The Docket

  • MONDAY:

    The Scribbler

    James Lincoln Warren

  • MONDAY:

    Spirit of the Law

    Janice Law

  • TUESDAY:

    High-Heeled Gumshoe

    Melodie Johnson Howe

  • WEDNESDAY:

    Tune It Or Die!

    Robert Lopresti

  • THURSDAY:

    Femme Fatale

    Deborah
    Elliott-Upton

  • FRIDAY:

    Bander- snatches

    Steven Steinbock

  • SATURDAY:

    Mississippi Mud

    John M. Floyd

  • SATURDAY:

    New York Minute

    Angela Zeman

  • SUNDAY:

    The A.D.D. Detective

    Leigh Lundin

  • AD HOC:

    Mystery Masterclass

    Distinguished Guest Contributors

  • AD HOC:

    Surprise Witness

    Guest Blogger

  • Aural Argument

    "The Sack 'Em Up Men"

    "Crow's Avenue"

    "The Stain"

    "Jumpin' Jack Flash"

    "The Art of the Short Story"

    "Bouchercon 2010 Short Story Panel"

Saturday, February 5: Mississippi Mud

DUMB & DUMBER

by John M. Floyd

I’ve heard that three of the many things you should try to do as a fiction writer are (1) create interesting, believable characters; (2) inject humor whenever possible; and (3) write what you know. The hidden message here is that (2) and (3) can sometimes add up to (1). When you make the reader laugh a bit at your characters, and when you write about feelings and events you’re already familiar with, you automatically make the people in your story more real and believable, and more interesting as well.

Humor is always a plus. Our favorite fictional characters are often those who screw up occasionally, and especially those who aren’t afraid to poke a little fun at themselves. Imperfect characters are more believable because we can identify with them—all of us are klutzes from time to time. As for self-deprecation, I’d be willing to bet that some of the people you like the most in real life are probably those who can easily laugh at themselves. The same is true of characters you read about.

As for “writing what you know,” I feel especially qualified to write about folks who goof up now and then. Consider this regrettable but true episode from my own past:

My college roommate and I (did I mention Dumb & Dumber?) often double-dated because I was poor and car-less. On one occasion I had somehow secured a first date with a particularly stunning coed, and the four of us—my roomie and I and our dates—had gone to see a movie (Bonnie and Clyde) in downtown Starkville, Mississippi. The girls were waiting nearby while he and I stood in the incredibly long line to buy tickets to the feature. (Two of the things I remember most about that occasion are my secret desire to impress my date that night and my roommate’s grudging comment that she was one of the best-looking women he’d ever seen in his life, including his own girlfriend.)

After about twenty minutes he and I finally made it to the front of the line, bought our tickets, and rejoined the girls just outside the theatre door. That was when my date looked down at my hand and said, “Which one of us is going in?”

I stared at her, wondering what she meant, until I looked down too. In my hand was one ticket. Not two tickets. One. I’d been going to the movies alone or with one of my buddies at least a couple of times a week, so I was accustomed to buying only one ticket, and since my mind had been focused on other matters that’s what I’d done this time too.

All these years later, I still can’t think of anything intelligent I could’ve said at that point. What I did was say nothing at all. I just gave her her ticket and turned and trudged back over to stand in line again. My loyal roommate of course called out, “We’ll save you a seat,” and the three of them happily entered the theatre. I think I finally made it inside at about the same time that B & C were rudely ambushed and machine-gunned at the end of the movie. (Okay, not really—but I was pretty darn late. At least I didn’t have to spring for popcorn and Cokes.)

I can’t even describe how stupid I felt that night (and I deserved it, for being careless as well as car-less). But I also feel that I can describe it when a similar situation happens to one of my characters. This was one of those terrible and unforgettable events in life that I think probably made me a better writer, so some good came out of it. On the other hand, I never saw my date again after that night—even from a distance.

I can think of a lot of examples of klutzy behavior in fiction: Stephanie Plum managing to wreck or blow up every car she owns; John Dunbar bashing his forehead on the doorframe as he rushes out to see who’s dancing with wolves; big-city cop John Book trying to milk an Amish cow; Vincent Vega accidentally shooting a guy in the back seat of their car; the lawyer in Body Heat making a suggestive remark as he approaches a lady he thought was someone else; Derek Flint squawking and honking instructions to his pet dolphins; Ben Braddock trying to explain his absence of luggage to the hotel desk clerk when he books a room for him and Mrs. Robinson; Butch Cassidy forgetting his newly-learned Spanish words during a Bolivian bank robbery.

