The Docket

  • MONDAY:

    The Scribbler

    James Lincoln Warren

  • MONDAY:

    Spirit of the Law

    Janice Law

  • TUESDAY:

    High-Heeled Gumshoe

    Melodie Johnson Howe

  • WEDNESDAY:

    Tune It Or Die!

    Robert Lopresti

  • THURSDAY:

    Femme Fatale

    Deborah
    Elliott-Upton

  • FRIDAY:

    Bander- snatches

    Steven Steinbock

  • SATURDAY:

    Mississippi Mud

    John M. Floyd

  • SATURDAY:

    New York Minute

    Angela Zeman

  • SUNDAY:

    The A.D.D. Detective

    Leigh Lundin

  • AD HOC:

    Mystery Masterclass

    Distinguished Guest Contributors

  • AD HOC:

    Surprise Witness

    Guest Blogger

  • Aural Argument

    "The Sack 'Em Up Men"

    "Crow's Avenue"

    "The Stain"

    "Jumpin' Jack Flash"

    "The Art of the Short Story"

    "Bouchercon 2010 Short Story Panel"

Sunday, June 14: The A.D.D. Detective

NUMB3RS, Part 3: MYSTERY GIFT

by Leigh Lundin

Friends Claire, Judy, and Sharon sent along a magic trick and wondered how it worked. In previous columns (here and here), I revealed the mysteries of a couple of puzzling tricks, so I tackled today’s with interest.

Many similar tricks use mathematical properties, but today’s problem uses nothing beyond fourth grade math. Instead, this trick relies on a little psychology and a lot of magician’s misdirection.

Here, the computer is the magician. She tells you to pick any two-digit number, like choosing two playing cards from a deck. The magician knows the first number (or card) will be 1-9 and the second will be 0-9, but she doesn’t know the specific digits you choose.

The magician tells you to subtract the first and second digits from your original number, and she provides a helpful example 25 – 2 – 5 = 18.

But wait: 22 – 2 – 2 = 18 and 29 – 2 – 9 = 18! What’s going on here?

Let’s say you choose your favorite birthday:

2 1
tens units

We’ll break this down into separate steps so you can see how it works. We’ll subtract the second digit, which means the magician just made you throw away a card!

2 _
tens units

Because you have only one card left and it’s in the tens position, we’re left with nothing in the units position– it’s actually a zero, always a zero. The magician now knows you will have either 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and nothing else.

2 0
tens units

That’s too easy and you’d catch on what’s happening, so the magician tells you to subtract the first digit from the number. The magician knows the result can be only 9, 18, 27, 36, 45, 54, 63, 72, or 81.

1 8
tens units

Try any number, and you’ll see what I mean– you’ll always end up with one of these nine numbers. You can verify it here as we do the math:

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
-1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9
09 18 27 36 45 54 63 72 81

The magician doesn’t care what numbers you started with because she’s manipulated you into giving her one of nine numbers, while letting you think you’re in control.

Next, the magician shows you 99 boxes and instructs you to identify the gift associated with ‘your’ number (which is no longer yours, but hers). She’s filled all but nine of the boxes with random gift items. The magician makes certain the other nine contain the same gift– that’s right you guessed: box numbers 9, 18, 27, 36, 45, 54, 63, 72, and 81. None of the other ninety boxes matter.

So, upon any given play, all of those nine key boxes will contain the same item– whether it be fruitcake, bunny slippers, or another gift– but the items will be identical in those nine key boxes.

