The Docket

  • MONDAY:

    The Scribbler

    James Lincoln Warren

  • MONDAY:

    Spirit of the Law

    Janice Law

  • TUESDAY:

    High-Heeled Gumshoe

    Melodie Johnson Howe

  • WEDNESDAY:

    Tune It Or Die!

    Robert Lopresti

  • THURSDAY:

    Femme Fatale

    Deborah
    Elliott-Upton

  • FRIDAY:

    Bander- snatches

    Steven Steinbock

  • SATURDAY:

    Mississippi Mud

    John M. Floyd

  • SATURDAY:

    New York Minute

    Angela Zeman

  • SUNDAY:

    The A.D.D. Detective

    Leigh Lundin

  • AD HOC:

    Mystery Masterclass

    Distinguished Guest Contributors

  • AD HOC:

    Surprise Witness

    Guest Blogger

  • Aural Argument

    "The Sack 'Em Up Men"

    "Crow's Avenue"

    "The Stain"

    "Jumpin' Jack Flash"

    "The Art of the Short Story"

    "Bouchercon 2010 Short Story Panel"

Saturday, January 22: Mississippi Mud

STORIES FOR SALE—NEW & USED

by John M. Floyd

There are two tasks you must perform if you’re to be a published author. Obviously, one of them is to write the manuscript. The other is to sell what you write. The marketing phase can’t be done without the writing, and published writing can’t be done without the marketing.

I already know I’m weird, but I actually enjoy the process of trying to find markets for my short stories. It’s not as much fun as writing them (I’m not that weird), but it’s also not something I dread doing. The only part I don’t like is the actual packaging and mailing of a manuscript. But even that has become easier, since many magazines and anthologies now allow the use of electronic submissions, which saves time, paper, printer ink, money for stamps, and trips to the P.O.

Mining for gold

I use two different ways to locate homes for my stories. One is the annual Novel & Short Story Writer’s Market (WD Books, $30) and the other is the Internet. N&SSWM, with its hundreds of listings handily organized by category, has everything a writer needs to know, but even when I find a possible market there I still check it out online before submitting. If I take the Internet route first, I just Google something like “short mystery markets” or click on a site like duotrope’s digest or Storypilot or Ralan’s Webstravaganza and go from there. Once I find what looks like paydirt, I check out that market’s individual site for submission guidelines, sample content, payment terms, etc., and if/when I’m satisfied I write a cover letter and send my story out the door and let it fend for itself. Sometimes it’s accepted and sometimes it comes limping back home again.

Does all this prospecting sometimes produce fool’s gold? Sure it does. I’ve published stories in some places that I’d rather forget about, and quite a few stories in places that shortly afterward keeled over and put all four feet in the air. (Sometimes they died even before my accepted submissions had a chance to get published.) But none of those sales were wasted. In submitting to those editors and dealing with them I feel that I learned more about the process and the business, and besides, I’ve since been able to submit and sell most of those published stories as reprints to other markets.

Often dissed, seldom kissed

I don’t mean to imply by all this that I don’t receive more rejections than acceptances. I still do. The difference is, I get more acceptances than I used to, and the rejections don’t bother me as much. The thick skin everyone says you must develop to be a published writer happens quickly if you submit a lot of stories, and pretty soon you stop taking rejection so personally. As I think I’ve said before, it’s important to remember that good stories get rejected every day. To make it as a writer—at least as a short story writer—you have to keep reading, keep writing, and keep submitting. And for God’s sake don’t pay too much attention to the odds; if you do, you might never try to submit anything.

To paraphrase something Lawrence Block once said, “A rejection slip is your membership card into the universal fellowship of writers.” All of us get them. Writers who say they don’t are still writers, but they’re also liars.

Bonus material

An additional benefit of researching possible story markets is that it’s made me familiar with a lot of publications that I otherwise wouldn’t have known about. Some of them that have never even accepted one of my stories have become places that I now go to in order to read stories written by others.

Another plus: As a result of all these submissions over the past years, I have come to know (or at least I feel that I know) certain editors fairly well. Four of my favorites in the short-mystery world are Linda Landrigan at AHMM, Janet Hutchings at EQMM, Johnene Granger at Woman’s World, and Andrew Gulli at The Strand. These are kind and delightful people in real life and are incredibly good at their jobs. I hope they’ll stay at their posts forever.

NO LOITERING

A quick word about output. All of us who are writers know about setting goals for the number of words or pages you complete during writing sessions. Well, the same kind of quota system can apply to your marketing efforts. For example, many writers say it’s helpful to try to have a certain number of manuscripts in the mail and under consideration at any one point in time.

