The Docket

  • MONDAY:

    The Scribbler

    James Lincoln Warren

  • MONDAY:

    Spirit of the Law

    Janice Law

  • TUESDAY:

    High-Heeled Gumshoe

    Melodie Johnson Howe

  • WEDNESDAY:

    Tune It Or Die!

    Robert Lopresti

  • THURSDAY:

    Femme Fatale

    Deborah
    Elliott-Upton

  • FRIDAY:

    Bander- snatches

    Steven Steinbock

  • SATURDAY:

    Mississippi Mud

    John M. Floyd

  • SATURDAY:

    New York Minute

    Angela Zeman

  • SUNDAY:

    The A.D.D. Detective

    Leigh Lundin

  • AD HOC:

    Mystery Masterclass

    Distinguished Guest Contributors

  • AD HOC:

    Surprise Witness

    Guest Blogger

  • Aural Argument

    "The Sack 'Em Up Men"

    "Crow's Avenue"

    "The Stain"

    "Jumpin' Jack Flash"

    "The Art of the Short Story"

    "Bouchercon 2010 Short Story Panel"

Friday, September 5: Bandersnatches

NOVEL CONCEPTS

by Steven Steinbock

At the beginning of October, I had pretty well completed the first draft of the novel I’d been working on since spring. By pretty well, I admit that there were still four chapters that consisted only of bullet points, including a few questions I had yet to discover the answers to.

So in the weeks leading up to Bouchercon, I switched gears. I traded in my writer’s gear for an editor’s briefcase and set out, page by page, to do the first phase of edits. My goals were to address logical and stylistic issues. Logical include things like continuity and consistency (making sure Eva doesn’t change her hair-color midway through the book, or that her Jetta doesn’t suddenly turn into a Saab). It also involved retrofitting characters or settings.

As I was writing the first draft, a lot of things surprised me. Two significant secondary characters arrived on the scene late. I honestly didn’t know who they were before they appeared on the page, but once they showed up, they demanded bigger roles. In the case of one of them, it meant that I’d need to introduce her much earlier in the book. There was also a setting that became pivotal to the climax of the book. Rather than dropping that locale in at the eleventh hour, I wanted to introduce it in the first quarter of the novel.

Stylistic editing included fixing typos, making sure the tone and voice were consistent, and killing off a few “darlings.”

The editing process presented some unexpected results. I expected that I’d be able to plow though twenty or thirty pages of manuscript each day. Turns out I was being overly optimistic. Three to five pages has been my average.

While writing the first draft, I measured my progress by daily word count. With the editing, I measure my progress by pages.

Perhaps a product of my age, I need to do most of the editing on a hard copy with a red pen. I know there are people who can think on the screen. I’m not one of them. So I began the process with a tall stack of printouts, and have slowly been covering each page with ink. I alternate between the pen-and-hard-copy editing and the word processor. Today, for instance, I’m typing up the changes in chapter thirteen, while marking up the hard-copy of chapter fourteen.

This seems like a lot of drudgery, and for the most part, it has been. But I’ve been surprised at how exciting some of the process can be. For one thing, when writing the first draft, it’s nearly impossible to see the forest for the trees. But in this rereading, I’ve been able to look down at the whole forest and see the entire landscape.

The process of discovery has been the most exciting part of the editing process. Two of those four unfinished chapters are now complete, and writing them went fast and fun. I also began seeing the characters in a deeper way. There are two characters in the book who are about as different from each other as two characters can be. But as I watch them grow on the page, I begin noticing parallel tracks in their lives. On some subconscious level, I may have known it all along, but I think that’s giving me more credit than I deserve. The discovery of the parallels between these two characters has been staggering. Had I subjected them to Jungian analysis, I’m not sure I’d have found more profound connections.

But that’s enough with talk. I’ve got a chapter to edit.

See you in a week with news about Tough Guys on Audio.

Posted in Bandersnatches on November 5th, 2010
RSS 2.0 Both comments and pings are currently closed.

2 comments

  1. November 6th, 2010 at 5:32 pm, Terrie Farley Moran Says:

    Isn’t it great when you discover that your characters have lives you knew nothing about? Terrie

  2. November 6th, 2010 at 6:19 pm, Martin Edwards Says:

    Very best of luck with it, Steve!

« Thursday, November 4: Femme Fatale Saturday, November 6: Mississippi Mud »

The Sidebar

  • Lex Artis

      Crippen & Landru
      Futures Mystery   Anthology   Magazine
      Homeville
      The Mystery   Place
      Short Mystery   Fiction Society
      The Strand   Magazine
  • Amicae Curiae

      J.F. Benedetto
      Jan Burke
      Bill Crider
      CrimeSpace
      Dave's Fiction   Warehouse
      Emerald City
      Martin Edwards
      The Gumshoe Site
      Michael Haskins
      _holm
      Killer Hobbies
      Miss Begotten
      Murderati
      Murderous Musings
      Mysterious   Issues
      MWA
      The Rap Sheet
      Sandra Seamans
      Sweet Home   Alameda
      Women of   Mystery
      Louis Willis
  • Filed Briefs

    • Bandersnatches (226)
    • De Novo Review (10)
    • Femme Fatale (224)
    • From the Gallery (3)
    • High-Heeled Gumshoe (151)
    • Miscellany (2)
    • Mississippi Mud (192)
    • Mystery Masterclass (91)
    • New York Minute (21)
    • Spirit of the Law (18)
    • Surprise Witness (46)
    • The A.D.D. Detective (228)
    • The Scribbler (204)
    • Tune It Or Die! (224)
  • Legal Archives

    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
Criminal Brief: The Mystery Short Story Web Log Project - Copyright 2011 by the respective authors. All rights reserved.
Opinions expressed are solely those of the author expressing them, and do not reflect the positions of CriminalBrief.com.