The Docket

  • MONDAY:

    The Scribbler

    James Lincoln Warren

  • MONDAY:

    Spirit of the Law

    Janice Law

  • TUESDAY:

    High-Heeled Gumshoe

    Melodie Johnson Howe

  • WEDNESDAY:

    Tune It Or Die!

    Robert Lopresti

  • THURSDAY:

    Femme Fatale

    Deborah
    Elliott-Upton

  • FRIDAY:

    Bander- snatches

    Steven Steinbock

  • SATURDAY:

    Mississippi Mud

    John M. Floyd

  • SATURDAY:

    New York Minute

    Angela Zeman

  • SUNDAY:

    The A.D.D. Detective

    Leigh Lundin

  • AD HOC:

    Mystery Masterclass

    Distinguished Guest Contributors

  • AD HOC:

    Surprise Witness

    Guest Blogger

  • Aural Argument

    "The Sack 'Em Up Men"

    "Crow's Avenue"

    "The Stain"

    "Jumpin' Jack Flash"

    "The Art of the Short Story"

    "Bouchercon 2010 Short Story Panel"

Saturday, May 3: Mississippi Mud

WHY WON’T JOHNNY READ?

by John M. Floyd

A pro-literacy phrase that I remember from my childhood was one I never liked, back then. It popped up a lot, in everything from magazines to newscasts: Why can’t Johnny read? I of course didn’t like the question because everyone called me Johnny as a kid, and by jiminy, I could read.

The SopranosThese days the phrase is no longer as applicable, I suppose, since most Johnnys can read, but there’s arguably a bigger problem now: many of them don’t want to. And it’s not just Johnny– it’s his whole family.

My non-reader friends don’t seem to understand my concern. They say they don’t dislike reading; some say they even enjoy it now and then. It’s just that they “don’t have the time.” Well, excuse me, but I don’t think that holds water. If they have time to watch a TV program (and I hesitate to imagine which ones they do watch), then they have time to read. Besides that, if they really enjoyed it, they would make the time. I don’t get upset about it anymore, but I do feel a little sorry for them. They don’t realize what they’re missing.

Let me admit here that I have no statistics for all this. Maybe non-readers aren’t as big a group as I suspect they are. But I’ve spent a lot of time in bookstores these past few years, both as a signer and as a customer, and when I watch the area just outside a mall bookstore, the vast majority of passersby … pass by. Only a small percentage stop and come inside. Lost(Many of those who do enter the store go straight to the cookbook section or to the racing magazines and never look at anything else, but don’t get me started on that.) Some passersby– especially young people– even seem to move over to the other side of the walkway until they’re clear, as if the store contained Kryptonite instead of books. I have a feeling you wouldn’t see the same phenomenon outside a store that sells music or videos.

Again, I realize these observations are unscientific, and don’t even include libraries or standalone bookstores, where you don’t easily notice how many people pass them by. But assuming for a minute that my suspicions are valid, why is this happening? Why doesn’t a larger chunk of our population enjoy books, and reading?

All of us know the standard answer: We have more activities and gadgets competing for our time lately, certainly more than ever before. (And I’m as guilty as anyone, there. I’m not only a movie fanatic, I love music and even some TV shows: “Lost”, “24”, “The Sopranos”, a few others.) More serious than our alternative entertainment sources, though, is the fact that fewer parents are reading to their kids these days, and I swear some of the books I’ve seen on schoolchildren’s reading lists are enough to turn them against fiction rather than encourage them. Bottom line is, fewer kids are being exposed to good reading. J.K. Rowling has done much to turn the tide, but she can’t do it all by herself.

24So what can we do to help? Well, as obvious and trivial as it sounds, we as writers can try to create tales that are interesting and worthwhile, and as readers and parents and teachers we can support libraries and book groups, and point others– especially youngsters– to stories we’ve enjoyed as well as stories we’ve not yet read. And, of course, all of us can switch off our electronic gadgets a little more often.

Unless a rerun of “24” is on …

Posted in Mississippi Mud on May 3rd, 2008
RSS 2.0 Both comments and pings are currently closed.

One comments

  1. May 4th, 2008 at 4:36 am, Leigh Says:

    Please note that commenting software is temporary broken.

« Friday, May 2: Bandersnatches Sunday, May 4: The A.D.D. Detective »

The Sidebar

  • Lex Artis

      Crippen & Landru
      Futures Mystery   Anthology   Magazine
      Homeville
      The Mystery   Place
      Short Mystery   Fiction Society
      The Strand   Magazine
  • Amicae Curiae

      J.F. Benedetto
      Jan Burke
      Bill Crider
      CrimeSpace
      Dave's Fiction   Warehouse
      Emerald City
      Martin Edwards
      The Gumshoe Site
      Michael Haskins
      _holm
      Killer Hobbies
      Miss Begotten
      Murderati
      Murderous Musings
      Mysterious   Issues
      MWA
      The Rap Sheet
      Sandra Seamans
      Sweet Home   Alameda
      Women of   Mystery
      Louis Willis
  • Filed Briefs

    • Bandersnatches (226)
    • De Novo Review (10)
    • Femme Fatale (224)
    • From the Gallery (3)
    • High-Heeled Gumshoe (151)
    • Miscellany (2)
    • Mississippi Mud (192)
    • Mystery Masterclass (91)
    • New York Minute (21)
    • Spirit of the Law (18)
    • Surprise Witness (46)
    • The A.D.D. Detective (228)
    • The Scribbler (204)
    • Tune It Or Die! (224)
  • Legal Archives

    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
Criminal Brief: The Mystery Short Story Web Log Project - Copyright 2011 by the respective authors. All rights reserved.
Opinions expressed are solely those of the author expressing them, and do not reflect the positions of CriminalBrief.com.