The Docket

  • MONDAY:

    The Scribbler

    James Lincoln Warren

  • MONDAY:

    Spirit of the Law

    Janice Law

  • TUESDAY:

    High-Heeled Gumshoe

    Melodie Johnson Howe

  • WEDNESDAY:

    Tune It Or Die!

    Robert Lopresti

  • THURSDAY:

    Femme Fatale

    Deborah
    Elliott-Upton

  • FRIDAY:

    Bander- snatches

    Steven Steinbock

  • SATURDAY:

    Mississippi Mud

    John M. Floyd

  • SATURDAY:

    New York Minute

    Angela Zeman

  • SUNDAY:

    The A.D.D. Detective

    Leigh Lundin

  • AD HOC:

    Mystery Masterclass

    Distinguished Guest Contributors

  • AD HOC:

    Surprise Witness

    Guest Blogger

  • Aural Argument

    "The Sack 'Em Up Men"

    "Crow's Avenue"

    "The Stain"

    "Jumpin' Jack Flash"

    "The Art of the Short Story"

    "Bouchercon 2010 Short Story Panel"

Thursday, November 20: Femme Fatale

IT’S ALL CHEMISTRY

by Deborah Elliott-Upton

Basically, chemistry is taking specific elements and combining them with others and waiting for the reactant to create a new product. Add something to something else, add some heat or cold. Use a catalyst. Follow precise rules and you will achieve a specific result or product. Change the procedure by adding a new element or a new method of mixing and something may ignite or even explode.

Chemistry between people can be sizzling hot, lukewarm or frigid.

As Truman Capote said concerning the two killers he immortalized in his true crime novelization, In Cold Blood, probably neither of the two men separately would have committed the murders, but together they formed another personality who would.

How many times has the public been amazed at who serial killers turn out to be in real life? Ted Bundy was a good-looking guy who most women would have wanted to date. The BTK killer, although known as a grouch, wasn’t suspected by his neighbors of the heinous crimes until Johnny Law came to his door with shiny new bracelets for him to wear. Obviously, Lizzie Borden’s jury did not believe she could have so cold-bloodedly killed her parents.

Albert Einstein said, “Fear or stupidity has always been the basis of most human actions.” I think he had a point. Most crimes are committed not by those who carefully plan and execute a flawless crime, but rather done on the spur of the moment and certainly with not enough thought beforehand. Cops are always saying criminals are stupid. There’s even been TV programs showing us how easily criminals lead police to them by doing something any criminal worthy of writing a mystery about would not do.

“Why do writers write? Because it isn’t there.” – Thomas Berger

I’ve always said I enjoy planning murders, thefts, and ultimately, the perfect crime. I just don’t want to end up in jail doing time. Writing mysteries seemed a method to “live” a life of crime without ever getting caught, locating a bondsman for bail or sitting in the defendant’s chair of a courtroom.

I enjoy the art of detecting truth from lies. I’m not so great doing this in the real world, but within my character’s mindset, I am quite good at getting to the truth during an investigation. Catching criminals is nothing I’ll ever do except within the pages of a story where I can control the outcome. I am in awe of those law enforcement officers who are the real experts and share some of their information with me and other readers.

“The art and science of asking questions is the source of all knowledge.” – Thomas Berger

So, what makes one resort to criminal pursuits? Poverty, jealousy, rage are all reasons listed on a police report, but most likely it may be traced back to low self-esteem. It’s hard to feel like you’re important if the rent’s due, your laid-off and your spouse has left you. Are these valid reasons to commit a crime? Not really. Lots of people in the same circumstances do not embezzle, blackmail or mug an innocent person on the street.

Why are we fascinated with the stories? Do you like to plan out the crimes like I do? Or solve them before the detective in the story may? Is it keeping your brain attentive to clues carefully placed? Or is the time you spend reading merely a form of entertainment to help you escape for a few minutes?

Why are we reading mysteries and why do we prefer the ones we do? Are you a cozy reader, a police procedural fan or one who sits on the edge of his seat for a thriller?

“To raise new questions, new possibilities, to regard old problems from a new angle, requires creative imagination and marks real advance in science.” – Albert Einstein

When I meet people, they invariably guess I write romances. A second guess is children’s books. When I say I write murder mysteries, some of them back away a bit as if I were a real criminal and my “bad thoughts” would rub off on them. One even said, “Aren’t you afraid you might give a criminal an idea how to commit a crime or even”—at this point she actually shuddered—“a murder?”

I probably didn’t have the best reaction, because I smiled and she left rather quickly. My husband says I’m a bit wicked. Maybe he’s right, but I’m having the time of my life. Maybe it’s due to the chemistry between my mom and dad resulted in me being me.

Science is not without some startling accidents that have proven to be good for humanity. Maybe the chemistry between writer and reader is the catalyst for time well spent.

