The Docket

  • MONDAY:

    The Scribbler

    James Lincoln Warren

  • MONDAY:

    Spirit of the Law

    Janice Law

  • TUESDAY:

    High-Heeled Gumshoe

    Melodie Johnson Howe

  • WEDNESDAY:

    Tune It Or Die!

    Robert Lopresti

  • THURSDAY:

    Femme Fatale

    Deborah
    Elliott-Upton

  • FRIDAY:

    Bander- snatches

    Steven Steinbock

  • SATURDAY:

    Mississippi Mud

    John M. Floyd

  • SATURDAY:

    New York Minute

    Angela Zeman

  • SUNDAY:

    The A.D.D. Detective

    Leigh Lundin

  • AD HOC:

    Mystery Masterclass

    Distinguished Guest Contributors

  • AD HOC:

    Surprise Witness

    Guest Blogger

  • Aural Argument

    "The Sack 'Em Up Men"

    "Crow's Avenue"

    "The Stain"

    "Jumpin' Jack Flash"

    "The Art of the Short Story"

    "Bouchercon 2010 Short Story Panel"

Friday, September 24: Bandersnatches

STORY-DRIVEN

by Steven Steinbock

At the risk of repeating myself, I’m going to weigh in on the plot-driven versus character-driven debate. My conclusion, the debate itself is drivel-driven. Plot and character are two elements that fit into a balanced system that we call fiction. Comparing it to the Yin and Yang of Taoism isn’t woo-woo hokum. It’s a practical reality.

I find that when people claim that they write character-driven fiction, they’re showing off a pretension that says they’re somehow above genre writing, that their books might get shelved with mystery and suspense, but it’s really better than all that. Drivel. On the other hand, I don’t hear many people claiming to write plot-driven fiction. There are those (and I’m among them) who extol the virtues of plot, mainly because no one else does.

In a moment I’ll share with you a personal anecdote – something that recently occurred during the course of my own writing – that illustrates the interrelationship of plot and character.

I can’t pretend to understand the complexities of this thing we call story. I have read and listened to a variety of theorists who claim to have the formula. Some of them offer ideas and strategies that make sense, and may actually help writers to write better fiction. But most of the theories and systems have a reek of snake oil. It makes me wonder, if these gurus know so much, why aren’t their novels and screenplays on any blockbuster lists?

But I do think – and I apologies if this starts to sound spiritual – that Story is something that, once created, exists as a very real entity that hovers in the space between the writer, the reader, and the printed page.

In writing my current fiction project (a novel), I recently had an experience that reminded me how plot drives character, which drives plot, which drives character, ad infinitum. I was stuck at an action point in the book. In order for the plot to move forward, I had to get my lead character to go alone into a house at night, a house that had just had the crime scene tape removed a few hours earlier. I was caught in a plausibility trap. In order to keep from sounding like something from a Mary Roberts Rinehart or Carolyn Wells (with all respects to Mmes. Rinehart and Wells), I had to come up with a good reason for him to go in.

The reason, of course, was that the owner of the empty house asked my lead character to go in. Why? Because from the neighbor’s house, where she and her daughter were staying ever since a murder occurred there, her daughter saw lights coming from the house.

I’d already established that the owner of the house (whose ex-husband was found dead in her darkroom) is something of an artsy and spiritual type, while her teenage daughter is the straightforward, and in some ways, the more responsible one. But I had to ask myself, if the daughter had seen lights in the empty house, why the hell wouldn’t they call the police rather than calling my lead character? The obvious reason is that if she called the police rather than my lead character, I wouldn’t have much of a story. But I had to discover the reason within the story. There had to be a real, practical, and plausible reason why the woman wouldn’t want to call the police.

When I was at the point of giving it up for the day I had a eureka moment. What if . . . the neighbor, seeing that her friend was unable to relax after the discovery of a body in her darkroom, suggests a little marijuana. So the two middle-aged women smoke a joint. When the teenage daughter reports that she saw lights in their house next door, the two women are feeling a little too high (read “paranoid”) to call the police. They call my lead character instead. Now I had a broad, three dimensional tableau of characteristics, attitudes, interactions, and responses to play with. We get to see the teenage daughter annoyed at her mother’s irresponsible behavior. We get to see another dimension (in literally an altered state of consciousness) of the mother. We get to see my lead character’s surprise at the whole scenario. Most importantly: the plot problem was solved AND we see the characters in an amusing and very believable situation.

