The Docket

  • MONDAY:

    The Scribbler

    James Lincoln Warren

  • MONDAY:

    Spirit of the Law

    Janice Law

  • TUESDAY:

    High-Heeled Gumshoe

    Melodie Johnson Howe

  • WEDNESDAY:

    Tune It Or Die!

    Robert Lopresti

  • THURSDAY:

    Femme Fatale

    Deborah
    Elliott-Upton

  • FRIDAY:

    Bander- snatches

    Steven Steinbock

  • SATURDAY:

    Mississippi Mud

    John M. Floyd

  • SATURDAY:

    New York Minute

    Angela Zeman

  • SUNDAY:

    The A.D.D. Detective

    Leigh Lundin

  • AD HOC:

    Mystery Masterclass

    Distinguished Guest Contributors

  • AD HOC:

    Surprise Witness

    Guest Blogger

  • Aural Argument

    "The Sack 'Em Up Men"

    "Crow's Avenue"

    "The Stain"

    "Jumpin' Jack Flash"

    "The Art of the Short Story"

    "Bouchercon 2010 Short Story Panel"

Monday, May 12: The Scribbler

SECOND RATE THE GREAT

by James Lincoln Warren

What do you call a restaurant that gets three stars out of four, the term paper that gets a B, the novel that climbs as high as Number 11 on the bestseller list? How do you describe the near miss, how do you characterize the act of creativity that is almost perfect, but not quite?

You say that it is excellent rather than superior, or that is is extremely good rather than the best. In short, you are saying that it is not quite in the front rank, but still worthy of consideration. But that which fails of the front rank must needs be considered as belonging to a following rank, a lower order. If being in the front rank is first rate, then being in the next rank means second rate.

And calling something — or someone — second rate is an insult.

This has always puzzled me. Not everybody can aspire to be first rate, to walk among the gods as an equal. Very few of us can even aspire to walk among mere heroes. Why then, do we take umbrage at being identified as second or even third rate?

In the days of sail, a warship was rated according to how many guns it mounted. A first rate had over 100 guns, a second rate 90 to 100, third and fourth rates between 64 and 80, and fifth and sixth rates from 28 to 60 guns. All of these ships were commanded by post Captains, i.e., naval officers of the rank of Captain rather than commanding officers of ships who were Captain only by courtesy. Generally speaking, the more senior the Captain, the more weight in metal he could throw (have more guns, viz., command larger ships). But the dashing heroics were usually reserved for the fifth and sixth rates, the frigates. These were the throughbreds of the sea, the ships that undertook independent cruises and gathered glory for their officers and crews. Many a Captain regretted moving up to a ponderous ship of the line in turn with the promotion cycle, for if they were now more visible to their superiors, they were certainly less independent under the hawklike scrutiny of the admirals commanding the fleet.

The point is simply that being not of the highest rank is nothing to feel insulted over. I once mentioned to a friend of mine that I never expect to win an Edgar, only to find out he was on the Short Story Committee that year. (Talk about embarrassing.) Well, I don’t. It doesn’t seem to me that the kind of story I write is the kind of stroy that wins Edgars. I don’t do surprise endings and ironic twists. The solution to the crime is rarely shockingly revelatory. But I consider them well written and entertaining, and frankly, that’s my yardstick. And that’s all right with me — winning an Edgar would be great, but I don’t write stories with the object in view of obtaining one.

I was extremely fortunate to have a story of mine included in Alfred Hitchcock’s Mystery Magazine Presents Fifty Years of Crime and Suspense, AHMM’s golden anniversary anthology.

Just look at the names on the cover: Donald E. Westlake, Charles Willeford, Evan Hunter, Lawrence Block, and so forth.

Now that’s what I call first rate. My little story is running with the big dogs. But it would be foolish to assume that because it was included in the anthology among so many luminaries that I am one of them myself.

Nothing I write is intended to change the reader’s life. Nothing I write is intended to sweep the reader off his feet with the subtle and powerful beauty of its language. Nothing I write is intended to haunt the reader or make the reader question his own ethical being. Nothing I write is meant to dramatically change the world.

If I touch a reader’s heart, that’s wonderful. If I compose a felicitous or even quotable turn of phrase, that’s a big bonus. If the reader thinks about the nature of justice even fleetingly, that’s a positive event. If something I write helps someone perceive the world in a different way, that is more than I ever expected.

