The Docket

  • MONDAY:

    The Scribbler

    James Lincoln Warren

  • MONDAY:

    Spirit of the Law

    Janice Law

  • TUESDAY:

    High-Heeled Gumshoe

    Melodie Johnson Howe

  • WEDNESDAY:

    Tune It Or Die!

    Robert Lopresti

  • THURSDAY:

    Femme Fatale

    Deborah
    Elliott-Upton

  • FRIDAY:

    Bander- snatches

    Steven Steinbock

  • SATURDAY:

    Mississippi Mud

    John M. Floyd

  • SATURDAY:

    New York Minute

    Angela Zeman

  • SUNDAY:

    The A.D.D. Detective

    Leigh Lundin

  • AD HOC:

    Mystery Masterclass

    Distinguished Guest Contributors

  • AD HOC:

    Surprise Witness

    Guest Blogger

  • Aural Argument

    "The Sack 'Em Up Men"

    "Crow's Avenue"

    "The Stain"

    "Jumpin' Jack Flash"

    "The Art of the Short Story"

    "Bouchercon 2010 Short Story Panel"

Friday, February 5: Bandersnatches

TWO-FACED

by Steve Steinbock

One of the earliest aphorisms I ever remember learning as a small child is “Look Both Ways Before Crossing.” Is that an aphorism? Perhaps it’s more of a dictum. But I like the word aphorism better. “Look Both Ways” can be applied to all sorts of experiences, not just crossing streets. It could be interpreted as a reminder to weigh all options, to hear all opinions, to examine all evidence, or to read all definitions. It could be interpreted these ways, but it normally isn’t.

The expression is very specific about the number of ways one should look before crossing. It doesn’t say “Look all ways” or “Look every way” or “Look three ways.” It always says “Look both ways.” So it seems pretty specific to looking both ways along a road before stepping off the curb. Perhaps that’s why Janus, the two-faced Roman god, is the deity of doorways, gates, beginnings, and endings. According to myth, the god Saturn gave Janus the ability to see both past and future, which is probably why we name the first month of the year “January.”

About a decade back the wordsmith Richard Lederer invoked Janus when describing contranyms (also known as auto-antonyms. These are words that can mean their opposites. When we encounter these words, we really have to look both ways. Speaking of looking, perhaps one of the best examples of a contranym is the word oversight, which means both “supervision; watchful care” and “omission or error due to carelessness.” In other words, the purpose of “Oversight” is to prevent oversight.

When my parents were really angry but didn’t want to cuss, they often said, “God bless it!” I think they thought it was more polite or acceptable than saying “God damn it” but it came out just as nasty. It turns out that this use of “blessing” goes way back. Even the Bible occasionally uses the term “bless” euphemistically when it really means “curse.”

On the subject of religious contranyms, there’s the word sanction, which can mean to permit something or to censure – or not permit – something.

A few other interesting contranyms:

To cleave means both to attach to something or to split something in half.

When you buckle your shoes or your belt, you’re making them tight. But when your knees buckle they become loose and wobbly.

Similarly, to bolt means both the fasten something, or to run away.

To clip means either to cut something our or off (like newspaper clippings or nail clippings) or to attach things (like what a paper-clip does).

The words fast, bound, and pitch can all refer either to make something stay in place (pitching a tent; binding something fast), or to make or describe something in motion (he threw a fast pitch but the man on third was bound for home).

As some of you know, I review audiobooks. One jarring error that I’ve heard a number of narrators make is to pronounce the word “secreted” as though it were the passive form of secrete (to ooze out, as in a secretion) when the author intended it as the passive form of secret (to cause something to be hidden, in other words to make sure it doesn’t ooze out).

It’s funny that the verbs skin, seed, and core refer to removing the skin, seeds, or core of a food product. I guess it would be pretty hard to put them back on.

When you wind up a toy, you make it start. If you get me all wound up I might find it hard to stop. So as I wind up this column, I make it end. So in the spirit of Janus, the god of beginnings and endings, I bid you to look both ways before crossing and I’ll see you back here next Friday.

Posted in Bandersnatches on February 5th, 2010
RSS 2.0 Both comments and pings are currently closed.

2 comments

  1. February 5th, 2010 at 4:27 pm, Steve Steinbock Says:

    The simple explanation for the opposite meanings of oversight: it is the nominal form of two different verbs:

    overlook and oversee.

    But that brings up a different problem: the noun overlook refers to a cliff or other high spot that affords scenic vistas. (Michael Connolly used this as a title for his 2007 novel). So from an overlook you’re unlikely to overlook anything.

  2. February 5th, 2010 at 10:00 pm, JLW Says:

    One jarring error that I’ve heard a number of narrators make is to pronounce the word “secreted” as though it were the passive form of secrete …

    Words like this are called homographs, meaning that they are spelled the same but pronounced differently. Sometimes they are closely related, as with “consummate” (i.e., verb meaning to bring to completion, pronounced CON-sue-mate), and “consummate” (i.e., adjective meaning in a state of perfection, correctly pronounced con-SUMM-uht). At other times they have completely different etymologies, as with “desert” (i.e., deserving, pronounced duh-ZERT) and “desert” (i.e., a desolate wilderness, pronounced DEZ-urt).

    I’d like to see you tackle that subject, too, Steve.

« Thursday, February 4: Femme Fatale Saturday, February 6: Mississippi Mud »

The Sidebar

  • Lex Artis

      Crippen & Landru
      Futures Mystery   Anthology   Magazine
      Homeville
      The Mystery   Place
      Short Mystery   Fiction Society
      The Strand   Magazine
  • Amicae Curiae

      J.F. Benedetto
      Jan Burke
      Bill Crider
      CrimeSpace
      Dave's Fiction   Warehouse
      Emerald City
      Martin Edwards
      The Gumshoe Site
      Michael Haskins
      _holm
      Killer Hobbies
      Miss Begotten
      Murderati
      Murderous Musings
      Mysterious   Issues
      MWA
      The Rap Sheet
      Sandra Seamans
      Sweet Home   Alameda
      Women of   Mystery
      Louis Willis
  • Filed Briefs

    • Bandersnatches (226)
    • De Novo Review (10)
    • Femme Fatale (224)
    • From the Gallery (3)
    • High-Heeled Gumshoe (151)
    • Miscellany (2)
    • Mississippi Mud (192)
    • Mystery Masterclass (91)
    • New York Minute (21)
    • Spirit of the Law (18)
    • Surprise Witness (46)
    • The A.D.D. Detective (228)
    • The Scribbler (204)
    • Tune It Or Die! (224)
  • Legal Archives

    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
Criminal Brief: The Mystery Short Story Web Log Project - Copyright 2011 by the respective authors. All rights reserved.
Opinions expressed are solely those of the author expressing them, and do not reflect the positions of CriminalBrief.com.