Friday, January 29: Bandersnatches
CEREAL MURDERS
by Steve Steinbock
Some very good novels – and even a few short stories – have been written about serial killers. It’s a subgenre that’s been done, done well, and sadly overdone. I’m not going to talk about that kind of serial killing this week. I’ve had a few interesting reading experiences in the last few months that take a different twists on the term “serial.”
Mr. Monk in Trouble
The USA Network series about the lovable obsessive compulsive detective has come to the end of its eight-year run. But writer Lee Goldberg still has a few more “Monk” stories in him. I haven’t read a lot of tie-in novels, but I think this one’s worthwhile for a couple reasons:
- Lee Goldberg is a good writer.
- The series hero Adrian Monk, and his “Watson” caregiver Natalie Teeger, are very endearing characters. (Die-hard fans of the show should remember that nit-picking the discrepancies between small-screen and printed-page is a symptom of OCD).
- The book features “tuckerized” references to several people in the mystery and western community, often with their names twisted around and swapped. There’s an underling cop deputy named “Billy Crider,” a museum director named “Edward Randisi” and an auto mechanic named “Bob Gorman,” and several others.
But what makes Mr. Monk in Trouble especially relevant to short story lovers is the way Goldberg incorporates several shorter stories into the novel. EQMM readers may recall Goldberg’s story, “Mr. Monk and the Piss Poor Gold,” from the November, 2009 issue. That story featured a character named “Artemus Monk,” an assayer of precious metals during the Gold Rush, and who is probably Adrian Monk’s ancestor. During Mr. Monk in Trouble, Monk’s nurse/assistant Natalie Teeger (she’s not really a nurse, but she may as well be for all she does for her needy boss) discovers a book – the journals of a 19th century widow who served as Artemus Monk’s assistant. As Natalie reads through the book, she finds startling parallels between her own boss and the Gold Rush assayer. Mr. Monk in Trouble is peppered with five or so selections from the old journal, and the book-within-the-book serves as a useful counterpoint to the modern mystery.
The Deaver List
The Watchlist, a pair of collaborative novellas by members of International Thriller Writers, gets a mixed review – a snicker snack as it were – from my Vorpal Blade. I’ve long been an admirer of Deaver’s writing, in fact I’ve been reading him since the time when he still included his middle name in his byline. Deaver is a successful novelist, but is, in my opinion, one of the great short story writers of crime fiction around today.
Deaver pulled together a team of writers, all members of International Thriller Writers, to play a game of literary tag-team. Both short novels feature former War Crimes investigator Harold Middleton – now a collector and authenticator of musical manuscripts. The first novella, The Chopin Manuscript works pretty well. It features chapters by David Hewson, S.J. Rozan, Lisa Scottoline, Lee Child, and ten others. The second piece, The Copper Bracelet, comes off more of a mishmash despite its high caliber team of contributors (Gayle Lynds, Brett Battles, Lisa Barnes, and others). As I was reading the second half, I had the sense that many of the writers hadn’t bothered to keep track of what their predecessors had written. Characters changed while others were forgotten. Plot threats unraveled.
Still, the book is worth it for the first half and as a showcase of a lot of talent, including many for whom short fiction is a foreign art.
Philatelist for Hire
When people ask about my favorite writers, the two names that always come up are Fredric Brown and Lawrence Block. I’ve written about Brown before, in fact I credit him (and Lewis Carroll) with the title of my weekly blog column. But Block has given me more reading pleasure than any writer, living or dead. He’s a master of the short story as well as the novel. He writes humorous mysteries as well as some of the most gut-wrenching dark crime novels of our time.
A dozen years back I asked Block to sign a few books for me. One was Tanner on Ice, about a sleep-deprived spy who finally falls asleep. The other was Hit Man, the first collection of short stories about a killer-for-hire with a conscience and a penchant for collecting stamps. Larry asked if I wanted them personalized, and on a whim (I’ve done it several times since) I asked him to sign one for each of my two sons. When I told him their ages (they were one and four at the time) Larry gave me a reproachful scowl. But he signed them anyway.
My son Sam, who was just a baby when Larry signed Hit Man for him, just turned 13. He decided he wanted to read the book. Negligent parent that I am, I allowed it. Sam loved the book. “Man, Dad,” he told me several times during the five nights it took him to read it, “This guy really writes!” I asked Sam to clarify what he liked about the book and the author. “He writes like no one I’ve never read before. He’s funny and smart at the same time. He uses words that you don’t normally see and some of the things he writes make me just go ‘wow!’”
From the mouths of babes. Or thirteen-year-old boys, anyway. Hit Man, for those of you who haven’t read it, collected ten of Block’s stories about Keller. The stories flow well as a novel of sorts. Sam is happy to know that there are three more books about Keller, plus more than fifty other Block titles on my shelves.
Your sons will grow up to be readers, I’m sure! And I have the Goldberg book. (Oddly enough I’ve never actually watched Monk…)
I just read HIT AND RUN, the latest book about Keller. It’s impossible not to compare/contrast him to Stark’s Parker, another highly successful criminal. Keller is a lot more thoughtful, a bit easy-going compared to the tightly wrapped Parker. I wouldn’t want to meet either one in a dark alley.
And I don’t enjoy Keller nearly as much as Block’s other heroes, Scudder and Rhodenbarr.
Jeff, you don’t have to be familiar with the TV program to appreciate the book. Bill Crider has told me that he’s never seen it, but has read and loved all the books.
(Having said that, I happen to like the show. Tony Shalhoub is great, as is (was) the supporting cast).
Rob, I agree that it’s hard not to compare Keller to Parker, or to Max Allan Collins’ character “Quarry.” But for me, not to take anything away from Collins or Westlake, Block has a style and a sense of character that is totally endearing – even when applied to a hit man.
Following up and clarifying my last comment: Rob used the name “Stark” while I used the name “Westlake.” If I confused anyone, they’re the same person. Donald Westlake wrote the “Parker” caper novels under the name Richard Stark.
And while we’re rating Block’s characters, I’m partial to Bernie Rhodenbarr myself. But I read and enjoy all his series characters: Matthew Scudder, Evan Tanner (a spy who can’t sleep), Chip Harrison (a randy young man whom I mentioned in a comment on Rob’s column this week), and even the sleezy and unscrupulous attorney Martin Ehrengraf.
I love Monk and wish I’d created him.
I actually have the book “Mr. Monk in Trouble” (It’s a present for someone else!) and intend to read it. A ton of friends of mine have reccomended watching the show! Time to get the DVDs!