Wednesday, October 13: Tune It Or Die!
STOUT-HEARTED MAN
by Rob Lopresti
In response to James’ recent column about phoning it in, which is to say, telling the same story in book after book, I said that I would get around some time to writing about how Rex Stout handled that problem by using plot devices exactly twice.
But before we go there, let’s talk a bit about one of my favorite authors. You probably know he created Nero Wolfe and Archie Goodwin and wrote 33 novels about them, and about the same number of novelettes, but here are a few facts you might not know:
- Stout was born to a Quaker family and grew up saying “thee” and “thou.”
- In the Navy he was a crewman on Theodore Roosevelt’s presidential yacht.
- He founded the school banking system, in which children brought coins to open an account and get a little interest. He was justifiably proud that no child lost a penny when the Depression started crushing banks.
- He was part of the “lost generation” of American artists and authors who moved to Paris after World War I, where he wrote psychological novels which generally got good reviews and small sales.
- He started writing his first Nero Wolfe novel — about two men who by age could have been father and son — the day he brought his newborn first child, a daughter, home from the hospital.
- Politically, Stout wasn’t easy to label. He was a firm anti-Communist who despised J. Edgar Hoover. He was a Hawk on Vietnam who swore to stay alive until Richard Nixon was out of office – and did.
- The first Nero Wolfe book begins with the end of Prohibition. The last one, forty years later, contemplates Watergate.
For what it’s worth, here are my five favorite Nero Wolfe books, in chronological order:
- Too Many Cooks (1938)
- Prisoner’s Base (1952)
- Before Midnight (1955)
- The Doorbell Rang (1965)
- A Family Affair (1975)
And the best novelettes:
- “The Cop Killer” (1952)
- “The Next Witness” (1956)
- “Too Many Detectives (1957)
- “Poison A La Carte” (1962)
- “Counterfeit For Murder” (1962)
Feel free to argue.
Once is not enough; thrice is too many
Now, let’s talk about Stout using plot devices twice. To the best of my knowledge, Stout never said he did that deliberately, and I don’t think John McAleer reported it in his excellent biography.
But I think Stout did it far too often to be an accident. And, in my opinion, he usually used the plot device better the second time around.
Twenty years ago I could have made a much longer list of examples, but I haven’t reread the novels and especially the novelettes (which aren’t as good, in my opinion) in a long time. I honestly can’t remember what some of them were about, much less the clever plot devices he repeated in them.
However, here are some of the tricks he used twice. For obvious reasons I have left out the titles of the books involved, except in one case where I had to leave out the plot device instead. If you have read the two books in question you probably know what I am getting at.
- A doctor murdering the patient he is treating
- A child witness
- A lawyer killing a client to hide a forged will
- Wolfe hiring a double
- A dog identifying a killer
- An illegitimate child having an illegitimate child
- A factor that connects Death of a Doxy and A Family Affair
Anyone have more examples?
Thanks for the background on Stoudt! He is still my favorite. Have you read the Nero Wolfe Cookbook (Viking Press 1973)? It has everything from scrabmled eggs to opossum and which stories Fritz whipped up which dishes!
Telecommunications notwithstanding, I confess that I, yes, even I, have recycled certain ideas. Two, count ’em, two, of my stories end with a strong suggestion that a woman pushed her lover off a high place to his death. And I’ve ended at least three stories with an ironic reference to a newspaper article. (But there are only four stories, not five, since one of them does both, i.e., ends with an ironic newspaper reference strongly suggesting that a woman pushed her lover off a high place to his death.) If anybody’s ever noticed this peculiar penchant of mine for repetition, they haven’t said anything to me, but trust me, I’ve noticed.
I did this not because of any failure of imagination, but because they seemed to be the most appropriate ways to end those particular stories. As far as the being-pushed-off-the-precipice angle is concerned, in both instances it represented repayment in kind for the lover’s own crimes. I agonized over the second time I did this, because I didn’t want to be repeating myself, because I didn’t want to be repeating myself, but in the end (at the end?) went with it anyway—it was what the story called for. In every other regard, the stories are radically different.
With regard to the newspaper references, they’re literary codas appended after the action fades to let the reader know that stories actually continue even after it seems like they’re finished. They’re sort of my way of saying, “and they lived happily ever after,” but without the happiness part.
Since you say “feel free to disagree,” let me say that I Prisoner’s Base is not my favorite because the first 2 , and probably the 3rd, murder can be attributed to Wolfe’s & Archie’s childish behavior. Any fan of Stout, enjoys the occasional rancorous behavior between the two, but in this case it did, and Archie thinks so too, result in death. I will not quibble with your other 4 favs, but like Some Buried Caesar better than Prisoner’s Base.
A study of re-cycled plot devices would be most illuminating!
Also, please tell me which book besides the one in which the double eats gingershaps (trying not to provide a spoiler), Wolfe hires a double? I can’t remember & would love to know.
Carol
My argument for Prisoner’s Base is: the conflicts betwewen Wolfe anbd Archie, the sspense of the telephone secene, and the cleverness of the motive for the first murder. Your mileage may differ.
As for the second hiring of a double …. you are going to kick yourself. The Dorbell Rang.
>The Dorbell Rang.
The Dormouse did it?
Agatha Christie (of course) knew how to re-use an idea or two!