Tuesday, November 2: High-Heeled Gumshoe
I, THE VILLAIN
by Melodie Johnson Howe
I never liked Halloween. I think it’s because my childhood was one long Halloween night. However, I did love being a witch. When playing games of pretend I was glad to play the part of the “bad” person. The villain. I instinctively knew where the power lay.
This was made clear to me last week when a newscaster, trolling in a costume store, was interviewing children about what they wanted to be for Halloween. They all gave the usual answers from princess to Spiderman. But one little boy said, “ A monster!” And he meant it. The newscaster, taken aback by his vehemence, asked in that cloying adult voice of a woman who has never raised a child, “Why do you want to be a monster?” The little boy said, “Because it’s my turn to scare the adults.” “Why do want to scare the adults?” “Because they get to scare me all year long.”
To not be scared is to be in control, to not be dominated. So one night of the year this little boy will feel what that is like. Only a child can turn a scary monster into a positive, at least for one night. So can the mystery writer.
We depend on monsters. They propel our stories. We’d be out of business without them. If not for the villains, our protagonist would have nothing to fight, to fear, to triumph over. Like all evil doers they come in various shapes, sizes, and sex. And we have an ambivalent admiration for many of them.
I would rather watch Richard the Third connive, deceive, and kill than wait for Hamlet to make up his mind while he bumbles around the castle creating havoc. When Richard screams, “My kingdom for a horse!”, I’ve always longed for a stray steed to lope by so he could leap on it, and ride away to deceive for another day.
Greta Garbo was in the selected audience for the screening of Jean Cocteau’s film, The Beauty and The Beast. After the beast turned into the prince and the movie ended, it is said that Garbo’s low sultry voice could be heard in the still dark room moaning, “I vant my beast back.” The raging dangerous beast was more seductive than the perfect prince.
Richard had a hump and the prince was imprisoned in his furry animal body. But these qualities, some might say infirmities, makes them more human and more threatening. I think Richard M. Nixon had an invisible hump.
One of my favorite villains is Veda Pierce in the novel, Mildred Pierce. I must apologize because I read it many years ago and I’m afraid the movie (a must see) and the book have merged in my mind. Mildred has two daughters. The good one dies, the evil one lives. Veda is as conniving as Richard the Third. In the movie she kills, in the book she doesn’t. Her ruthlessness is captivating; a young woman without a conscience. In the novel she goes on to live her cruel life, in the movie she is arrested. Veda is completely free of principle and shame. She’s the monster we might want to be for one Halloween night.
Another villain is Waldo Lydecker in Vera Caspary’s novel, Laura. Again the book and movie blur. I remember him as a fat obsessive lurking antique dealer in the book. It is the villain acted by Clifton Webb in the film that I think is the best. He is urbane, loathingly honest, and brilliant in his brutal wit. A man who prides himself on the best and the perfect, except he makes one very human mistake and falls in love. Wanting to obliterate his love object, and with her all his human emotions, he kills the wrong woman. Another controlling monster disguised as a seductive charmer.
As villains go I find Gutman more interesting than “Miss Wonderly” in The Maltese Falcon. She’s clever in an instinctive ruthless way, but he is sophisticated and knowledgeable. I’m a pushover for a villain who is philosophical about what he has to do to get what he wants.
Hannibal Lecter is one of the best villains ever. He has all the characteristics I’ve already mentioned and more. He is King Richard The Third on steroids. It is also his relationship with the protagonist Clarice Starling that gives him a human dimension. Without these two beautifully drawn characters The Silence of the Lambs would just be another good serial killer novel. And I never would have read it.
The villains in Chandler’ s work don’t stand out to me in any grand way, except for Moose and Velma in Farewell, My Lovely. Moose is the exact opposite of the brilliant witty villains. He is an animal. He only knows how to get what he wants by being a brute; yet in that enormous frame is a heart and it yearns for Velma. He has to find her. Again, love for a woman is his downfall. Moose is a poignant thug. Velma is the epitome of the villainous woman of Chandler’s time. “It was a blonde. A blonde to make a bishop kick a hole in a stained-glass window.”
Velma is running from her past and is struggling to keep her position as a wealthy man’s wife. Even in Los Angeles you can’t change who you are completely. There is always somebody to search you out. Together Velma and Moose make one fascinating villain.
There are so many good evil characters I could on and on, and I’m sure you all have your favorites.
If you’re a new struggling writer having trouble with your plot take a good hard look at your villain. See what he wants (villains are very goal- directed), figure out why he wants it, and how he can get it. Your plot will begin to gel. Remember, the villain moves the story.
Wonderful article, Melodie. Your observation(and advice)about the villain is brilliant. I had never quite thought of it that way; now I can’t wait to try out that approach. Thanks.
By the way, I’ve always like Richard III myself. There are some great apologias out there on his history that make for some thoughtful reading–they were cruel times, indeed.
It’s funny, as I was reading your column Caspar Gutman was exactly who I thought of. There’s that wonderful line in the movie, I don’t remember if it is in the book, where he says to Wilmer “You are like a son to me, but if a man loses a son he can always get another.” Cold? Sub-zero.
Loved this. You are so right: the villain must be just as motivated as the hero, and requires at least as much of the writer’s time.
I used to think Anthony Hopkins as Hannibal was my favorite movie villain, but Javier Bardem (No Country for Old Men) would run him a good race.
Thank you, David, I think we long for grand villains as much we long for grand heros. And Richard was one of the best.
Rob, you are right on Gutman. That piece of dialogue is the perfect example of dialogue as characterization.They don’t make them like that anymore.
John,
I forgot about Javier Bardem. No Country for Old Men is one of my favorite books. Oh, to write like he does.
This is an inspirational piece–a not so subtle reminder of how important villains are to our work.
Terrie
Excellent post and great advice! A few years ago, I stumbled into the technique of outlining my stories from the antagonist’s point of view first. I list their victories and defeats (within the scope of the story and even prior to it) and see how the antagonist’s actions are shaped by them. It functions like a backbone to give shape to the hero’s story and makes the writing go much easier.
The exact line in Hammett is:
“Well, Wilmer, I’m sorry indeed to lose you, and I want you to know that I couldn’t be any fonder of you if you were my own son; but well—by Gad!—if you lose a son it’s possible to get another—and there’s only one Maltese falcon.”
A little windier than Rob’s reminiscence of it, but that’s Caspar Gutman for you.
I also love that line, and in context it is even more cruel and crude. First, there is a blatant suggestion in the book that Wilmer is Gutman’s “gunsel” (Yiddish for catamite), so there’s an incestuous connotation. The sex doesn’t stop there, though, because the verb “get” is a pun, first meaning “to gain” and secondly meaning “to procreate” (be + get = beget). Gutman is indulging in frivolous wordplay while betraying the only person in the world who cares for him. And we all know what it means to be screwed.
Gotta love a girl named Velma!
Great column and terrific quote:
“A blonde to make a bishop kick a hole in a stained-glass window.”
Siamese Velmas, separated at birth?
[Co-joined is just too PC for our V.]