The Docket

  • MONDAY:

    The Scribbler

    James Lincoln Warren

  • MONDAY:

    Spirit of the Law

    Janice Law

  • TUESDAY:

    High-Heeled Gumshoe

    Melodie Johnson Howe

  • WEDNESDAY:

    Tune It Or Die!

    Robert Lopresti

  • THURSDAY:

    Femme Fatale

    Deborah
    Elliott-Upton

  • FRIDAY:

    Bander- snatches

    Steven Steinbock

  • SATURDAY:

    Mississippi Mud

    John M. Floyd

  • SATURDAY:

    New York Minute

    Angela Zeman

  • SUNDAY:

    The A.D.D. Detective

    Leigh Lundin

  • AD HOC:

    Mystery Masterclass

    Distinguished Guest Contributors

  • AD HOC:

    Surprise Witness

    Guest Blogger

  • Aural Argument

    "The Sack 'Em Up Men"

    "Crow's Avenue"

    "The Stain"

    "Jumpin' Jack Flash"

    "The Art of the Short Story"

    "Bouchercon 2010 Short Story Panel"

Monday, May 11: The Scribbler

CRIMINAL BRIEF ENCOUNTER

by James Lincoln Warren

recruiting_poster

Ever since I first conceived of Criminal Brief, it has been my fervent desire to encourage as much reader participation as possible, even beyond trying to stimulate responses to our posts. CB was first and foremost intended as an advocacy site for short crime fiction, a voice for encouraging people to read short stories—although I freely admit that we can travel all over the map in serving that goal. To me, advocacy has always meant engaging the Gentle Readers and giving them the opportunity to contribute in whatever manner possible to the Cause.

In its first incarnation, CB had a feature called “Instant Reviews” (which later morphed into “De Novo Review” in keeping with my preference for naming every feature on the site after some legal term or court proceeding) that allowed anyone who wanted to share their opinions a means for recommending their favorite stories to the CB readership. At first it was quite popular, but it shortly fizzled, so that the only folks adding reviews seemed to be the regular CB columnists. Eventually, I conceded defeat and removed the feature, keeping “De Novo Review” as a column category for guest columnists who wanted to write criticism.

But now, with the consent of the staff, I am trying again. This time, however, rather than limiting reader participation to the submission of reviews of short stories, I’m opening the discussion to any topic a reader would like to contribute. In other words, Criminal Brief is opening up to unsolicited submissions of columns by readers. In the Sidebar at right, you will notice a new box: “Rules of Court”. Within the box is a link called “Submission Guidelines”, which will lead the reader to a page describing what we’re looking for, what we’re not looking for, and how to submit articles to me for consideration.

There are essentially three categories open for contribution:

  • Mystery Masterclass: This category is restricted to professional writers. By “professional”, I mean a writer who has been paid by an editor, publisher, or producer for contributing a manuscript that was published or produced. The form of publication or production isn’t relevant as long as there was money paid for the manuscript, i.e., web publication, ebook publication, film and television, radio, and traditional markets are all included. This category is not open for contributions by the self-published.
  • De Novo Review: This category is open to all readers who wish to submit a review of a work relevant to short crime fiction. Reviews of novels are generally not acceptable, unless there is a clear nexus to short crime fiction. Self-promotion is expressly forbidden.
  • From the Gallery: This new category is open to fans to write about anything they’d like to get off their chests, as long as it is of interest to the readership and has some relevance to the mystery short story. Polemics and gossip are not allowed.

This is an experiment. If it works, we’ll try to publish at least one to four unsolicited columns every month. If it doesn’t work, just remember that we want to hear from you and are grateful for your participation.

Posted in The Scribbler on May 11th, 2009
RSS 2.0 Both comments and pings are currently closed.

3 comments

  1. May 11th, 2009 at 1:47 pm, Rob Says:

    James, you probably get tired of hearing us say this, but I just want to thank you for all the hard work you do on this site, including thinking up great new ideas like this.

    And as for you readers, now is your chance to join us columnists in our fame and fortune.

  2. May 11th, 2009 at 9:30 pm, Dick Stodghill Says:

    Rob, do you think we could make this a joint venture? You get the fame, I get the fortune.

  3. May 12th, 2009 at 4:41 am, Rob Says:

    I could say something about getting the joint but I don’t eat roast beef anymore.

« Sunday, May 10: The A.D.D. Detective Tuesday, May 12: High-Heeled Gumshoe »

The Sidebar

  • Lex Artis

      Crippen & Landru
      Futures Mystery   Anthology   Magazine
      Homeville
      The Mystery   Place
      Short Mystery   Fiction Society
      The Strand   Magazine
  • Amicae Curiae

      J.F. Benedetto
      Jan Burke
      Bill Crider
      CrimeSpace
      Dave's Fiction   Warehouse
      Emerald City
      Martin Edwards
      The Gumshoe Site
      Michael Haskins
      _holm
      Killer Hobbies
      Miss Begotten
      Murderati
      Murderous Musings
      Mysterious   Issues
      MWA
      The Rap Sheet
      Sandra Seamans
      Sweet Home   Alameda
      Women of   Mystery
      Louis Willis
  • Filed Briefs

    • Bandersnatches (226)
    • De Novo Review (10)
    • Femme Fatale (224)
    • From the Gallery (3)
    • High-Heeled Gumshoe (151)
    • Miscellany (2)
    • Mississippi Mud (192)
    • Mystery Masterclass (91)
    • New York Minute (21)
    • Spirit of the Law (18)
    • Surprise Witness (46)
    • The A.D.D. Detective (228)
    • The Scribbler (204)
    • Tune It Or Die! (224)
  • Legal Archives

    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
Criminal Brief: The Mystery Short Story Web Log Project - Copyright 2011 by the respective authors. All rights reserved.
Opinions expressed are solely those of the author expressing them, and do not reflect the positions of CriminalBrief.com.