The magician uses one other trick so you don’t become suspicious. You might notice the same items in a diagonal, if the magician listed the items in a 10×10 grid like this:

   10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
1 11 21 31 41 51 61 71 81 91
2 12 22 32 42 52 62 72 82 92
3 13 23 33 43 53 63 73 83 93
4 14 24 34 44 54 64 74 84 94
5 15 25 35 45 55 65 75 85 95
6 16 26 36 46 56 66 76 86 96
7 17 27 37 47 57 67 77 87 97
8 18 28 38 48 58 68 78 88 98
9 19 29 39 49 59 69 79 89 99

To obscure how simple the trick is, the magician shows us a 9×11 grid, which makes the pattern more difficult to discern:

1 12 23 34 45 56 67 78 89   
2 13 24 35 46 57 68 79 90   
3 14 25 36 47 58 69 80 91   
4 15 26 37 48 59 70 81 92   
5 16 27 38 49 60 71 82 93   
6 17 28 39 50 61 72 83 94   
7 18 29 40 51 62 73 84 95   
8 19 30 41 52 63 74 85 96   
9 20 31 42 53 64 75 86 97   
10 21 32 43 54 65 76 87 98   
11 22 33 44 55 66 77 88 99   

Finally, we click NEXT so the magician can reveal her answer:

See? A little psychology, a lot of magical misdirection, and that’s how the trick is done!

Wine, Women, and Mystery

We were shocked to learn there’re other distaff writers beyond our favorite WOMEN OF MYSTERY. If you’re in New York City today, join Ellery Queen‘s editors, writers, and fans an evening of readings by favorite female mystery authors.

Authors Meredith Anthony, SJ Rozan, Sarah Weinman and Elizabeth Zelvin will read excerpts from their EQMM stories at New York City’s KGB Bar.

Posted in The A.D.D. Detective on June 14th, 2009
RSS 2.0 Both comments and pings are currently closed.

4 comments

  1. June 14th, 2009 at 6:33 pm, Dick Stodghill Says:

    My math stops at the third grade level so you lost me. I hope you saw the Inspector Lewis program on the PBS Mystery series last night. The major clue concerned “perfect” numbers so I struggled all the way, and now this.
    If you liked Inspector Morse, starting next week they are going to show the series again.

  2. June 14th, 2009 at 8:18 pm, Louis Says:

    I can’t do crossword puzzles and number puzzles give me a headache. I tried the first one, and it was fun. I got lost trying the second one. My math skills aren’t up to the task.

  3. June 15th, 2009 at 2:55 am, alisa Says:

    I can see why Velma makes you do your own work.

  4. June 15th, 2009 at 3:44 am, shron Says:

    So if it’s up to us, criminals should drop only mathematical clues and they’ll be safe.

« Saturday, June 13: Mississippi Mud Monday, June 15: Mystery Masterclass »

The Sidebar

  • Lex Artis

      Crippen & Landru
      Futures Mystery   Anthology   Magazine
      Homeville
      The Mystery   Place
      Short Mystery   Fiction Society
      The Strand   Magazine
  • Amicae Curiae

      J.F. Benedetto
      Jan Burke
      Bill Crider
      CrimeSpace
      Dave's Fiction   Warehouse
      Emerald City
      Martin Edwards
      The Gumshoe Site
      Michael Haskins
      _holm
      Killer Hobbies
      Miss Begotten
      Murderati
      Murderous Musings
      Mysterious   Issues
      MWA
      The Rap Sheet
      Sandra Seamans
      Sweet Home   Alameda
      Women of   Mystery
      Louis Willis
  • Filed Briefs

    • Bandersnatches (226)
    • De Novo Review (10)
    • Femme Fatale (224)
    • From the Gallery (3)
    • High-Heeled Gumshoe (151)
    • Miscellany (2)
    • Mississippi Mud (192)
    • Mystery Masterclass (91)
    • New York Minute (21)
    • Spirit of the Law (18)
    • Surprise Witness (46)
    • The A.D.D. Detective (228)
    • The Scribbler (204)
    • Tune It Or Die! (224)
  • Legal Archives

    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
Criminal Brief: The Mystery Short Story Web Log Project - Copyright 2011 by the respective authors. All rights reserved.
Opinions expressed are solely those of the author expressing them, and do not reflect the positions of CriminalBrief.com.