The Docket

  • MONDAY:

    The Scribbler

    James Lincoln Warren

  • MONDAY:

    Spirit of the Law

    Janice Law

  • TUESDAY:

    High-Heeled Gumshoe

    Melodie Johnson Howe

  • WEDNESDAY:

    Tune It Or Die!

    Robert Lopresti

  • THURSDAY:

    Femme Fatale

    Deborah
    Elliott-Upton

  • FRIDAY:

    Bander- snatches

    Steven Steinbock

  • SATURDAY:

    Mississippi Mud

    John M. Floyd

  • SATURDAY:

    New York Minute

    Angela Zeman

  • SUNDAY:

    The A.D.D. Detective

    Leigh Lundin

  • AD HOC:

    Mystery Masterclass

    Distinguished Guest Contributors

  • AD HOC:

    Surprise Witness

    Guest Blogger

  • Aural Argument

    "The Sack 'Em Up Men"

    "Crow's Avenue"

    "The Stain"

    "Jumpin' Jack Flash"

    "The Art of the Short Story"

    "Bouchercon 2010 Short Story Panel"

Monday, August 20: The Scribbler

COVERING THE STORY (Conclusion)

by James Lincoln Warren

So I’d written a story about a cop reacting to a crime against children for a target market. My two writing buddies, Paul and Deborah had written very similar stories. I was worried that all three stories were too much alike. My friends offered me some criticism, and I offered them some criticism.

I decided to ignore their criticism.

Both Debbie and Paul had not liked my murderer for not being a character in the story until the climax. They both liked the same minor character, introduced earlier, for the rôle. Now usually, my rule is if I get the same criticism from two different readers, I address the problem. But in this case, I was firmly against the change. If two readers had chosen the same character as the murderer, then that must be too obvious to use. You never want people to read a story and identify the murderer with ease. I thought making the murderer an unknown person made him more distant and chilling.

Then Margaret (i.e., Mrs. Warren), with her J.D. and M.A. in Brit Lit, agreed conclusively with Paul and Deb. Colleagues you can politely brush off, but the opinion of a spouse carries the weight of nations. (This seems to be a recurrent theme here at C.B. these past few days.) And it is categorically not possible to prevail in a debate with my wife the trial lawyer, who, after all, argues for a living.

So I reluctantly changed the identity of the murderer. While I was at it, I also decided to incorporate another gem of Paul’s advice, that my detective had lost his own child many years before, to make the crimes personally resonate with him.

I chose the title right after finishing the first draft. It is not unusual for crime writers to use lines from nursery rhymes as titles. It is not unusual for crime writers to see sleep as a metaphor for death (while we’re on the subject of Raymond Chandler, never mind William Shakespeare). I had a pervasive wind as a recurring image. So I took the title from the best known lullaby of them all—but I wonder which came first: the lullaby, or the modus operandi? Because my victims are all dropped from high places to their deaths.

Rock-a-bye, baby, on the tree top,
When the wind blows the cradle will rock.
When the bough breaks, the cradle will fall,
Down will come baby, cradle and all.

I was pleased with my effort. Into the envelope it went, into the post. The Long Wait began.

Paul’s story, which he had extensively rewritten largely following my advice—before we go a step further, I want to state categorically that I take no credit whatsoever for Paul’s story, which is exclusively his, any more than he can take credit for mine, where his advice was liberally applied—was chosen by the editors of the anthology as one of the unsolicited stories to be included. (The book should be available this fall.) “When the Wind Blows” and “Texas Ruby” did not make the cut. (I had warned Deb that naming her victim after a grapefruit might be problematical.)

Was the crime against children angle too much of a cliché?

So I sent the story to Ellery Queen. Janet Hutchings liked the writing, but found the plot too contrived.

I began to think maybe the plot was too much of a cliché.

Linda LandriganBy this time, Edgar Week had rolled around, so I brought a copy of the story with me to New York and dropped it off at Dell Magazines’office on Park Avenue for Linda Landrigan at Hitchcock. (photo credit: Jiro Kimura at The Gumshoe Site) The next day, I had lunch with Linda, who is one of the sweetest women on earth, and her young and sassy assistant editor, Nicole Sia.
Nicole Sia

During lunch, they both bemoaned the fact that they had been seeing a slew of stories about men abusing women. Not a good sign. My murderer beat his wife.

I have a special place in my heart for Linda. She’s the one who rescued me off the slush pile when she was Cathleen Jordan’s assistant at AHMM. I had a feeling I was letting her down badly by offering her a story about a serial baby killer.