One final note: Out of curiosity, I checked online to see if anyone else out there is using the expression story-driven. Yes, it turns out. But only among video-game developers. Go figure.

Posted in Bandersnatches on September 24th, 2010
RSS 2.0 Both comments and pings are currently closed.

6 comments

  1. September 24th, 2010 at 2:54 am, JLW Says:

    I loved this look under the hood. (I want to read your novel when you think it’s in good enough shape for sharing, Steve).

    It should come as no surprise that I am in complete accord with your sentiments regarding the idiot dichotomy between plot v. character, as I have raved about here.

    People who indulge in this false distinction are intellectually lazy and do so to impart an appearance of sophistication. It reminds me of the hip unshaven lunch-mates I hear loudly discussing their brilliant screenplays in L.A. bistros when all I want is to munch on my sandwich in peace. Oh, grow up and buy a razor.

  2. September 24th, 2010 at 10:07 am, Rob Says:

    “Drivel-driven” made me very happy. Good piece.

    Loved the illustration, too. And “Grow up and by a razor.” Was it Esquire, many years ago, that featured on the cover a chimpanzee, sitting poolside, talking about the screenplay he was working on?

  3. September 24th, 2010 at 10:26 am, John Floyd Says:

    Great column. EVERY good story has a balance of plot and character, period. Story-driven indeed.

  4. September 24th, 2010 at 10:58 am, Leigh Says:

    What develops in the darkroom? Hmm…

    Steve, this true account wouldn’t work in fiction:
    Near me was a troublesome rental house that was supposed to be empty but showed flickers of light at night. The next morning, a deputy arrived to check it out. She refused to enter and insisted the neighbors go in while she stood by. So there I was, first through the door…

    Her strong sense of self-preservation suggested she watched more of those Halloween on Elm Street movies than I did.

  5. September 24th, 2010 at 3:44 pm, Steve Steinbock Says:

    Thanks for the comments, everyone.

    Leigh, that’s a great story. If you included that episode in a piece of fiction, most readers would say “That’s too implausible.” Funny how real-life seldom makes as much sense as fiction does.

  6. September 24th, 2010 at 8:21 pm, JLW Says:

    Funny how real-life seldom makes as much sense as fiction does.

    Fiction has more rules.

« Thursday, September 23: Femme Fatale Saturday, September 25: Mississippi Mud »

The Sidebar

  • Lex Artis

      Crippen & Landru
      Futures Mystery   Anthology   Magazine
      Homeville
      The Mystery   Place
      Short Mystery   Fiction Society
      The Strand   Magazine
  • Amicae Curiae

      J.F. Benedetto
      Jan Burke
      Bill Crider
      CrimeSpace
      Dave's Fiction   Warehouse
      Emerald City
      Martin Edwards
      The Gumshoe Site
      Michael Haskins
      _holm
      Killer Hobbies
      Miss Begotten
      Murderati
      Murderous Musings
      Mysterious   Issues
      MWA
      The Rap Sheet
      Sandra Seamans
      Sweet Home   Alameda
      Women of   Mystery
      Louis Willis
  • Filed Briefs

    • Bandersnatches (226)
    • De Novo Review (10)
    • Femme Fatale (224)
    • From the Gallery (3)
    • High-Heeled Gumshoe (151)
    • Miscellany (2)
    • Mississippi Mud (192)
    • Mystery Masterclass (91)
    • New York Minute (21)
    • Spirit of the Law (18)
    • Surprise Witness (46)
    • The A.D.D. Detective (228)
    • The Scribbler (204)
    • Tune It Or Die! (224)
  • Legal Archives

    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
Criminal Brief: The Mystery Short Story Web Log Project - Copyright 2011 by the respective authors. All rights reserved.
Opinions expressed are solely those of the author expressing them, and do not reflect the positions of CriminalBrief.com.