Sunday, June 22: The A.D.D. Detective
X WHY NOT? Part IV
by Leigh Lundin
My X Why project has been a combined learning and teaching experience. Without exception, everyone has been supportive and helpful. Several women wrote in on topics that were surprising, even shocking. I’ll sort through these today.
White Women and Black Widows
Three correspondents complained about women getting away with rape and murder, literally. Two suggested that men (prosecutors and jurors) failed to see these women for the evil that they were, particularly if the woman was young, white, pretty, and "sympathetic", much like Florida child rapist, Debra Lafave or Tennessee’s Pamela Rogers Turner. One referred to Politically Incorrect‘s Bill Maher, who tends to blanket amnesty upon women that commit crimes. Men find it difficult to imagine women as capable of evil as a man, an unfair and unrealistic miscarriage they argued.
(Before moving on to murderers, you must check the ironic art found in Idea Grove’s Media Orchard.)
Killer Babes
Those who contacted me weren’t alone and murder can be a lot closer than we like to think. Beth Terrell, in her first blog for the new Murderous Musings, wrote about suspecting her stepmother got away with murder. TruTV (formerly CourtTV) and even network television bring us stories of virtually the person next door who committed murder.
Even the Good
Sometimes good people are tempted to do bad things. Midweek, I spoke with an absolutely charming woman who revealed a secret from her first marriage.
She described her first husband as Jekyll and Hyde: "He went to work in the morning as Dr. Jekyll, but returned in the evening as Mr. Hyde. He wasn’t physically abusive, but he was controlling. I guess you’d say he was verbally abusive."
She didn’t explicitly state she feared him, but nastiness is corrosive and stress eats from within. Every night, she said, she went to sleep plotting his murder, every variation she could think of. She began to research sentencing of women who had murdered their husbands.
"I told him that no woman (where they lived) was sentenced to more than ten years for killing her husband and most served less than that. I told him I could do ten years easily and still come out a young woman. I said, ‘I’d spend my time reading. They bring the book cart around, and I would load up on fresh books. It wouldn’t be bad at all.’ By the time of our divorce, he was terrified of me."
Inside Job
Most men– perhaps most people– might throw up their hands and ask how anyone can understand this. A few of us have spoken of method acting as a technique to get inside the head of the opposite sex, what one woman calls method writing.
The key to understanding is deconstruction. Take every step apart. One of the keys is understanding we have only four or five elemental emotions. Many of our ‘big’ complex emotions are based upon more primitive emotions. For example, rage has a foundation of fear. Dig into anger deep enough, and fear comes spewing out.
Imagine living with someone nasty, full of anger. Imagine the fear of them coming home, not knowing whether they’ll be loving or whether they’ll be in a rage. There’s a dead look in the eye of a person when they’re controlled by inner anger.
Stress kills the love and when that love dies, it doesn’t evaporate but it sours, it putrefies. Self-preservation kicks in, not just of the physical body, but of the mind and soul.
But am I making Bill Maher excuses for her? She didn’t kill anyone, but the argument could be made she played a game of Gaslight.
In our conversation, she seems like a lovely lady, very much in love with her second husband, and she spoke of the events of her first marriage as if it were another life. How close it might have come, though, a synapse in the mind snaps and for an instance something goes terribly wrong.
Trial attorneys want jurors to see their side in black and white. Many people see shades of grey. Some of us make out the hues.
Great Divide
Almost every woman who wrote me described one thing in common that astonished me. They mentioned that their husbands like when their wives accompanied them, usually to sporting events, but musical events too. Universally, every woman expressed a silent but growing anger about joining them.
I touched on this phenomenon in my story, "False Front", but I failed to grasp the extent and depth of resentment, which ranged from tiny acts of malice to a woman who flat out said she couldn’t wait for her husband to die rather than see one more football game.
(To clarify, this issue wasn’t mentioned by younger women or non-Caucasians. It’s not limited to North America, though, as at least one contact is from the UK. However, it makes we wonder how women who drop that hook "love sports" in their personal ads will feel 10 or 20 years hence.)
Most weren’t that extreme… yet. Two or three said while their man kept his eye on the ball, they kept their eye on players’ asses. "A baseball batter, he gets up to the plate, bends over and waggles his behind. There’s more to a game than who scores."
"Tight end?" said another. "I can tell you all about tight ends. Getting your hands on the ball has a whole ‘nother meaning." This Mickey Mantle Award site explains it all.
