Tuesday, December 1: New York Minute
—JLW
TO DIE OR NOT TO DIE
by Angela Zeman
December’s Vanity Fair magazine selected cougar-bait Robert Pattinson for its cover. Happy Holidays. If anyone needs a reminder (I would have, a month ago) he’s the smouldering vampire heartthrob for eleven year old girl-fans in the smash hit movie franchise, “Twilight.” It might deserve the attention it’s getting, I have no opinion, never having seen it. Teen yearning/angst-filled entertainments don’t normally interest me. But Otto Penzler made me pay attention.
The Thursday before Halloween, I attended a gathering at Mysterious Bookshop to help celebrate its 4 year anniversary at the new Tribeca location. That same day, Otto, the bookshop’s owner and noted publisher/editor/bookman, had been rave reviewed (plus photo) in the NY Times Art Section for his collection of stories about Vampires. A doorstop-sized softcover book, it features vampire stories old and new, including (assistant Daniel told me) a vampire story written by D. H. Lawrence. Who knew Lawrence had written such a story, said my enthusiastic informant.
Right, good for D. H., but I walked away with a question broader than D. H.’s unexpected participation: why MORE vampires at all? We’re already surrounded with so many. Shouldn’t vampires be over about now?
Remember Buffy? (Another teen show I never watched.) She began saving the world in 1997. Buffy The Vampire Slayer, who with stern high school spirit, slayed (slew?) vampires and other supernatural bad guys on a cable TV channel until 2003. She spawned an industry of tie-in games and products which still sell.
In 2001 Charlaine Harris’s first (and hysterically funny, in my opinion) vampire softcover novel appeared and caught Alan Ball’s attention. (Cable TV series Six Feet Under; the film “American Beauty.”) The resulting TV series, True Blood, premiered in 2008, featuring a 25 year old cocktail waitress Sookie Stackhouse, whose campy sexual adventures in Bon Temps, Louisiana, are at least safely outside the boundaries of statutory rape. One critic assures viewers that the acting won’t make you vomit. Good to know! This show I did watch. To the best of my knowledge, new seasons are still being shot.
In 2003, on the heels of Buffy’s last adventure, Stephanie Meyers’ first Young Adult vampire novel (aka the aforementioned “Twilight” series, starring Pattinson, et al) came into print and spiraled with vampire super-speed into a multi-venue industry that retroactively boosted Buffy’s cult popularity. Then this year, 2009, The Vampire Diaries burst out of its coffin. Another YA success, which, in fact, angers Twilight fans as being written in far too exact imitation of the successful Twilight storyline.
“Twilight” and True Blood are both hot picks for MTV’s People’s Choice Awards, given every January to the most popular television, movies, and music.
Just reporting, not criticizing. Don’t forget Dickens was considered “pop culture,” in his time.
Vampires have entertained us sporadically over the centuries. Remember Count Chocula, the sugar-bomb cereal, and Sesame Street’s Count Von Count, who taught toddlers their numbers? In 1897, Bram Stoker wrote Dracula. Dracula was never represented as “the” original vampire, but became a classic much-filmed story. Historians speculate that Stoker might have been inspired by a pre-Christian holiday during which dead spirits arise at night from their graves to roam among the living—aka Halloween, in this country. Ann Rice began creating her vampire empire (the Vampire Chronicles) in the seventies, thankfully without consideration of the disposable income of adolescents.
Still, seems creepy to me: the appearance and thriving of so many vampire entertainments in the last decade. Freud would have obvious opinions regarding the incessant feverish sex, blood-fests, alive only in the dark, vampire tales … But what would he say about the ubiquitousness of it these days?
Clearly Stoker and Rice had followed artistic inclinations, not a publishing trend, and in fact had merely produced first class stories. (Merely!)
Trends, on the other hand, burst into existance with usually one blockbuster-level success that generates dizzying profit. Publishers and producers rush to replicate anything that earns so much money, resulting in a market glut. Then as audiences tire of the often less interesting copycats, they stop buying. When profits drop, publishers and producers drop the product. Until … enter the next huge success. John Grisham’s legal thrillers make an easy example. And Bond. James Bond. My guess is publishers are still enjoying the upcurve created by Dan Brown’s religious exposure/revelation puzzle thriller. I give that five more years, since even Brown’s finding it difficult to reproduce such a narrow sub-category.
