  • TUESDAY:

    High-Heeled Gumshoe

    Melodie Johnson Howe

  • WEDNESDAY:

    Tune It Or Die!

    Robert Lopresti

  • THURSDAY:

    Femme Fatale

    Deborah
    Elliott-Upton

  • FRIDAY:

    Bander- snatches

    Steven Steinbock

  • SATURDAY:

    Mississippi Mud

    John M. Floyd

  • SATURDAY:

    New York Minute

    Angela Zeman

  • SUNDAY:

    The A.D.D. Detective

    Leigh Lundin

  • AD HOC:

    Mystery Masterclass

    Distinguished Guest Contributors

  • AD HOC:

    Surprise Witness

    Guest Blogger

  • Aural Argument

    "The Sack 'Em Up Men"

    "Crow's Avenue"

    "The Stain"

    "Jumpin' Jack Flash"

    "The Art of the Short Story"

    "Bouchercon 2010 Short Story Panel"

Sunday, 27 July: The A.D.D. Detective

NUMB3RS, Part 2: LIKE TOTALLY

by Leigh Lundin

Fido

A few months ago, a reader sent me an on-line puzzle and asked how it worked. I did a step-by-step explication of that little mystery at the time. Recently another reader, Wendy, sent in an on-line puzzle.Fido

This one, called Fido, has a higher level of sophistication, based upon a couple of nearly forgotten mathematical principles. First, try the Fido puzzle and return here to discover the secret of its inner workings.

If you want to find out how it’s done, keep reading. If you don’t, skip to How Old Is Your Brain? below for a different kind of challenge.

The Trick Revealed

Following, I’ll lay out how it’s done along with a little (very little) math, so feel free to jump to the next test below.

Scholarly non-mystic numerologists study historical, usually religious texts, often related to gnostic studies. The Qur’an is one such fascinating subject of study. No one’s certain of the meaning of its occurences, but the gematrical number 19 apppears imbedded in multiple ways.

Once upon a time, a girlfriend asked me to take a look at numerology. There’s at least a dozen flavors, each in conflict with the others. The most popular are Kabbalah and Greek (raising the question of transliteration of non-Roman alphabets).

Most forms of mystic numerology rely upon "fadic addition" or "sum-of-the-digits", to obtain a single digit. The Fido trick also relies on ‘fadic addition’.

James managed to track down a possible etymology for ‘fadic‘, conceivably from an old English word faed, meaning "to reduce". I can think of two practical applications of fadic addition.

My good friend Dr. Ray reminded me of casting out nines this evening as we discussed the article. For centuries, a method called "casting out nines" was used to double-check math results in the days before computers. Largely forgotten today, engineers and accountants once used check digits to determine if they might have an error in extended calculations.

Check digits are also used to check the validity of account numbers, such as bank checking accounts. These days, banks usually use a more sophisticated calculation, but the idea is the same. You’ll find check digits on bar codes and the end of ISBN numbers.

Calculating a fadic sum is simple in a shampoo-rinse-repeat way:

  1. Add all the individual digits in a number.
  2. If the result has more than one digit, repeat step (1) using the result as the new number, until you’ve reduced everything to one digit.

For example, say your numerology ‘number’ of a birthday is 19741205. You add all the digits together and you get 29. Add 2+9 together and you get 11. Add those digits, 1+1 together, and you get 2. The number 2 is your fadic sum.

What does this have to do with Wendy’s magical sleight of hand?

Fido uses a couple of mathematical tricks based upon fadic addition, which we’ll notate as ƒ(). Notice that Fido makes no attempt to guess any part of your original number, only a digit it has you devise.

  1. The Fido program has you perform a transformation that it can work with, resulting in a fadic sum of 9. It does this by having you take your original number, rearrange the digits into a second number, and subtract one from the other. This difference, related to "casting out nines" above, will be used in the following step. Experiment with any two or more digit number, scramble the digits and subtract it from the original, and you’ll always get a fadic sum of 9.
  2. Since the program knows the difference results in a sum-of-the-digits of 9, once you ‘hide’ any one digit, it simply subtracts the sum of the digits you provided it from 9, revealing the number you circled.

Say you select 97531 and in rearranging the numbers, let’s simply reverse them, 13579. Subtracting the smaller from the larger, we get 83952. The fadic sum of this difference is, ƒ(83952)=27, ƒ(27)=9.

