The Docket

  • MONDAY:

    The Scribbler

    James Lincoln Warren

  • MONDAY:

    Spirit of the Law

    Janice Law

  • TUESDAY:

    High-Heeled Gumshoe

    Melodie Johnson Howe

  • WEDNESDAY:

    Tune It Or Die!

    Robert Lopresti

  • THURSDAY:

    Femme Fatale

    Deborah
    Elliott-Upton

  • FRIDAY:

    Bander- snatches

    Steven Steinbock

  • SATURDAY:

    Mississippi Mud

    John M. Floyd

  • SATURDAY:

    New York Minute

    Angela Zeman

  • SUNDAY:

    The A.D.D. Detective

    Leigh Lundin

  • AD HOC:

    Mystery Masterclass

    Distinguished Guest Contributors

  • AD HOC:

    Surprise Witness

    Guest Blogger

  • Aural Argument

    "The Sack 'Em Up Men"

    "Crow's Avenue"

    "The Stain"

    "Jumpin' Jack Flash"

    "The Art of the Short Story"

    "Bouchercon 2010 Short Story Panel"

Friday, November 13: Bandersnatches

BRIEF THOUGHTS

by Steve Steinbock

This week’s Bandersnatches may come off as more random than most (and I know that’s saying a lot). I began thinking about the week’s column, not having much of anything to say, and now I find myself surrounded by ideas and not sure where to begin.

I suppose I’ll start at the point where I ended last week. When I mentioned Dick Stodghill in my final paragraph, I had no idea that we’d be losing him two days later. I never met Dick in person, but he was a friend to all of us here through his frequent comments, through his guest column on Criminal Brief, and more importantly through his stories in Hitchcock and elsewhere. Last month Doug Greene and I had lunch with Hitchcock editor Linda Landrigan and Queen editor Janet Hutchings. At one point during the lunch I mentioned Dick, and all three of my companions sat back, smiled, and sighed.

Everyone liked Dick. He will be missed.

Random Droppings

Anyone notice how the word random has worked its way into youth slang? I often hear my kids say, “That’s random,” in response to anything they find off the wall. Occasionally the usage morphs into something more derogatory. In situations where my generation would have said, “That’s stupid,” kids now will sometimes say, “That’s random.” I find this unfortunate, and wonder how it came about. My guess is that in part, the word “stupid” has – perhaps rightfully – joined the ranks of politically incorrect hate-speech, not tolerated by parents or teachers. Kids may be using “random” the same way Hammett used “gunsel” – to get their idea past the censors. But in part, and on a darker note, I wonder if children of the early 21st century see randomness as inherently bad – or stupid. This would surprise me. But if so, I think they’re missing something.

Room for Thought

There’s a place I’ve visited a number of times in my dreams. It’s a room in my grandparents’ house, a big room in the basement that I enter through a door off the side of the laundry room. There are countertops running the length of the large room, and a huge table fills the center. Every surface is covered with books, magazines, photo albums, and memorabilia.

To the best of my knowledge, the room never existed. But for thirty or forty years, I’ve found myself there in my dreams, sorting through the papers, finding a random article or photograph. Jungians may have a heyday unwrapping this image. Maybe it means I have some unfulfilled need or aspiration. But to me it’s just a nice place that my dreams take me to now and then.

In a real sense, my office has become that place. My office, the attic level on our house is my territory – eight-hundred square feet filled with bookshelves, desks, boxes, and stacks of books and papers. In stark contrast to the rest of our orderly house, there are times when it’s difficult to find a footpath from one end of the attic to the other. At times the clutter overwhelming – even for me – and it becomes impossible to work there. But at other times, like the room in my dreams, it’s a refuge and repository of comfort and random ideas.

