The Docket

  • MONDAY:

    The Scribbler

    James Lincoln Warren

  • MONDAY:

    Spirit of the Law

    Janice Law

  • TUESDAY:

    High-Heeled Gumshoe

    Melodie Johnson Howe

  • WEDNESDAY:

    Tune It Or Die!

    Robert Lopresti

  • THURSDAY:

    Femme Fatale

    Deborah
    Elliott-Upton

  • FRIDAY:

    Bander- snatches

    Steven Steinbock

  • SATURDAY:

    Mississippi Mud

    John M. Floyd

  • SATURDAY:

    New York Minute

    Angela Zeman

  • SUNDAY:

    The A.D.D. Detective

    Leigh Lundin

  • AD HOC:

    Mystery Masterclass

    Distinguished Guest Contributors

  • AD HOC:

    Surprise Witness

    Guest Blogger

  • Aural Argument

    "The Sack 'Em Up Men"

    "Crow's Avenue"

    "The Stain"

    "Jumpin' Jack Flash"

    "The Art of the Short Story"

    "Bouchercon 2010 Short Story Panel"

Saturday, June 5: Mississippi Mud

TOTALLY LOST

by John M. Floyd

Not long ago one of my writer friends told me she’d be glad when she finished working on her current novel so she could start reading again. “So you can what?” I asked. “So I can start reading again,” she said. “I never read fiction while I’m writing fiction — it distracts me.” She went on to explain that she never even watches movies or TV shows (except for the news) during a writing project, for the same reason. Other plotlines interfere with the one she’s working on at the moment.

I’m not sure, exactly, how that approach can work. It couldn’t work for me, because if I didn’t read or watch movies while I’m in the middle of a writing project . . . well, I guess I wouldn’t read or watch movies at all, because I’m always working on a story or a novel or both, and I plan to continue doing that for the foreseeable future. And how can you be a writer if you don’t read?

I actually believe that the fiction a writer reads and sees can help the process, anytime and all the time. This past week I was convinced of that yet again, when I was among the devoted (and yes, brainwashed) fans who tuned in for what might have been the most widely publicized TV series finale in recent years.

Lost in my thoughts

I must mention, here, that I don’t watch much television. I watch the screen a lot, because it’s hooked to my DVD player, but I don’t watch many TV broadcasts, except — as my friend said — for the news. And I have almost never tuned in for every single episode of a made-for-TV series. The ones I’ve most enjoyed I’ve either rented and seen on DVD (cable series like The Sopranos, Deadwood, and Rome) or watched only during part of their run (I started late on Hill Street Blues and I finally gave up after a few years of ER).

But Lost? I was hooked from the get-go. For six seasons, I either sat there goggle-eyed in real time or I recorded it and saw it later that same night. What was it about that show, I often asked myself, that made it so captivating?

The answer is simple. It’s the same thing — two things, actually — that makes any piece of fiction a success: a gripping story and interesting characters. Lost, whether you loved it or ignored it, had both.

The mysterious island

First, the plot. A group of travellers made up of different races and nationalities crash on an uncharted island and then find out that they were so far off course no one’s even looking for them in the right place. Rescue ain’t gonna happen. Worse, there’s another group hidden in the jungle who aren’t merely antisocial; they’re so unfriendly they show up now and then to kidnap people in the middle of the night. And even worse, there’s something really big out there in the dark beyond the campfire that likes to roar and snap trees in half and snack on unlucky airline pilots. Fans later named it the Locke-ness monster, a term you’ll understand only if you were a fan.

The storyline, even though it got a little zany at times, accomplished what it set out to do: entertain the viewers and keep them watching. Why did it work? Because the show’s writers understood suspense. There weren’t many slow moments. Remember the old saying that if the plot begins to drag, have someone come through the door with a gun? That happened a lot, in Lost. The doors were usually jungle clearings or mission-control hatches, but there were plenty of weapons involved, from Uzis to machetes to sticks of dynamite. In one case, even an H-bomb. (That one’s a long story.)

A cast of castaways

Next, the characters. It would be hard to imagine a more dysfunctional group: a fugitive on the run, a former lottery winner/mental patient, an Iraqi soldier who specialized in torture, a drug-addicted rock star, a doctor with dominating-father issues, a reluctant assassin married to his boss’s daughter, a pregnant lady who almost sold her baby and then backed out, a father and son estranged from each other, a woman with terminal cancer, a wheelchair-bound man who was tricked into giving his father a kidney, and so on. A psychiatrist would have a field day with any one of these folks, and on this show the whole group was loony. Besides that, they were constantly in conflict with each other as well as with their inner demons.