In all the cases mentioned above, we can relate to the people who did these foolish and/or clumsy things, and we somehow like them more because of it. (Even if they’re hired killers.) Their mistakes and discomfort and goofiness make them more familiar, more human. And just as we in real life prefer to hang around with—and do business with—people we like, we as readers will also hang in there with a story about people we like. We want our fictional protagonists to succeed and be happy, and when they do and are, we’re happy too.

So if the hero of a story you’re reading proves he’s an idiot by buying a movie ticket for himself and forgetting to buy one for his date, I hope you’ll not only chuckle and feel sorry for him and picture yourself in his shoes. I hope you’ll also wish him well . . .

Posted in Mississippi Mud on February 5th, 2011
RSS 2.0 Both comments and pings are currently closed.

8 comments

  1. February 5th, 2011 at 8:07 am, Leigh Says:

    I personally have enough laugh-at-myself incidents to populate stories forever.

    As for bad dates, this has to be one of the worst.
    (credit: Jay Leno, Tonight Show)

  2. February 5th, 2011 at 8:37 am, John Floyd Says:

    Leigh, you’re right, the Leno date story was way more embarrassing than mine. Then again, EVERYTHING’s worse in cold weather.

  3. February 5th, 2011 at 9:14 am, Anita Page Says:

    After reading your post, I want to go back and read all Donald Westlake’s Dortmunder books. Wasn’t Westlake the absolute master of that kind of humor?

  4. February 5th, 2011 at 9:42 am, John Floyd Says:

    Westlake was indeed a master of humor in fiction. Even many of his non-Dortmunders were a lot of fun to read.

    Another author who builds a lot of humor into his crime novels is Nelson DeMille. I’m a huge fan of his, and I’m pleased that he’s finally receiving the wide recognition that he’s deserved for many years.

  5. February 5th, 2011 at 9:57 am, Leigh Says:

    John Lutz’s Nudger is wryfully screw-up, not because he’s bumbling, but because of his rocky self-esteem. Even worse is his friend Danny who runs a doughnut shop where the coffee is sludge and the pastries are heavy and clunky.

    A mistress of screw-up humour is Lindsey Davis’ 1st century Roman detective Falco with similar self-esteem problems. In one novel, he takes a job with a plumber and reports the same ripoff problems we have today.

    A common between them is that neither can believe they won the beautiful girl of their dreams.

  6. February 5th, 2011 at 1:42 pm, alisa Says:

    Humour is always good. I will admit I was the only one in the theatre during Pulp Fiction who laughed out loud when the starring hit men shot Marvin’s head off in the backseat….it was like they were arguing like two commutes on the way to work and one spilled coffee on a new car…..their job was just different.

    I’m just a bear. Bear with me. :-)

  7. February 5th, 2011 at 3:31 pm, John Floyd Says:

    alisa, I doubt Marvin’s passing was any great loss. And you’re right, that scene used humor to define the way those two guys looked at their way of life. (Besides, without that misfire, Harvey Keitel wouldn’t have been in the story.) There are many who disagree, but I thought PF was a great movie.

    As for John Lutz, he’s another master of the craft.

  8. February 5th, 2011 at 3:51 pm, alisa Says:

    I’m a big fan of Tarantino and Rodriquez (also) even though they step over a few lines….:-)

« Friday, February 4: Bandersnatches Sunday, February 6: The A.D.D. Detective »

The Sidebar

  • Lex Artis

      Crippen & Landru
      Futures Mystery   Anthology   Magazine
      Homeville
      The Mystery   Place
      Short Mystery   Fiction Society
      The Strand   Magazine
  • Amicae Curiae

      J.F. Benedetto
      Jan Burke
      Bill Crider
      CrimeSpace
      Dave's Fiction   Warehouse
      Emerald City
      Martin Edwards
      The Gumshoe Site
      Michael Haskins
      _holm
      Killer Hobbies
      Miss Begotten
      Murderati
      Murderous Musings
      Mysterious   Issues
      MWA
      The Rap Sheet
      Sandra Seamans
      Sweet Home   Alameda
      Women of   Mystery
      Louis Willis
  • Filed Briefs

    • Bandersnatches (226)
    • De Novo Review (10)
    • Femme Fatale (224)
    • From the Gallery (3)
    • High-Heeled Gumshoe (151)
    • Miscellany (2)
    • Mississippi Mud (192)
    • Mystery Masterclass (91)
    • New York Minute (21)
    • Spirit of the Law (18)
    • Surprise Witness (46)
    • The A.D.D. Detective (228)
    • The Scribbler (204)
    • Tune It Or Die! (224)
  • Legal Archives

    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
Criminal Brief: The Mystery Short Story Web Log Project - Copyright 2011 by the respective authors. All rights reserved.
Opinions expressed are solely those of the author expressing them, and do not reflect the positions of CriminalBrief.com.