Posted in Femme Fatale on November 20th, 2008
RSS 2.0 Both comments and pings are currently closed.

6 comments

  1. November 20th, 2008 at 1:15 pm, Dick Stodghill Says:

    Years covering the criminal courts made me aware that major career criminals do it for the thrills, the excitement, the adventure. Dillinger and his companions were examples of that mindset, as was mystery writer Al Nussbaum. When asked if he enjoyed writing, I once heard him reply, “It’s OK, but what I’d really like to be doing is robbing banks.” After making the FBI’s 10-Most-Wanted list and years in places like Alcatraz he knew he no longer could get away with it. Another of his all-too-true remarks: “You can’t rehabilitate someone who wasn’t habilitated to begin with.”

  2. November 20th, 2008 at 6:32 pm, alisa Says:

    You ARE wicked! I am waiting for you and the Cowboy Cop (from NM) to put your heads together and write a thriller to die for. :-)

    Enjoyed the article. I think Capote saw himself way to much in his In Cold Blood for many reasons.

  3. November 20th, 2008 at 7:10 pm, jaharrismd Says:

    “Aren’t you afraid you might give a criminal an idea how to commit a crime…”

    People said that of D. B. Cooper, the man who hijacked a Boeing 727 in 1971, received $200,000 in ransom, and parachuted from the plane with the money in hand. The FBI believes Cooper did not survive, but have no evidence for their notion. Recently someone found an old rotten parachute in the area where he jumped, but an “old parachute expert” examined it and concluded it couldn’t have been Cooper’s. That event was the beginning of airplane hijackings, and many have accused Cooper of planting the seed in the minds of copycats who tried to emulate his success.

    I think the idea planters like D. B. (and Deborah) are the reason we must spend millions of man hours per year (are there woman hours?) waiting in airport security lines, removing our shoes, and having a Darth Vader security sword thrust at our genitals by uniformed fat people.

  4. November 20th, 2008 at 9:53 pm, Deborah Says:

    I heard Stephen King personally removed one of his books from the public because it was eerily close to a how-to commit a school shooting previous to the Columbine tragedy. Unfortunately, humans have always been copy-cats. I do think hijacking has been going on long before D.B. Cooper and that not him nor I or other writers, but the 9/11 terrorists instilled the need for more security at airports. On another note, I have not figured out why I am one of those chosen and pulled aside for one of those “more personal” checks by an airport security guard. Either I look guilty or extremely safe so I must be guilty.

  5. November 22nd, 2008 at 2:58 am, Jeff Baker Says:

    Most of the ex-criminals (who had been caught) that I met later in their lives were upfront about being stupid. (Say it again, Stupid!!!) The crook who plans carefully and gets away with it untill caught is largely fictional. But we read about them because we want to solve the puzzle, walk in someone else’s shoes and, I firmly believe we read and love mysteries for one other reason, we want justice to prevail in the end.

  6. November 23rd, 2008 at 3:40 pm, Travis Erwin Says:

    The problem with committing the perfect crime is that people want to start bragging about how smart they are and once you open you mouth you are gonna get caught. This Debbie is why you could never commit the perfect crime and get away with it. Like me, you like to talk way to much to avoid capture. Hell. we’d write a damn story about it.

« Wednesday, November 19: Tune It Or Die! Friday, November 21: Bandersnatches »

The Sidebar

  • Lex Artis

      Crippen & Landru
      Futures Mystery   Anthology   Magazine
      Homeville
      The Mystery   Place
      Short Mystery   Fiction Society
      The Strand   Magazine
  • Amicae Curiae

      J.F. Benedetto
      Jan Burke
      Bill Crider
      CrimeSpace
      Dave's Fiction   Warehouse
      Emerald City
      Martin Edwards
      The Gumshoe Site
      Michael Haskins
      _holm
      Killer Hobbies
      Miss Begotten
      Murderati
      Murderous Musings
      Mysterious   Issues
      MWA
      The Rap Sheet
      Sandra Seamans
      Sweet Home   Alameda
      Women of   Mystery
      Louis Willis
  • Filed Briefs

    • Bandersnatches (226)
    • De Novo Review (10)
    • Femme Fatale (224)
    • From the Gallery (3)
    • High-Heeled Gumshoe (151)
    • Miscellany (2)
    • Mississippi Mud (192)
    • Mystery Masterclass (91)
    • New York Minute (21)
    • Spirit of the Law (18)
    • Surprise Witness (46)
    • The A.D.D. Detective (228)
    • The Scribbler (204)
    • Tune It Or Die! (224)
  • Legal Archives

    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
Criminal Brief: The Mystery Short Story Web Log Project - Copyright 2011 by the respective authors. All rights reserved.
Opinions expressed are solely those of the author expressing them, and do not reflect the positions of CriminalBrief.com.