As incredible as it sounds, I as a viewer really grew to care about these people. One reason was that the creators of the series decided to regularly cut away from the current action to show, via flashbacks, each character’s backstory. It was a brilliant move, and resulted in — at least for the first two seasons — some of the best TV I’ve seen in years. When one of the regulars succeeded in some attempt, I cheered; when one got killed (voted off the island?) I mourned.

Later on, I’ll admit, things got a little rocky. I almost bailed out a few times in seasons three and five, when plot holes appeared that were big enough to fly an Oceanic L-1011 through. But I hung in there, despite all the time-travel mumbojumbo and the flashbacks and flash-forwards and flash-sideways (yes, that’s another term introduced by this series). I remained faithful until and throughout the two-and-a-half-hour finale the other night. And now it’s over. As a tired and sweaty Butch said to Sundance after robbing a Bolivian bank:

“No more jungle work.”

The finale aired on Sunday, May 23rd. I’m not sure what I expected — I’ve hated some final episodes of big series (Seinfeld, The X-Files, St. Elsewhere) and loved others (Cheers, Newhart, The Mary Tyler Moore Show) — but I wound up enjoying this one. And wonder of wonders, they found a way to actually tie everything together in a pretty satisfying ending. They even incorporated a tried-and-true “circular storyline” technique: the opening shot of the series was a close-up of the main character’s eye opening; the final shot was a close-up of his eye closing.

Now that it’s done, I won’t say I’m Lost, but I do feel that I will miss those characters, and the island, and even the diabolical smoke monster. Hey, the show had a lot of things going for it: romance, fantasy, suspense, science fiction, an Oahu North Shore setting, and fantastic music by Michael Giacchino. And, supposedly, the most expensive pilot episode in TV history.

One thing I am happy about, though.

Now I don’t have to remember to be home or to set the DVR every Tuesday night.

Posted in Mississippi Mud on June 5th, 2010
RSS 2.0 Both comments and pings are currently closed.

12 comments

  1. June 5th, 2010 at 10:17 am, Barb Goffman Says:

    Hi, John. I, too, LOVED Lost. And I mourn its passing. I’m still hoping ABC will be smart enough to add a Sawyer/Miles buddy-cop show to their lineup. It would be fabulous!

  2. June 5th, 2010 at 11:17 am, John Floyd Says:

    Hey Barb. I’m such a fan I wound up watching the finale again last night on DVR. And I’m almost never a fan of any kind of TV series anymore. I swear, I love the music that accompanied that show.

    Yep, I’d watch a spinoff if they decide to do one.

  3. June 5th, 2010 at 11:30 am, Rob Says:

    speaking of cop spinoffs the actor who playe Gin has been hired for a new version of Hawaii 50, so he doesn’t even have to leave the state.

    I liked the ending (especially the fact that it set a few things up so you had to figure them out for yourself – like the cryptic exchange between Hurley and Ben at the end) but some loose ends bugged me:

    Why did the pregnant women die?

    What did the Others learn from Walt?

    Why didn’t Smoky have a name? (I was expecting it to be Esau, but maybe the producers nixed that as being too obviously religious.)

  4. June 5th, 2010 at 1:21 pm, John Floyd Says:

    Rob, you’re right, there were a lot of loose ends. I thought the character issues were resolved pretty well (the overall theme seemed to have been redemption, especially for folks like Jack, Sayid, Kate, Charlie, Gin, etc.), but some of the mythology was just never explained. Who built the magic donkey-wheel? What was the statue of the Egyptian goddess doing there?

    I’m not sure whether the writers threw some of the missing links in during the heat of invention and then couldn’t figure out a good way to resolve them, or whether they wanted to leave viewers with things to debate around the water-cooler afterward. Maybe both.

    I know Deborah likes all this stuff as much as I do, but I can just see JLW and Leigh and Steve now, rolling their eyes and thinking Well, Floyd and Lopresti have finally gone off the deep end of the island.

    I bet Velma kept up with every episode.

  5. June 5th, 2010 at 5:24 pm, Velma Says:

    Kept up with it? I wanted to star in it. I haven’t loved a show so much since City of Angels, the Wayne Rogers noir detective series.

  6. June 5th, 2010 at 7:24 pm, Stephen Ross Says:

    They’re remaking Hawaii Five-0? Oh please no!!!

  7. June 5th, 2010 at 7:32 pm, John Floyd Says:

    Attagirl, Velma.

    As for the Hawaii Five-O remake, that’s the first I’d heard of that. Maybe McGarrett’ll finally catch Wo Fat, or Lo Fat, or whatever his name was. Book him, Danno.

