The Docket

  • MONDAY:

    The Scribbler

    James Lincoln Warren

  • MONDAY:

    Spirit of the Law

    Janice Law

  • TUESDAY:

    High-Heeled Gumshoe

    Melodie Johnson Howe

  • WEDNESDAY:

    Tune It Or Die!

    Robert Lopresti

  • THURSDAY:

    Femme Fatale

    Deborah
    Elliott-Upton

  • FRIDAY:

    Bander- snatches

    Steven Steinbock

  • SATURDAY:

    Mississippi Mud

    John M. Floyd

  • SATURDAY:

    New York Minute

    Angela Zeman

  • SUNDAY:

    The A.D.D. Detective

    Leigh Lundin

  • AD HOC:

    Mystery Masterclass

    Distinguished Guest Contributors

  • AD HOC:

    Surprise Witness

    Guest Blogger

  • Aural Argument

    "The Sack 'Em Up Men"

    "Crow's Avenue"

    "The Stain"

    "Jumpin' Jack Flash"

    "The Art of the Short Story"

    "Bouchercon 2010 Short Story Panel"

Monday, December 28: The Scribbler

ANNOUNCING
OUR CHRISTMAS CONTEST WINNERS

SPOILER ALERT: One of the descriptions below of the solutions submitted by the winners contains the answer to the puzzle. If you are following Leigh’s columns for this and next week describing the evolution of the puzzle and how it can be solved, and do not want to know the answer before he reveals it, or for some masochistic reason are still trying to solve it yourself, you may want to skip them and read only the parts in boldface.

First Prize: C. J. Dowse of Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal
Province, Republic of South Africa

C.J. correctly deduced that the puzzle was a lipogram, determined that the missing letter was “L”, and deciphered the Christmas Message as “No L” = “Noël”. C.J. was the only entrant to solve the complete puzzle.

Second Prize: Jeff Baker of Wichita, Kansas, USA

Jeff correctly deduced that the puzzle was a lipogram, as he very shrewdly hinted in his pair of limericks in the Comments for Tuesday, December 15, but didn’t manage to identify which letter was missing.

Third Prize: Cindy Kerschner of Schnecksville, Pennsylvania, USA

Cindy correctly deduced that the answer was a French phrase, but my hint from “Silver Blaze” turned out to be something of a stray dog in her case—she thought there must be a canine connection.

Congratulations to our Winners! Well done!

And now return to our regularly scheduled column. We join my friend Wolpertinger the Mad Scientist’s work in progress.

WOLPERTINGER’S SOCKS

by James Lincoln Warren

Jakob Linnaeus Wolpertinger looked over his steepled fingers and snorted. “For too long have these so-called ‘scientists’ been devoting their attentions to the most trivial of problems at the highest of costs. Super-colliders and orbiting telescopes! It’s absurd, when the mysteries of the universe veritably display themselves at the tips of our own noses.”

“So you’ve been working on that paper-clip nasal-passage-opener anti-snoring thingy again?” Ivor, his cyphotic minion, asked.

“No, vile cretin,” Wolpertinger said angrily, his wiry frame unfolding like a spring on a music-box lid, the kind that you open by pressing a button to hear it play “Lara’s Theme” from “Dr. Zhivago” or maybe Brahms’ Lullabye and suchlike, launching him out of the sagging wing chair in which he had been sitting.

“I have been staring into the heart of the abyss itself, pondering the fundamental mysteries. I have been studying . . . the Sock Problem!”

“The Sock Problem. Ohh-kay.”

Wolpertinger seized his too-long hair in his left fist, the whites of his eyes showing above his dilated pupils, and his irises, too, come to that. “Yes, the Sock Problem, blithering imbecile. Suppose it’s dark and you can’t turn the light on to retrieve a pair of socks from your dresser drawer—”

“Why can’t you turn on the light?”

“Because it could wake the missus.”

“You’re not even married—engaged for the last twenty-four years, all right, but how long are you going to string that poor girl along, anyway? Wait a minute. I get it—you maxed out the electric bill with all your stupid experiments and Edison cut off our power again, right?”

“Never mind, drooling ignoramus. I will patiently explain. You have three pairs of black socks and four pairs of white socks, all of which are loose in the sock drawer. How many socks do you have to remove to ensure you get a pair the same color? That’s the Sock Problem in its most elementary configuration.”

“Three.”

“You’re wrong, ignorant vandal. It takes three! Any idiot can see that. But suppose you need to get a pair of white socks. Eh? What then?”

“Eight, in case the first six are all black.”

“The answer is eight—in case the first six are all black, foolish lout. What do you say now?”

“I suppose you’re going to tell me that this is an application of information theory, that taking socks from the drawer can be expressed as a binary string of length n bits, where the entropy of the string can be expressed as H = -[p log p + (1 – p) log (1 – p)], where H is the average information content and p is the probability of drawing either a black or white sock through an iteration of m possible choices, and is equal to -(p1 log p1 + p2 log p2 + … + pm log pm). But this is trivial. What has it got to do with writing mystery stories? And I note that you have on one blue sock and one grey argyle.”

“I was getting to that!”

“Well, I’m waiting.”

“It’s all Steinbock’s fault, you know.”

“How so?”

“He’s the one who bought up this whole topic of randomness. There is nothing less random than story telling, which adheres to a story-teller’s fixed plan, or at least starts out that way. But a story, especially if it involves the solution to a mystery, must have the appearance of randomness, of entropy, of hidden information. And that’s why I have been thinking about the curious incident of the socks in the night-time.”