The weeks passed. And to my complete surprise, Linda bought the story.

I guess it wasn’t too much of a cliché.

And then, the biggest surprise of all. The first commissioned cover in a long time, just for my story.

See what I mean when I say, “You never can tell”?

Posted in The Scribbler on August 20th, 2007
RSS 2.0 Both comments and pings are currently closed.

5 comments

  1. August 20th, 2007 at 2:12 pm, Rob Lopresti Says:

    Fascinating stuff, Jim, and thanks for writing it (and yes, Linda is a complete sweetheart).

    I have already said I liked your story a lot, but I would have been happier without the cop’s personal connection to the crime (i.e. dead child in his past). To my mind the currently popular “this time it’s personal” element, in which every detective seems to only investigate crimes involving friends, relatives or personal bad memories, is way overworked. (Hey, maybe that’s my next blog entry…)
    But a good, surprising story, for sure, for sure…

  2. August 20th, 2007 at 2:54 pm, Deborah Says:

    Every child murdered makes it personal. I think that’s why child murderers don’t fare well when they reach prison. As far as “Texas Ruby” being named for a grapefruit, that is not so. The murder happens in Texas, the girl is named Ruby and the media (not me!) gave her the name because it fit nicely in the headlines. Just because I wrote the story and invented the media does not mean it wasn’t a good title. (Not that an editor doesn’t have the choice to change said title when they publish it.)

  3. August 20th, 2007 at 4:35 pm, JLW Says:

    “Texas Ruby” is a damn good story, Deb, and I told you so and I still think so–but the “Texas Ruby” grapefruit has been grown in the Rio Grande Valley since 1929, and it’s been the official fruit of Texas since 1993. (There was a great article in Texas Highways listing all the recognized symbols of our home state earlier this year–my sentimental favorite is the Official Small Mammal, the armadillo.) There was also the famous Grand Ole Opry duo of Texas Ruby and Curly Fox in the 40s and 50s, but the grapefruit came first.

    In any case, I deeply apologize if my comment seemed like a cheap shot. I didn’t mean it that way.

    Rob, I completely agree that the “This time, it’s personal” aspect–hell, almost every independent element of “WtWB”: the damaged hero, the psychotic killer, the officious boss–is overworked in the genre, hence my nervousness over its sale.

  4. August 20th, 2007 at 9:12 pm, Deborah Says:

    No worries, JLW. I have a thick skin when it comes to writing. I just wanted to clear up the “why” I chose that title. Yes, you are right about grapefruit, etc. When “Texas Ruby” sells, I won’t cry if they decide to change the title. But then, there will be the inevitable I told you so to deal with, eh? Like Liberace, I shall cry all the way to the bank. :-)

  5. August 21st, 2007 at 3:22 am, rob lopresti Says:

    Deborah wrote: “Every child murdered makes it personal.”

    Hell yes to that. Good point.

« Sunday, August 19: The A.D.D. Detective Tuesday, August 21: High-Heeled Gumshoe »

The Sidebar

  • Lex Artis

      Crippen & Landru
      Futures Mystery   Anthology   Magazine
      Homeville
      The Mystery   Place
      Short Mystery   Fiction Society
      The Strand   Magazine
  • Amicae Curiae

      J.F. Benedetto
      Jan Burke
      Bill Crider
      CrimeSpace
      Dave's Fiction   Warehouse
      Emerald City
      Martin Edwards
      The Gumshoe Site
      Michael Haskins
      _holm
      Killer Hobbies
      Miss Begotten
      Murderati
      Murderous Musings
      Mysterious   Issues
      MWA
      The Rap Sheet
      Sandra Seamans
      Sweet Home   Alameda
      Women of   Mystery
      Louis Willis
  • Filed Briefs

    • Bandersnatches (226)
    • De Novo Review (10)
    • Femme Fatale (224)
    • From the Gallery (3)
    • High-Heeled Gumshoe (151)
    • Miscellany (2)
    • Mississippi Mud (192)
    • Mystery Masterclass (91)
    • New York Minute (21)
    • Spirit of the Law (18)
    • Surprise Witness (46)
    • The A.D.D. Detective (228)
    • The Scribbler (204)
    • Tune It Or Die! (224)
  • Legal Archives

    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
Criminal Brief: The Mystery Short Story Web Log Project - Copyright 2011 by the respective authors. All rights reserved.
Opinions expressed are solely those of the author expressing them, and do not reflect the positions of CriminalBrief.com.