So Many Books

I’m always surrounded by books. But this week in particular I have more than usual. Plus, I’ve just ordered two of Dick Stodghill’s collections. Yesterday I finished the novel I was reading, and in trying to decide what to read next, books started flying at me like playing cards at the end of a Lewis Carroll novel. I ended up with a stack of some twenty books. Other than one memoir (by Paul Auster) and collection of essays (by P.D. James), all the books I’d chosen are more or less part of The Genre. Some are more recent than others. A few are review copies that have yet to be published.

Four of the books – a disproportionate number – are what I suppose you might call, for lack of a better term, meta-detective stories. They are either metaphysical detective stories, or meta-fictional novels with detectives. All four of these floated to the top of my stack. They include Noir by Robert Coover (to be published by Overlook next April), an adventure of Philip M. Noir, told in the second-person; Richard Doetsch’s The 13th Hour, a novel told backwards, from chapter 12 through chapter 1, as the hero jumps back in time an hour at a jump in order to solve a murder for which he stands accused; and Jedidiah Berry’s The Manual for Detection, a Borges-esque tale of a reluctant private eye searching for meaning and for his boss in a rainy city.

The fourth is Paul Auster’s City of Glass, and that’s the one I decided to read. I would tell you about it, but I’d rather finish this column so I can read some more. Meanwhile, let me hear your random thoughts.

Come back next week and together we’ll jump down the rabbit hole or leap through a looking glass, take a stroll through an Argentine labyrinth, or dive into the depths with Poe and Melville.

Posted in Bandersnatches on November 13th, 2009
RSS 2.0 Both comments and pings are currently closed.

11 comments

  1. November 13th, 2009 at 2:36 pm, Rob Lopresti Says:

    Steven-

    I’m pretty sure that room you describe is on the top floor of Criminal Brief HQ. Ask Velma, she’d know.

    Nice words about Dick.

  2. November 13th, 2009 at 2:59 pm, Rob Lopresti Says:

    Forgot to mention… my wee bairny is 26 now but she is the first person I heard use “that’s random.” She usually meant either “that’s a non sequiteur, it doesn’t follow logically” or “that’s weird and unexpected.”

    But who knows what the younger (than her) generation is up to?

  3. November 13th, 2009 at 4:40 pm, mike tooney Says:

    Steve — Unfortunately, there are countless occasions in which one can properly use “stupid.” The problem with the word lies in its inappropriate overuse, thereby resulting in a lessening of its impact. That “stupid” may fall to political correctness, despite its universal applicability, is regrettable.

  4. November 13th, 2009 at 6:19 pm, JLW Says:

    I first heard “random” being used in its slang application by a 21-year-old German girl who learn it in Australia, indicating that it has global reach. I generally like slang, but it does bug me when it hijacks otherwise perfectly harmless words and pollutes their meanings.

    On the one hand, such abuse spreads much more rapidly than it used to—I’m sure that the sense of “random” as “idiotic” originated here in the U.S.—but on the other hand, cutting edge slang has a much shorter lifetime than it did formerly. (I referenced this article in The Scribbler this past August which is on point here.) This is because it becomes dated much more quickly, and moves into the mainstream where it loses its cachet and so dies.

    Remember “heinous” and “bogus”? Both gone with Bill & Ted. Unfortunately, “awesome” yet survives.

    I doubt very much that any avoidance of “stupid” (if “stupid” is being avoided—I am far from convinced) has anything whatsoever to do with political correctness—slang is not by its nature PC, since it is used primarily as a means to identify members of a specific group, in this case, a member of the youth culture. Slang synonyms are not adopted because the “mainstream” terms are deemed objectionable, but rather because they are seen as too bland.

  5. November 14th, 2009 at 2:31 am, Jeff Baker Says:

    Remember the books about Mr. Bass? (“Wonderful Flight To The Mushroom Planet” ect. I think the author’s name was Cameron.) Mr. Bass’ multi-volume personal notebooks were called “Random Jottings.” Ahhh, the places we go in our dreams, I’ve seen a place that’s part school library, part bowling alley part the entrance to my high school in my dreams for years. It’s my theory that we dream about things we think about during the day and we—OH NO! Here come the pile of books! And the bowling ball!
    Gotta run!!!