For the first ten of the sixteen years I’ve been submitting stories for publication, I made sure I always kept a minimum of thirty stories out there and circulating at any one time. If one got rejected, I sent another one out to that market and sent the rejected story someplace else. I don’t do that anymore—over the past five or six years I’ve tried to be more selective in targeting my submissions, and I tend to concentrate more on paying markets—but I still try to keep a dozen or so stories in the mail (or zooming around in cyberspace) at a time. There’s no rule of thumb here, and there was nothing magic about the number thirty; I just figured if I kept that many stories circulating, I’d be getting regular replies in my mailbox—and I did.

Everybody’s a salesman

The bottom line is, if you’re a writer it’s not enough to merely write. Now and then you also have to put on your plaid sportcoat and white shoes and trudge out to the lot or the showroom and make your pitch to customers.

Most of them won’t buy a thing—but some will. And when they do, that makes it all worthwhile.

Posted in Mississippi Mud on January 22nd, 2011
RSS 2.0 Both comments and pings are currently closed.

6 comments

  1. January 22nd, 2011 at 12:19 pm, Terrie Farley Moran Says:

    Hi John,

    You are a busy bee! I wrote and placed four stories in 2010 and that was my best year ever. Not nearly as prolific as you are, but fun nevertheless.

    Terrie

  2. January 22nd, 2011 at 1:20 pm, John Floyd Says:

    Four stories a year in some of the places YOU have been published is a big deal indeed, Terrie. Keep up the good work!

    And yep, it is fun, isn’t it.

  3. January 22nd, 2011 at 3:01 pm, Yoshinori Todo Says:

    Great article, John. Very informative.

    I gotta say I blinked when I read, “I made sure I always kept a minimum of thirty stories out there and circulating at any one time.” 30 stories? Wow, that’s a lot! Were they all (or most of them) paying markets?

  4. January 22nd, 2011 at 3:26 pm, John Floyd Says:

    Josh, I did always try to target at least some paying markets for my submissions. Some of them, though, only paid “in copies” or, in the case of Orchard Press Mysteries and other zines, paid nothing at all. But I made it a point to always keep something in the mail to places like AH and EQ and Grit and The Strand and WW as well–and that turned out to be a good move.

    Bear in mind that I had already written a huge number of stories before I ever started trying to submit anything. So it was easy for me to make myself keep a lot of them circulating at any one time.

    I also believe that a writer should write a story and THEN try to match it to a market, rather than doing it the other way around (trying to write a story FOR a particular market). Or at least at first. If you’ve written a good story it will eventually find a home.

  5. January 23rd, 2011 at 10:55 pm, Jeff Baker Says:

    “a minimum of thirty stories…” Can I say “Wow!!!!!?”

  6. January 25th, 2011 at 1:08 pm, Leigh Says:

    I’m still catching up with articles, but John, I think this is the first CB article I’ve bookmarked.

« Friday, January 21: Bandersnatches Sunday, January 23: The A.D.D. Detective »

The Sidebar

  • Lex Artis

      Crippen & Landru
      Futures Mystery   Anthology   Magazine
      Homeville
      The Mystery   Place
      Short Mystery   Fiction Society
      The Strand   Magazine
  • Amicae Curiae

      J.F. Benedetto
      Jan Burke
      Bill Crider
      CrimeSpace
      Dave's Fiction   Warehouse
      Emerald City
      Martin Edwards
      The Gumshoe Site
      Michael Haskins
      _holm
      Killer Hobbies
      Miss Begotten
      Murderati
      Murderous Musings
      Mysterious   Issues
      MWA
      The Rap Sheet
      Sandra Seamans
      Sweet Home   Alameda
      Women of   Mystery
      Louis Willis
  • Filed Briefs

    • Bandersnatches (226)
    • De Novo Review (10)
    • Femme Fatale (224)
    • From the Gallery (3)
    • High-Heeled Gumshoe (151)
    • Miscellany (2)
    • Mississippi Mud (192)
    • Mystery Masterclass (91)
    • New York Minute (21)
    • Spirit of the Law (18)
    • Surprise Witness (46)
    • The A.D.D. Detective (228)
    • The Scribbler (204)
    • Tune It Or Die! (224)
  • Legal Archives

    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
Criminal Brief: The Mystery Short Story Web Log Project - Copyright 2011 by the respective authors. All rights reserved.
Opinions expressed are solely those of the author expressing them, and do not reflect the positions of CriminalBrief.com.