The Docket

  • MONDAY:

    The Scribbler

    James Lincoln Warren

  • MONDAY:

    Spirit of the Law

    Janice Law

  • TUESDAY:

    High-Heeled Gumshoe

    Melodie Johnson Howe

  • WEDNESDAY:

    Tune It Or Die!

    Robert Lopresti

  • THURSDAY:

    Femme Fatale

    Deborah
    Elliott-Upton

  • FRIDAY:

    Bander- snatches

    Steven Steinbock

  • SATURDAY:

    Mississippi Mud

    John M. Floyd

  • SATURDAY:

    New York Minute

    Angela Zeman

  • SUNDAY:

    The A.D.D. Detective

    Leigh Lundin

  • AD HOC:

    Mystery Masterclass

    Distinguished Guest Contributors

  • AD HOC:

    Surprise Witness

    Guest Blogger

  • Aural Argument

    "The Sack 'Em Up Men"

    "Crow's Avenue"

    "The Stain"

    "Jumpin' Jack Flash"

    "The Art of the Short Story"

    "Bouchercon 2010 Short Story Panel"

Saturday, February 20: Mississippi Mud

WRITE WHAT YOU LIKE

by John M. Floyd

Throughout the sixteen years of my so-called career as a writer, one of the pieces of advice I’ve heard most often is write what you know. And I agree with that, at least in theory. The more familiar you are with a subject, the more believable you’re likely to be. I’m sure one reason John Grisham’s novels are successful is the time he spent working in the same field as many of his characters, and the same might be said of Robin Cook, Kathy Reichs, Joseph Wambaugh, Dick Francis, and many others.

But I don’t think writers should feel bound to the “write what you know” rule. I believe a much better version of that advice is: write what you like to write, and what you like to read, and what you feel comfortable writing. In my opinion, good fiction is a product more of imagination than personal experience. Remember, Tom Clancy was an insurance salesman; he never even served in the military. And Rob mentioned in his column a few weeks ago the German author Karl May, who wrote most of his stories about the riproaring Old West but never set foot there.

The Walter Mitty syndrome

The problem with writing only about what you know is that many of us haven’t lived lives that are interesting or exciting enough to sustain a piece of fiction, and certainly a piece of suspense fiction. Maybe that’s what drove Clancy and May to stretch their horizons a bit. Marie Anderson once said, in an article for The Writer, “I used to write what I know. I used to write about infertility, motherhood, suburban middle-class life, blue-collar Catholic childhood, law school from a dropout’s perspective. I’d send out those stories and never see them again, not even the SASEs. Then, somewhere, I came across a better rule: Know what you write.”

What kinds of things do I know, to write about? Well, I’m pretty familiar with the South, and marriage and parenthood, and certain hobbies and sports, and the Air Force and IBM and some areas of computer technology. And my travels in the military and with my job have helped a little, I suppose. But the truth is, I’ve probably written more fiction about places I haven’t visited than those I have, and I’ve written relatively few stories that deal with familiar career subjects like financial applications and software design. What I do do, now and then, is start a story with something that I know and then detour into areas a little more foreign — and almost certainly more interesting.

Beyond this point there be tygers

Examples? Well, I’ve written and published stories about or including the following subjects: serial killers, time machines, park rangers, ghosts, UFO sightings, cattle drives, jewelry heists, terrorists, convents, political campaigns, alien invasions, rock bands, murder for hire, mountain climbing, carnivals, gunfighters, online dating services, insurance fraud, Bengal tigers, disc jockeys, space travel, arson, the Civil War, animal research, exotic poisons, angels, locked-room murders, hypnotism, escaped pythons (snakes on a plain?), death rays, railroads, bounty hunters, the Alaskan wilderness, jailbreaks, night watchmen, bomb squads, oil barons, Japanese detectives, police corruption, castaways, stagecoach robberies, scuba diving, axe-murders, England in the early 1900s, monsters, mobsters, ocean liners, the Alamo, casino gambling, and futuristic lie detectors.

As you might guess, few of those topics were familiar to me, beforehand. What I needed to know I learned from others, or from reference books and maps and online resources. With the proper research, what you don’t know can become what you know. The very fact that you’ve increased your comfort level with a particular subject can improve the quality and flow of your writing.

Sometimes, though . . .

Sometimes you can tapdance your way through difficult subject matter without having to reveal a lot of in-depth knowledge. Do your best, certainly; research the facts, be as credible as you can . . . but don’t obsess too much about it.