(One woman wrote that she takes along a book to read at baseball games, that is when she’s not watching bottoms. She was in the stadium, reading, when one of the home run records was set.)
An especially evocative woman wrote about her husband who takes part in lawnmower racing and enjoys inviting her to attend races with him.
"I keep it (my feelings) from him because he’s the most sincere, guileless person I’ve ever known and I’d rather be dead then ever hurt his feelings! so it’s hard because I go along with it all. it is nice and enjoyable, we’re all friends and we hang out in the evening with bonfires and we chill. But I found myself feeling resentful this morning. No, it’s a half assed kind of uncommitted resentment. It’s not hari kari kind of bitterness–it’s just mild aggravation. On a scale of 1 to 10 it’s about 4."
She was mild compared to the Ohio woman who wrote about football.
"Football, I live minute to minute. So does he, although he doesn’t know it. WTF is it with football? Guys standing around measuring their lengths and piling on top of each other and patting their asses like they’re homos? All of them ignoring women? I won’t go to another () game. There are days when I wish he’d die or get out of the house. I mean it, if he died, I’d sit down and switch to my channels and maybe a couple of days later I’d call the funeral home to pick him up. I’m over it."
Only two were on the 11+ scale; most, like our lawnmower racing wife were category 4. Last Wednesday, my friends Thrush, Mahmoud, Steve, and I discussed the situation of a husband who likes to take his wife country swing dancing. She felt mildly resentful about going, but kept it to herself.
None of us guys were sure what country swing dancing was; I imagined it must be something like square dancing, hearing in my ears, "Swing your partner". However, we felt convinced the husband was taking his wife dancing because he thought she enjoyed it, trying to be thoughtful of her. Where did that go wrong?
Hey, we figured given a choice, most guys would opt for lawnmower racing.
Physical Discomfort
Several readers brought up experiences unique to women. Only one mentioned PMS, and she merely said it was an ordeal for both genders.
One person complained that seating seemed to be made for men, not women. She said, "Once upon a time bucket seat cars would let a woman swivel the seat and deposit her on the sidewalk. Now we have to struggle out of them."
Personally, I have the opposite problem. Seating in some cars is less than optimal. I walked away from a DeLorean test drive because I could not fit my legs under the steering wheel.
Chair headrests usually strike me across the shoulders and rarely do I find an easy chair that is comfortable. Airlines’ new economy seating is utter misery, my knees jammed in discomfort.
I’ve also experienced a problem that most women won’t, that of bumping my head getting in and out of cars. I once nearly knocked myself out on a low door lintel.
Clothes (Don’t) Make the Woman
"We have a love-love-love-hate relationship with shoes. We love them, we love to be seen in them, but we hate to wear them."
I mentioned in a previous column that toques (ski caps) make a girl look cute but a guy look silly. Of course a guy could probably find a girl in seamen’s oilskins cute, but that’s the nature of attraction.
In a story I received today: A teacher who’d recently lost weight stepped out of the restroom into the lounge, only to have her skirt slide to the floor, leaving her standing in front of her colleagues in pantyhose and pumps. Nonchalantly, she scooped up her skirt, saying, "If I’d known this was going to happen, I’d have worn panties."
Her fellow teachers took the woman out for happy hour.
Smoking Bad
In another ladies room story, smoking had been banned except for restrooms, where everyone crowded in to smoke, joke, and tell stories.
"One day, Dottie was in the stall — telling jokes, laughing, smoking and tinkling. All of a sudden, she screamed.
"What’s wrong?" everyone demanded, hoping it wasn’t a rat crawling out of the plumbing.
"I dropped my cigarette!" she screeched. "In the crotch of my pantihose."
The next day, she reported, "My husband says if I ever come home again with a hole burned in the crotch of my pantihose, I’m in trouble!"
In the Meantime
I have a wealth of notes left that might find their way into a future article. Thank you to everyone who read, commented, wrote in, and supported the project by blogging throughout the week.
Be kind, be especially kind to the opposite sex. I leave you with an exercise.
Example 3
The following was sent in by a reader. I include it here, (a) because it’s funny and (b) because it makes a good exercise.
It’s obviously written by a woman. Why? Previous columns describe male and female voices. Study the sentences and after you laugh, ask yourself, if this was a actually male, what would he really say?