“You’re too clever by half. And Socks is a cat’s name, anyway. Aren’t you worried about appearing too contrived? The deus ex machina effect?”

Wolpertinger smirked with self-satisfaction. “Not a bit—not if the contrivance isn’t revealed until the end, and isn’t entirely gratuitous. That’s when the entropy is exhausted anyway, because all has been revealed.”

“Yeah, right. Just remember what happened the last time you tried to sew something together from different parts. Home Depot sold out of resin torches in less than half an hour and the locals stormed the castle. But all this palavering has made me thirsty. I’m going out for a beer. They’ve got this beautiful new gypsy barmaid down at the pub, and that ain’t remotely your random event, Doc. I’m pretty sure Warren planned it all along.”

“Vulgar blackguard!”

“Oh, please.”

Posted in The Scribbler on December 28th, 2009
RSS 2.0 Both comments and pings are currently closed.

9 comments

  1. December 28th, 2009 at 9:11 am, Rob Lopresti Says:

    I prefer a music box to play Fur Elise so clearly this column does not apply to me. And my black socks feel quite different from my white socks.

    But the information theory bit reminded me of a magical trick/mathematical puzzle that I read years ago and mostly forgot. Perhaps James of Steven can remind me? As I recall it went like this: Deal any five random cards and person X can arrange 4 of them in such an order as to show person Y the identity of the fifth card. The article I read said that it defied conventional information theory because it transferred more info than those four cards would be expected to contain. This ring any bells?

  2. December 28th, 2009 at 4:49 pm, Angela Zeman Says:

    Congratulations to winner C. J. Dowse for a great piece of detective work! My admiration would no doubt be shared by Sherlock and Hercule, if they could’ve joined us today!

    Also Jeff and Cindy–so close. And for this puzzle, ‘close’ is quite an achievement. Congratulations to all!

    Leigh, your brain works in diabolical ways.

    Happy New Year to everyone!

  3. December 28th, 2009 at 5:27 pm, John Floyd Says:

    I’d like to add my congratulations to the winners of the contest. Hope you had as much fun with this as we did!

  4. December 28th, 2009 at 6:26 pm, JLW Says:

    As I recall it went like this: Deal any five random cards and person X can arrange 4 of them in such an order as to show person Y the identity of the fifth card.

    This would be an enviable skill to have in a game of five card stud poker. Steve McQueen might have beat Edward G. Robinson after all.

  5. December 28th, 2009 at 6:44 pm, John Floyd Says:

    I sure wanted McQueen to beat him, JLW. But, in Edward G.’s words: “You’re good, kid, but as long as I’m around you’re second best.”

    I think you and I watch too many movies . . .

  6. December 28th, 2009 at 8:37 pm, A broad broad abroad Says:

    What an exercise in discipline! Well done to all at CB – a wonderful idea, brilliantly executed!

    My thanks for your generosity of spirit – this took a great deal of planning, time and effort – please know it is much appreciated.

    After all my research, am now qualified to offer season’s greetings in umpteen languages, though my Sanskrit is still rusty. Forgotten the words or tunes to any carols? Give me a shout.

    Probably a little late to mention now, but I’d have played for the sheer enjoyment, so to win a prize – and such a unique one – is a bonus.

    With every good wish for the New Year to you and yours
    Grateful thanks
    CJ

  7. December 29th, 2009 at 1:50 am, Jeff Baker Says:

    Wow! Thanks so much! I was close but not quite close enough! Thanks everybody! (Hey, a column or two on how you managed the clues in the columns might be interesting!)

  8. December 30th, 2009 at 8:34 am, Leigh Says:

    Jeff, more is coming up.

    I echo my friends and colleagues in congratulations the winners!

  9. December 31st, 2009 at 4:57 am, Jeff Baker Says:

    Thanks so much! (From me and the L’vs!)
    —-jeff

« Sunday, December 27: The A.D.D. Detective Tuesday, December 29: Surprise Witness »

The Sidebar

  • Lex Artis

      Crippen & Landru
      Futures Mystery   Anthology   Magazine
      Homeville
      The Mystery   Place
      Short Mystery   Fiction Society
      The Strand   Magazine
  • Amicae Curiae

      J.F. Benedetto
      Jan Burke
      Bill Crider
      CrimeSpace
      Dave's Fiction   Warehouse
      Emerald City
      Martin Edwards
      The Gumshoe Site
      Michael Haskins
      _holm
      Killer Hobbies
      Miss Begotten
      Murderati
      Murderous Musings
      Mysterious   Issues
      MWA
      The Rap Sheet
      Sandra Seamans
      Sweet Home   Alameda
      Women of   Mystery
      Louis Willis
  • Filed Briefs

    • Bandersnatches (226)
    • De Novo Review (10)
    • Femme Fatale (224)
    • From the Gallery (3)
    • High-Heeled Gumshoe (151)
    • Miscellany (2)
    • Mississippi Mud (192)
    • Mystery Masterclass (91)
    • New York Minute (21)
    • Spirit of the Law (18)
    • Surprise Witness (46)
    • The A.D.D. Detective (228)
    • The Scribbler (204)
    • Tune It Or Die! (224)
  • Legal Archives

    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
Criminal Brief: The Mystery Short Story Web Log Project - Copyright 2011 by the respective authors. All rights reserved.
Opinions expressed are solely those of the author expressing them, and do not reflect the positions of CriminalBrief.com.