  6. November 14th, 2009 at 3:22 am, JLW Says:

    The author was Eleanor Cameron — The Wonderful Flight to the Mushroom Planet and its sequels. And it was Tycho Bass, a play on the name of Tycho Brahe, the famous 16th century astronomer, on whose observations Kepler based his laws of planetary motion. “Tycho” means “luck” — the Greek goddess of luck was named “Tyche”.

    I remember those books very clearly.

  7. November 14th, 2009 at 3:41 am, JLW Says:

    I just remembered another witty reference to Cameron’s books — in “2001: A Space Odyssey”, scientist Heywood Floyd is flown to the site of the mysterious monolith (“TMA-1”: “Tycho Magnetic Anomaly 1”) from “Tycho Base” (get it?), Tycho being the name of the most prominent crater on the Moon and the site of a lunar colony in the story.

    Arthur Clarke, who aside from being one of the all time great science fiction authors, was trained as an astronomer and was the man who invented the concept of the communications satellite, must have known of Cameron’s stories. As I recall, they were long on the technical aspects of theoretical space flight, a fact especially interesting because the “Mushroom” books were mostly written before the launch of Sputnik.

  8. November 14th, 2009 at 4:19 am, Jeff Baker Says:

    Thanks! And i didn’t catch that about 2001.
    Guess I’ll have to watch the movie again!(or think myself into it!)

  9. November 14th, 2009 at 10:21 am, Leigh Says:

    Kids seem less worried about political correctness than the rest of us. For example, “That’s so gay,” seems to have nothing much to do with either gay or intended offense.

    Steve, that’s the best article yet about Dick.

  10. November 15th, 2009 at 2:32 am, Steve Steinbock Says:

    Thanks all. Wow, I remember the Eleanor Cameron novels quite well. I still think of it whenever I smell sulfur.

    (Anyone who hasn’t read Wonderful Flight to the Mushroom Planet should run right out to the bookstore – if it’s still in print).

    Jeff, watch out, here comes another bowling ball.

  11. November 15th, 2009 at 4:41 pm, Steve's Wench Says:

    You do realize babe that the reason I don’t overhaul your “office” is because I like you better as a dreamer;) The clutter should go though so you work where you are suppose to :p

« Thursday, November 12: Femme Fatale Saturday, November 14: Mississippi Mud »

The Sidebar

  • Lex Artis

      Crippen & Landru
      Futures Mystery   Anthology   Magazine
      Homeville
      The Mystery   Place
      Short Mystery   Fiction Society
      The Strand   Magazine
  • Amicae Curiae

      J.F. Benedetto
      Jan Burke
      Bill Crider
      CrimeSpace
      Dave's Fiction   Warehouse
      Emerald City
      Martin Edwards
      The Gumshoe Site
      Michael Haskins
      _holm
      Killer Hobbies
      Miss Begotten
      Murderati
      Murderous Musings
      Mysterious   Issues
      MWA
      The Rap Sheet
      Sandra Seamans
      Sweet Home   Alameda
      Women of   Mystery
      Louis Willis
  • Filed Briefs

    • Bandersnatches (226)
    • De Novo Review (10)
    • Femme Fatale (224)
    • From the Gallery (3)
    • High-Heeled Gumshoe (151)
    • Miscellany (2)
    • Mississippi Mud (192)
    • Mystery Masterclass (91)
    • New York Minute (21)
    • Spirit of the Law (18)
    • Surprise Witness (46)
    • The A.D.D. Detective (228)
    • The Scribbler (204)
    • Tune It Or Die! (224)
  • Legal Archives

    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
Criminal Brief: The Mystery Short Story Web Log Project - Copyright 2011 by the respective authors. All rights reserved.
Opinions expressed are solely those of the author expressing them, and do not reflect the positions of CriminalBrief.com.