  8. June 5th, 2010 at 9:04 pm, Jeff Baker Says:

    As big a sci-fi/t.v. geek as I have been I never got into “Lost.” Never even watched it! But I loved your analysis, John! Hey, does anyone but me remember that there was a reality show also called “Lost” that appeared and vanished a season or so before this one?? As for series finales, give me the weird ending to “Quantum Leap” over the weird ending to “Magnum P.I.”

  9. June 5th, 2010 at 9:16 pm, Stephen Ross Says:

    Wo Fat. Spoiler alert… I believe he was finally booked in the last episode of the last season. H50 is an old favourite of mine.

  10. June 5th, 2010 at 9:30 pm, John Floyd Says:

    Interesting, about the LOST reality show. That one got past me (was lost to me?). And I sort of liked the Quantum Leap finale, though, yes, it was weird. (The M*A*S*H finale was another of those that I half liked and half didn’t.)

    Wo Fat. Ah so. Stephen, I heard somebody say they indeed booked him in the last episode of H5O, and then something (I’m not sure what) was revealed that indicated he had escaped, or would escape. So maybe that dude will be back as well.

  11. June 6th, 2010 at 10:51 am, Steve Steinbock Says:

    I’m entering this discussion a day late and a few coconuts short, but here’s my take: I watched the show from almost the start. (Like this discussion, I came in late and had to play catch-up).

    There were times when I thought the show had nearly jumped the shark. (That expression may be more apropos to “Lost” than it was to “Happy Days” where it originated). But I stayed faithful.

    Rob, the same things that bothered you bothered me. And I also kept waiting for someone to refer to the Smoke Monster as Esau. (Anyone notice relevance in any of the other names: Jack and John, the two main ideological opponents for most of the show, are often variations of each other, as well as “Jack” being a variation on “Jacob.” The name “Shepherd” also has messianic connotations.

    The multitude of unresolved questions and plot-threads bugged me. I sort of felt that the resolution of the show in that 2.5 hour finale was a cop-out, (It was actually the theory that I was favoring way back in season one). But just the same I thought it was very well done, brought in nice and surprising character bits, and was just plain poetic.

    But the numbers? The polar bears? The four-toed statue? Dharma beer? Charles Widmore? The other group of “Others” (from the temple) that we didn’t learn about until the final season? Those things are still lost on me.

  12. June 7th, 2010 at 12:11 pm, Deborah Says:

    I had been so backlogged with other projects, I didn’t have a chance to watch the last LOST until last night (Thank God for DVR techjnology!). Oh, I am going to miss that show. I loved how the writers wove the characters together like a fine tapestry. Reminded me of those people passing us everyday that we don’t really know — except we do — it was marvelous. So marvelous that I cannot wait to purchase the whole set and watch it again, but this time I’m intent on seeing how it all worked together. I am having moments of de ja vu knowing this is a great way to learn from the masters. For those who didn’t watch the series, I’m sorry, you LOST big time.

« Friday, June 4: Bandersnatches Sunday, June 6: The A.D.D. Detective »

The Sidebar

  • Lex Artis

      Crippen & Landru
      Futures Mystery   Anthology   Magazine
      Homeville
      The Mystery   Place
      Short Mystery   Fiction Society
      The Strand   Magazine
  • Amicae Curiae

      J.F. Benedetto
      Jan Burke
      Bill Crider
      CrimeSpace
      Dave's Fiction   Warehouse
      Emerald City
      Martin Edwards
      The Gumshoe Site
      Michael Haskins
      _holm
      Killer Hobbies
      Miss Begotten
      Murderati
      Murderous Musings
      Mysterious   Issues
      MWA
      The Rap Sheet
      Sandra Seamans
      Sweet Home   Alameda
      Women of   Mystery
      Louis Willis
  • Filed Briefs

    • Bandersnatches (226)
    • De Novo Review (10)
    • Femme Fatale (224)
    • From the Gallery (3)
    • High-Heeled Gumshoe (151)
    • Miscellany (2)
    • Mississippi Mud (192)
    • Mystery Masterclass (91)
    • New York Minute (21)
    • Spirit of the Law (18)
    • Surprise Witness (46)
    • The A.D.D. Detective (228)
    • The Scribbler (204)
    • Tune It Or Die! (224)
  • Legal Archives

    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
Criminal Brief: The Mystery Short Story Web Log Project - Copyright 2011 by the respective authors. All rights reserved.
Opinions expressed are solely those of the author expressing them, and do not reflect the positions of CriminalBrief.com.