The husband had just finished reading a new book entitled, ‘You Can Be the Man of Your House.’
He stormed to his wife in the kitchen and announced, "From now on, you need to know that I am the man of this house and my word is law. You will prepare me a delicious gourmet meal tonight, and when I’m finished eating my meal, you will serve me a sumptuous dessert. After dinner, you are going to go upstairs with me and we will have the kind of sex that I want.
"Afterwards, you are going to draw me a hot bath so I can relax. You will wash my back and towel me dry and bring me my favorite robe.
"Then, you will gently massage my feet and hands. Then tomorrow, guess who’s going to dress me and comb my hair?"
The wife replied, "The funeral director would be my first guess."
Note: One of my sources for quotations above sent me a note asking me to delete “that word”, which would not materially affect her comment. Nine hours after this post went live, she contacted me that I had misunderstood which word she intended. My apologies for the error.
The key to understanding is deconstruction.
No, Leigh. “Deconstruction” is the key to obfuscation. The term is not a synonym for analysis, as I have heretofore mentioned, and it certainly doesn’t mean to “take every step apart.” Deconstruction is Derrida’s virtually incomprehensible method of “exposing unquestioned metaphysical assumptions and internal contradictions in philosophical and literary language.”
Three hundred dollar word cop fine!
I would not describe sociopaths Debra Lafave and Pamela Rogers Turner as “rapists” in the strict sense of the word, although legally I’m sure the term applies. No, they are something far worse — seducers, like the loathsome legendary Don Juan, who was justly damned. (I did not, by the way, find Idea Grove’s art “ironic” in the least, and certainly not clever — only in extremely poor taste.) Seducers succeed by virtue of exploiting the venereous weaknesses of their victims, including pubescent children, so the stupidity of certain men with regard to them is only to be expected.
I find it far more bizarre how murderess Betty Broderick escaped conviction for murder in the first degree, since her entire modus operandi indicated premeditation—but she did. In her first trial, a couple of the jurors actually held out for reducing the charge to manslaughter. Unbelievable.
But unfortunately, I don’t think there’s much meat on the bone of gender resentment for crime fiction writers. One of the biggest clichés that inexperienced crime writers fall into is the scene of the wife contemplating hubby’s murder over their morning cup of coffee. Yawn city. It’s not just old hat, it’s a nasty battered mildewed old hat. After all, in real life, the spouse (or former spouse) is always the primary suspect — you might as well make the murderer the butler.
Leigh,
A seventy-five year old woman was arrested recently for leaving five dead husbands in her wake. Bad liuck?
Two older women were just convicted for killing homeless men and somehow collecting the insurance.
Murder is equal opportunity. But justice is not, alas.
I think female serial seducers have a need to exert their power and control the same as male rapists. The difference is the level of violence. But who says there isn’t violence in some of these seductions.
How can I say this? I do think it’spossible for an older woman to bring a young man into adulthood
without harming him. But that is a completely different situation. This is where society gets confused.
Leigh, don’t try to figure out why women love shoes. Some things cannot be fixed or explained.
Women are seducers of children while men are rapists? I have yet to read that some guy is “so good-looking and hot that he shouldn’t be punished for molesting and sexually abusing children, even though he did it.”
A lot of that scenario disturbs me, but I’m really upset with the number of guilty females who are schoolteachers. Teachers should be held to the same oath as doctors: First, do no harm.
I do not accept either that the harm is done only to female children. After years and years in the public school system, I have seen numerous male children who will suffer life-long problems due to sexual abuse.
An interesting, amusing and thought-provoking commentary, Leigh. Loved the ending!
Here I go again. Re: Melodie’s response. Possibly we don’t really disagree in general, but I think we might disagree on when a school boy becomes a “young man” to be brought into adulthood by an older woman. Regardless of what we think about the age cut-offs, I will always believe it is not a role a teacher should take with his/her students.
Re: Shoes. I’m sure that everyone knows there are an awful lot of men who love women’s shoes also — some who want to wear them and some who want to remove them from women’s feet.
What I think is women should be on the jury for crimes of women. There would be no pussy-footin’ around. I agree with Fran’s first post as well. Adding another since you mentioned PMS the PPD is an issue as well. The woman who drowned her 5 precious children should’ve been held under while watching someone she loved and trusted hold her. The woman who strapped her two kids in a car and let it slide into the river should’ve been strapped in her car and face the same. What in the world? What would have happened if a man had done either?