Now, get rid of one digit, say 5. The fadic sum of this number is ƒ(8392)=22, ƒ(22)=4. To find our missing digit, we subtract, 9-4=5.

That was fun, wasn’t it. (Don’t answer that!)

How Old Is Your Brain?

The following, from another reader, Sheena, purports to determine your mental age. To try it, use these steps:

1. Click the BRAIN TEST.
2. Click on START:
3. Wait for the countdown of 3, 2, 1.
4. Memorize each number’s position on the screen:
5. After a moment, you’ll be presented with a number of circles.
6.
Click each circle in order from the smalles number to the biggest number:
7. At the end of test, the computer provides a guess of your age. Remember, this is someone’s opinion, not necessarily a reflection of reality.

Thanks to Wendy for the Fido puzzle, Sheena for the Brain Test, Dr. Ray Ferguson for casting out nines, and James Lincoln Warren for digging out etymology of the word fadic.

Posted in The A.D.D. Detective on July 27th, 2008
RSS 2.0 Both comments and pings are currently closed.

4 comments

  1. July 27th, 2008 at 5:14 am, sheena Says:

    “Casting out nines”, as an accountant, I still use it to this day.

    Interesting piece, so much for the mystery of numbers.

  2. July 27th, 2008 at 10:32 am, JLW Says:

    I do not consider the etymology of “fadic” to be at all reliable—for one thing, I can find no such word as “faed” in Old English. For another, as far as I can tell, “fadic” only occurs in a numerological context. It is not included in the Oxford English Dictionary.

    It also seems to me unlikely in the extreme that numerology would have interested the Anglo-Saxons much, since they were mostly concerned with smiting foes and quaffing mead.

  3. July 27th, 2008 at 5:19 pm, alisa Says:

    Excuse me, do you have a calculator I could borrow?? 🙂

  4. July 27th, 2008 at 6:41 pm, Leigh Says:

    Late yesterday afternoon while I was working on the article, I glanced outside my patio door and thought a cat had died on my threshold. It turned out to be a sleeping puppy, perhaps a King Charles Spaniel. Although stinky, it was well-fed but heat-exhausted.

    A couple of my neighbors have pugs and I asked if they’d check if anyone was missing a puppy. I’m in a cul-de-sac on a dead-end street, so it can’t have traveled far. One of the neighbor ladies ducked out and bought puppy food and toys for it.

    My cockatoo doesn’t quite know what to make of her. The puppy squeaks one of its toys and then howls. Valentine thinks if he isn’t allowed to squawk no one else should either.

    Steve’s girlfriend Sharon not only came up with the spaniel ID, but suggested the name Aggie, short for Agatha, and you can guess where that came from.

« Saturday, July 26: Mississippi Mud Monday, July 28: The Scribbler »

The Sidebar

  • Lex Artis

      Crippen & Landru
      Futures Mystery   Anthology   Magazine
      Homeville
      The Mystery   Place
      Short Mystery   Fiction Society
      The Strand   Magazine
  • Amicae Curiae

      J.F. Benedetto
      Jan Burke
      Bill Crider
      CrimeSpace
      Dave's Fiction   Warehouse
      Emerald City
      Martin Edwards
      The Gumshoe Site
      Michael Haskins
      _holm
      Killer Hobbies
      Miss Begotten
      Murderati
      Murderous Musings
      Mysterious   Issues
      MWA
      The Rap Sheet
      Sandra Seamans
      Sweet Home   Alameda
      Women of   Mystery
      Louis Willis
  • Filed Briefs

    • Bandersnatches (226)
    • De Novo Review (10)
    • Femme Fatale (224)
    • From the Gallery (3)
    • High-Heeled Gumshoe (151)
    • Miscellany (2)
    • Mississippi Mud (192)
    • Mystery Masterclass (91)
    • New York Minute (21)
    • Spirit of the Law (18)
    • Surprise Witness (46)
    • The A.D.D. Detective (228)
    • The Scribbler (204)
    • Tune It Or Die! (224)
  • Legal Archives

    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
Criminal Brief: The Mystery Short Story Web Log Project - Copyright 2011 by the respective authors. All rights reserved.
Opinions expressed are solely those of the author expressing them, and do not reflect the positions of CriminalBrief.com.