I’ll close with a quote I think I used once in an earlier column: According to Lawrence Block, “Ninety-eight percent of your readers won’t know whether the information is accurate or not, and the rest won’t care.”

Write what you know? My advice is, write what you know you’ll enjoy writing.

Posted in Mississippi Mud on February 20th, 2010
RSS 2.0 Both comments and pings are currently closed.

5 comments

  1. February 20th, 2010 at 6:39 am, Terrie Farley Moran Says:

    John,

    “Write what you know” reminds me that last week when I spoke at a book club, one of the members said she reads mostly non fiction about hobbies she enjoys like sailing and hiking.

    She mentioned that since, in the books she reads, the authors are mostly talking about their own life experience, she really wonders about mystery writers!!

    Terrie

  2. February 20th, 2010 at 9:24 am, Anita Page Says:

    I agree with you, John. The pure pleasure of writing is slipping into the skin of a character whose experience is very different from one’s own. The external details–setting, work experience, etc.–are easy enough to research. I once heard Stuart Kaminsky say in an interview that he’d never been to Russia, but you wouldn’t know that from his Rostnikov novels.

  3. February 20th, 2010 at 1:30 pm, alisa Says:

    I loved this article!

    It made me laugh remembering when I first started writing it was in romance and then and since (because I still edit/proof for some); when I was told that, and then after reading some of their books I really thought my marriage would be on the rocks! MY GOSH!!! Woo Wee….write what you KNOW?

    Then I realized we all have an extraordinary imagination. 🙂

    Sometimes I think there are interests that go beyond what we know but we like. Such as those you mentioned.

    I have an interest in serial killers. I know nothing about being a serial killer and I personally don’t own a gun, or knife, or anything dangerous (except a cell phone). 🙂

    I really am curious about their minds. I can’t seem to “get there” to truly understand the evil. Not sure I want to either!

    Great article and good advice to writers who are starting out.

  4. February 20th, 2010 at 1:47 pm, Deborah Says:

    Great article, John. I agree — to a point. No one has encountered aliens in space (in the middle of a cornfield maybe, but so far none out there in space), but we read about this in wonderful books all the time. BUT, I do think if you write about Dallas, you’d better know where those streets are and how those accents differ from those in Mississippi or New Orleans. (Who Dat!)

  5. February 20th, 2010 at 2:19 pm, John Floyd Says:

    You are correct, Deborah. One writer I talked with recently told me he spends a lot of time on Google Maps when he writes about cities he visited in years past. You want to make sure the buildings you describe as being on the corner of Fifth and Main haven’t turned into an amusement park since your last visit there.

    One way to get around that, though, is to set your story in the year you WERE there. Hey, when you’re the author you’re the head fred. Ain’t it good to be the king??

« Friday, February 19: Bandersnatches Sunday, February 21: The A.D.D. Detective »

The Sidebar

  • Lex Artis

      Crippen & Landru
      Futures Mystery   Anthology   Magazine
      Homeville
      The Mystery   Place
      Short Mystery   Fiction Society
      The Strand   Magazine
  • Amicae Curiae

      J.F. Benedetto
      Jan Burke
      Bill Crider
      CrimeSpace
      Dave's Fiction   Warehouse
      Emerald City
      Martin Edwards
      The Gumshoe Site
      Michael Haskins
      _holm
      Killer Hobbies
      Miss Begotten
      Murderati
      Murderous Musings
      Mysterious   Issues
      MWA
      The Rap Sheet
      Sandra Seamans
      Sweet Home   Alameda
      Women of   Mystery
      Louis Willis
  • Filed Briefs

    • Bandersnatches (226)
    • De Novo Review (10)
    • Femme Fatale (224)
    • From the Gallery (3)
    • High-Heeled Gumshoe (151)
    • Miscellany (2)
    • Mississippi Mud (192)
    • Mystery Masterclass (91)
    • New York Minute (21)
    • Spirit of the Law (18)
    • Surprise Witness (46)
    • The A.D.D. Detective (228)
    • The Scribbler (204)
    • Tune It Or Die! (224)
  • Legal Archives

    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
Criminal Brief: The Mystery Short Story Web Log Project - Copyright 2011 by the respective authors. All rights reserved.
Opinions expressed are solely those of the author expressing them, and do not reflect the positions of CriminalBrief.com.