I’m writing to entertain, to engage the reader for a few minutes and make him not regret using his time reading an invention of mine instead of doing something else. Nothing more. But as I see it, that’s a pretty high calling. When you take someone’s time, you are taking something that can never be given back. You have to be responsible when you do.

I’m not William Shakespeare, Miguel de Cervantes, Lev Tolstoy, or Charles Dickens. I’m not Arthur Conan Doyle, Agatha Christie, or Raymond Chandler. I’m not even in the third tier, or the fourth. I never will be. Maybe I’m somewhere along the line of sixth rate. A frigate Captain.

Being sixth rate is actually something to feel rather proud of.

Posted in The Scribbler on May 12th, 2008
RSS 2.0 Both comments and pings are currently closed.

9 comments

  1. May 12th, 2008 at 4:45 am, Terrie Moran Says:

    JLW,

    But you do run a first rate blog, and in first rate company!

    Congrats on the story in the Hitchcock anthology.

    Terrie

  2. May 12th, 2008 at 8:12 am, Leigh Says:

    Will you stop being so damned apologetic and accept the honor in good grace! Con-bloody-gratulations!

    You (sea) dog you!

  3. May 12th, 2008 at 1:11 pm, John Says:

    Sincere congratulations on the AHMM anthology. Well deserved!

  4. May 12th, 2008 at 2:35 pm, Deborah Says:

    Congratulations! You are indeed running with the big dogs!

  5. May 12th, 2008 at 9:25 pm, Jeff Baker Says:

    Hear! Hear! And congrats, James! All the members of the pack you run with are in good company! Arf!

  6. May 13th, 2008 at 2:08 am, Melodie Says:

    Jim,

    Congratulations!

    And (surprise) I don’t agree you have to be responsible for taking someone’s time. You have to be responsible to yourself, the writer. The reader can always make a decision to move on to another story in the anthology if they don”t like yours. (Which I doubt they ever would.)

  7. May 14th, 2008 at 8:23 pm, Dick Stodghill Says:

    Reminds me of having a story picked up for an anthology that included fifty stories, one for each state. Mine was set in Indiana. When I received a copy of the book I was shocked to find the other writers included Edgar Allan Poe, Jack London and many more a step or two or six above my level. I’m still trying to come up with a way to begin a conversation like this: When Edgar and Jack and I were collaborating . . .
    Any suggestions?

  8. May 18th, 2008 at 6:48 pm, Travis Erwin Says:

    Congrats! From what I’ve read you are indeed a fine writer.

    I’ve been meaning to drop by and say that the turn of phrase stimulus package was sullied by my own corrupt mind not your usage of it. Sorry if I made it sound like you were being crass when it was just my own foul mind at work.

  9. May 18th, 2008 at 11:58 pm, JLW Says:

    Like I’ve never had my own mind firmly stuck in the gutter.

    Thanks for the kind words, Travis!

« Sunday, May 11: The A.D.D. Detective Tuesday, May 13: High-Heeled Gumshoe »

The Sidebar

  • Lex Artis

      Crippen & Landru
      Futures Mystery   Anthology   Magazine
      Homeville
      The Mystery   Place
      Short Mystery   Fiction Society
      The Strand   Magazine
  • Amicae Curiae

      J.F. Benedetto
      Jan Burke
      Bill Crider
      CrimeSpace
      Dave's Fiction   Warehouse
      Emerald City
      Martin Edwards
      The Gumshoe Site
      Michael Haskins
      _holm
      Killer Hobbies
      Miss Begotten
      Murderati
      Murderous Musings
      Mysterious   Issues
      MWA
      The Rap Sheet
      Sandra Seamans
      Sweet Home   Alameda
      Women of   Mystery
      Louis Willis
  • Filed Briefs

    • Bandersnatches (226)
    • De Novo Review (10)
    • Femme Fatale (224)
    • From the Gallery (3)
    • High-Heeled Gumshoe (151)
    • Miscellany (2)
    • Mississippi Mud (192)
    • Mystery Masterclass (91)
    • New York Minute (21)
    • Spirit of the Law (18)
    • Surprise Witness (46)
    • The A.D.D. Detective (228)
    • The Scribbler (204)
    • Tune It Or Die! (224)
  • Legal Archives

    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
Criminal Brief: The Mystery Short Story Web Log Project - Copyright 2011 by the respective authors. All rights reserved.
Opinions expressed are solely those of the author expressing them, and do not reflect the positions of CriminalBrief.com.