So, commercially speaking, I thought vampires should be dying out by now. But no. Otto Penzler’s vampire anthology is a huge success. And fresh crops of vampire novels continue to appear in chain-bookstores. Chains are not known for taking commercial risks.
Donald Maass, literary agent, was present in the Mysterious Bookshop that night. He’s known for analyzing blockbusters and explaining their whys and hows, so I turned to him. I asked if the current vampire fever could possibly (wild guess) spring from the terrorism and violence 9/11 slammed onto our doorstep—as opposed to wars that happen to “others” at a comfortable distance. And he said absolutely. “The supernatural endows special powers—” Well, certainly, I’d long been familiar with the many disguises of the desire for power. I myself love superheroes.
But he continued. This is the part I hadn’t suspected: “—and immortality.”
Immortality.
Aha. Sucks to be mortal.
Angela, I always love your columns.
I haven’t yet read the Stephanie Meyer novels, but I’m crazy about Sookie Stackhouse, and superheroes, and many things paranormal. Mortality does indeed suck.
By the way, Woody Allen wrote a hilarious short story (“Count Dracula,” I think) that featured a vampire roaming around during a solar eclipse, and the great Jack Ritchie also did some vampire shorts.
Long live Bela Lugosi.
Sexuality has a lot to do with it. In these sticky days of political correctness, vampires allow viewers to bare throats to desires, men and women, each to their own rôle.
One of my earliest stories was a vampire short, the only one I wrote. Hmm… Thanks, Angela, now might be the time to get it out the door!
I started reading the first Twilight novel and never finished it. It’s just not my cup of tea. And the movie, when I saw it on DVD, was so-so. In fact, I remember thinking, “Nothing to write home about.” Still, I can understand why many teens and young adults–mostly girls–go crazy about the series.
Anything that arouses (pun intended) so much interest and discussion and, yes, PASSION gets my respect and admiration.
And we love to be scared. Nobody did that better than Stephen King in Salem’s Lot. I remember reading an article where an editor swore he’d say No! loud and clear to any novel about vampires — they were so passe, but when he read Salem’s Lot, he changed his mind. “I didn’t mean one like this. This is fabulous!”
I’m a big admirer of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, but not for its vampire theme, which I found generally tedious. The original “Buffy” was a feature film (1992), a good-natured if uneven parody of vampire movies, which I thoroughly enjoyed. When writer Joss Whedon turned it in to a TV franchise, I was frankly suspicious—and Buffy was at its best when it didn’t take itself all that seriously. What made the show stand out wasn’t so much its supernatural elements as its playful approach to language. There’s even a book on the subject by a professor of linguistics, Slayer Slang: A Buffy the Vampire Slayer Lexicon, which I highly recommend to anybody interested in slang, how it works, and how it evolves.
I think the original concept behind the current “sexy vampire” trend was “vampire as seducer”. Outwardly, the seducer is attractive, but inwardly he is morally corrupt. The idea of a vampire fits this mold. Dracula appeared to be suave, wealthy, and sophisticated, but he was in reality a monster whose only true interest was in exploiting women, metaphorically represented by exsanguination resulting in the theft of souls, the worst imaginable sin.
In the last thirty or so years, there has been a conflation of these two roles, so that the sex appeal is no longer a device to conceal the monstrosity, but part and parcel with it. I think the first time this was consciously done was the Frank Langella interpretation in the 1979 film version, but it got further boosts from both Anne Rice and Joss Whedon in the ensuing decades. This is not a trend I admire. I like my vampires to be ancient horrors, not metrosexual youths.
Ernie Kovacs called the copying of a succesful theme the “beat it to death syndrome.” And I remember the 1960’s soap opera “Dark Shadows” and the Shakespearean vampire Barnabas Collins. Haven’t read the “Twilight” books (or Harris, which might be my loss) but I did read this column, Angela! Thanks for the thoughts and the laughs!
Ph wasn’t in Buffy, was she?
Just kidding. 🙂
I loved to be scared, but more of the sneak up kind of scared that could really happen. Twilight is sort of a teenage soap. I never watched Dark Shadows but it was very popular.
I like scary real life people.