Saturday, May 9: Mississippi Mud
OPEN UP — IT’S THE GRAMMAR POLICE
by John M. Floyd
A couple of years ago I saw an interesting list in a writing magazine. I can’t recall which magazine it was or who wrote the piece, but since I remember most of the items in the list I don’t think I dreamed it — mainly because my dreams don’t usually make a lot of sense, and this list did. Besides, most of my dreams involve being chased by demons or having to take a test I’m not prepared for or certain fantasies I won’t go into here.
The piece I saw was interesting to me because it named the top seven grammatical errors that editors find in manuscripts. Since I’ve already admitted at least partial amnesia here, it won’t surprise you that I also don’t remember all of the errors or the order in which they appeared — so my plan is to fudge a little and substitute some of my own. I feel that’s only fair, since I’ve almost certainly committed more of these mistakes than the guy who wrote the article, and I’ve probably had more manuscripts rejected as a result.
Anyway, here’s my list. I’ll call them my Top Ten Most Irritating Grammar Mistakes, beginning with the worst.
NOTE: I’ve left out some obvious style errors like overuse of adverbs/adjectives, misspellings, repetition of thoughts/words/phrases, etc. The following is a list of specific errors that I find the most offensive, and which I honestly believe can mark a writer as an amateur (or just plain careless).
1. Its time to give the dog it’s medicine. I think the misuse if it’s/its takes the prize for Worst Writing Error. I realize most possessives include an apostrophe, but we should know by now that its doesn’t. And that it’s is a contraction.
2. The invitation was sent to Mary and I. When spoken this is bad enough; when written it’s terrible. Break it up into parts — would you write “to I”?
3. Their mailbox says THE COOPER’S. This isn’t a possessive (even though it probably is the Coopers’ mailbox). The word should be a simple plural, with no apostrophe: THE COOPERS.
4. Would everyone please take their seats? Okay, I know it’s not PC to say “his seat,” and I know it’s cumbersome to say “his or her seat.” But “their” is just wrong. One way around this is rephrasing: Would everyone please sit down?
5. We had less people attend last week’s meeting. Use fewer when individual “units” are involved. “I have less cash; I have fewer coins.”
6. I need to lay down for a while. To say that’s correct would be a lie. You lay down a pallet; you lie down to rest.
7. He went in the tunnel. Unless maybe you’re saying he used the bathroom in the tunnel, this is incorrect. It should be: “He went into the tunnel; he’s in the tunnel now.” True story: I saw in our local newspaper the other day that a suspect “turned himself into police.” It’s bad grammar, but sounds like a good escape maneuver …
8. He doesn’t draw good. Remember, “good” is usually an adjective; “well” is usually an adverb. “He doesn’t draw good pictures because he doesn’t draw well.”
9. I feel badly about that. The only way to feel badly is to have problems with your sense of touch. Just say you feel bad. To feel badly about something is as wrong as to feel goodly about it.
10. She told me that she likes you. This isn’t really incorrect, it’s just too wordy. We writers should try to cut out every unnecessary occurrence of that. “She told me she likes you” sounds much better.
A good runner-up would be My wife is nauseous. Your wife might indeed be nauseous, but you probably meant to indicate that she’s throwing up her shoes and socks. If so, the correct word is nauseated. I once heard that “The patient is nauseated” means he’s sick; “The patient is nauseous” means he’s making you sick.
Again, I’ve left out many classic mistakes — these are just some that come readily to mind, and that appear often in the manuscripts I critique in my writing classes. What are the errors that you consider the most appalling? (Aside from those that some of you might have noticed in my e-mails.)
I should end this discussion by confessing that I’m actually not much of a grammar policeman. (Several of my Criminal Brief colleagues, however, are. Especially JLW.) But it’s fun now and then to impersonate one.
“Okay, sir, step away from the desk, and put down that pen …”
A writing teacher told us once that “that” is like scaffolding. No one once to see it once the building is finished.
The mention of grammar police scared me and yet I took the test and had a score of 85. Had I done as well in school I might not have quit. Maybe I should be given a 90 because both 4 and 10 are iffy. Think I’d rewrite 4, but that “that” could be a problem.
A managing editor once sat me down for a fifteen minute lecture on it’s and its. It stuck in my mind. A wire editor who was a stickler for grammar constantly berated the rest of about “that.” Our stories needed more of them. I’m still shaky on the subject.
The pot and kettle keep me from offering criticisms of my own, although seen instead of saw makes me shudder.
The current photo of JLW pasted to the upper left corner of a computer monitor would cause any writer to take care of his grammar. The eyes are watching and he’s ready to pounce. Great picture.
I like the writing teacher’s analogy. And yes, the “that” issue is iffy. As for phrases like “everybody does their own thing,” Dick, I’ve heard it will eventually be considered correct because of our phobia about (not) using the word “his.” As we’ve said before, our language is evolving.
I haven’t had any trouble with “it’s” since someone pointed out that if you can substitute “his” it doesn’t take the apostrophe.
Actually, the “singular their” has a long history in English, dating back to the 14th century, and has been used with impunity by many of the great writers in English literature, including Fielding (e.g., from Tom Jones: “Every one in the House were in their Beds”), Goldsmith, Thackeray, Austen, Shaw, and many others. There is nothing new about it at all and it didn’t arise as a response to feminism.
While it may be logically wrong, it has been standard English for hundreds of years. Personally, I don’t care for it, but grammarians who persecute the user on account of it are being over zealous.
Thanks! For years I’ve caught myself flubbing the placement of the apostrophie in surnames that end with an “s.” For that, I bless my backspace key!
I realize the “singular their” isn’t new — I just think it sounds wrong, and has sounded wrong for a long time. I’ve often heard, though, that it might be more universally accepted in the future due to the clumsiness of saying “his or her” or (ugh) “his/her.” Whatever the case, I agree with JLW that whoever uses it should probably not be horsewhipped or waterboarded. At least not at the same time.
As for using a possessive when a simple plural is needed, there’s a sign in a storefront about a mile from our house that says (I kid you not) FRESH TOMATO’S. Good grief.
Great list, John. I’m pasting this one near my desk. The only thing missing is the double copula!
And on a tangent, I picked up a copy of Midnight and read the first five stories in one sitting. Great stuff. I want to talk to you, John, about fathers’ accomplishments. There’s an interesting theme running through (at least) two of the stories.
Fathers and Sons? Turgenev is one of my heroes.
An office acquaintance used to carry on a secondary conversation if you listened closely:
“Do you feel good?”
“In places.”
“Is Edna ’round?”
“She sure is.”
Me and Mary appreciate the tips.
Steve — Many thanks, for your kind words! Hope you enjoy the book.