As for the “Western” Swing Dancing (that would be Bob Wills type music–a slice of big band, country, rockabilly which started in the 30s 40s etc)—I do resent I go with him but he doesn’t go with me to Willie! However, it is a small price for me because it makes him happy. (you got that backards cuz he knows my feeling since I’m not very quiet – surprise surprise). He’s happy, I’m happy. He in turn, doesn’t say a word when I go off to see Willie and others with my buddies of kindred spirit. He knows I’ll come home. We accept this about the other.
Besides, I love to dance and that IS dancing even if it isn’t exactly the kind of music “I” like!!
Great article and food for thought.
JLW—a 24 year old having sex with a 14 year old is rape, I don’t care who you are, where you are, what gender you are. That is far beyond seducing.
That’s my story and I’m stickin’ to it. Only because if a 24 year old had “seduced” a 14 year old of mine much less have sex with them, there would be hell to pay.
Statutorily speaking, of course.
The word “rape” means “to take by force”. Its application to sexual ravishment was applied first in the 16th century, some three hundred years after the word had entered the English language. What these criminal women have done did not involve force, and that’s is what I meant by their crimes not being rape in “strict sense” although certainly rape in the legal sense.
The word “seduce”, on the other hand, originally meant to cause someone to betray an allegiance, and by extension, “to lead astray in conduct or belief; to draw away from the right or intended course of action to or into a wrong one; to tempt, entice, or beguile to do something wrong.” (OED)
Seduction of the innocent is therefore much more evil than rape—and that’s why I said it was “far worse”. Rape is performed against the victim’s will. Seduction involves corrupting the victim as well as violating the victim—it is not only a crime against the victim’s person, but against the victim’s soul. It takes someone truly evil to perform it.
There is nothing nice about seduction. It is the crime that Satan committed against Eve in the Book of Genesis, the motivatiing force that drove the first sin. As I said, it is worse and more damaging than physical attack by force.
So look before you leap, alisa, and don’t preach. When I use words, I use them precisely, for what they actually mean, and not for what I think or want them to mean.
We both agree that these women committed terrible crimes, and if it happened to your 14-year-old, I would hold you back only long enough to fetch my shotgun and come with you.
Gender should not matter — crimes against children are bad no matter who perpetrates the criminal action and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. There have been many attractive criminals — Ted Bundy comes to mind. Surely no one believes he should have been given a different verdict. A rapist is a rapist. Most of us teach our children to respect their teachers. In turn, teachers should respect their students. If these rape crimes had involved a male teacher, I bet no one would have cared if he was good looking or not when the jury came in with a verdict.
So look before you leap, alisa, and don’t preach. When I use words, I use them precisely, for what they actually mean, and not for what I think or want them to mean.
Ah, but I wasn’t preaching gentle arbitrator, I was but using words precisely as I meant them. I was under the assumption we could discuss as we wished and saw fit and definition of RAPE. But I suppose in the words of one or more evasive Presidents—the word “is” comes into question.
But thanks for the warning. Again.
Gentle, but not controlled, reader
Children!
Go to your rooms!
Leigh, you certainly get more interesting mail than I do. I don’t think I’m complaining, though.
A long time ago (the statute of limitations has long passed) I knew a woman who lost everything in a divorce. One night she showed up at her ex’s house with a bunch of female friends. Several beat him up while the rest took out everything that the woman wanted. She assumed, correctly, that he would be too embarassed to call the cops.
Boston’s infamous Combat Zone was once notorious for gangs of women mugging men.
I would never suggest a teacher seduce or rape a student no matter what age or gender.
Women are seducers of children while men are rapists?
That isn’t what I said, Fran. I said that these two specific women were seducers and then compared them to Don Juan, who the last time I looked, was supposedly an adult male. (He, of course, was so evil he was dragged off to burn in hell for his crimes while still living. ) The thirty-year-old male internet sexual predator who convinces a teenage girl to run away with him to a motel is every bit as much as a seducer as these women, and as heinous a criminal.
I didn’t mean to imply that I was quoting JLW with the opening line in that comment. It was intended to provoke thought.
Glad you brought up the 30-year-old male internet predator. I suspect that what sometimes begins as an attempted seduction turns into out-and-out violent rape once the motel room door is locked.
PS – Leigh, stop being so provocative. I need to be working rather than chatting in your comments section!