The Docket

  • MONDAY:

    The Scribbler

    James Lincoln Warren

  • MONDAY:

    Spirit of the Law

    Janice Law

  • TUESDAY:

    High-Heeled Gumshoe

    Melodie Johnson Howe

  • WEDNESDAY:

    Tune It Or Die!

    Robert Lopresti

  • THURSDAY:

    Femme Fatale

    Deborah
    Elliott-Upton

  • FRIDAY:

    Bander- snatches

    Steven Steinbock

  • SATURDAY:

    Mississippi Mud

    John M. Floyd

  • SATURDAY:

    New York Minute

    Angela Zeman

  • SUNDAY:

    The A.D.D. Detective

    Leigh Lundin

  • AD HOC:

    Mystery Masterclass

    Distinguished Guest Contributors

  • AD HOC:

    Surprise Witness

    Guest Blogger

  • Aural Argument

    "The Sack 'Em Up Men"

    "Crow's Avenue"

    "The Stain"

    "Jumpin' Jack Flash"

    "The Art of the Short Story"

    "Bouchercon 2010 Short Story Panel"

Monday, September 21: The Scribbler

MAKING SPORT

by James Lincoln Warren

September is one of my favorite months, mainly because I like team sports. Now, I’m not one of those sports junkies who knows every player on every team and has an encyclopedia of arcane statistics at my instant command. I couldn’t tell you what any pitcher’s ERA is and I frankly don’t even understand quarterback ratings. Notwithstanding, September is the most fun time of the year for watching sprinting gazelles plucking flying pigskins out of the air and sluggers swatting fastballs over the fence.

nfl

Football season has just begun, bringing with it the shining hope that your team will prevail in the challenging contests ahead and bring glory upon the old alma mater or your community, whether native or adopted. (Margaret is a monster Pittsburgh Steelers fan. I don’t think she’s ever been anywhere near Pittsburgh. Her other two favorite teams are UCLA, although in true Bruin spirit she does not spare them the most bitter of criticisms, and, of course, whoever is playing USC.) On the other end of the seasonal spectrum, as teams strive to make it into post-season play, baseball is at its most dramatic, the players abandoning all caution as they dive for grounders in the dirt, not even setting their stances before precipitately hurling the ball to second base with the power of a crossbow, risking all in hope of being fast enough to turn a double play.

Such heroics have deep consequences. Which is to say, watching a lot of TV. A whole lot.

If I am not a true sports junkie, I am even less a TV junkie. TV is insidious. Plugs for entertainment presented as news and news presented as entertainment. Babbling bimbos with less command of English than European schoolgirls, posing as journalists. Lying advertisers. Puerile “humor” at its most nasty and crude. Stupid contests with venal participants inexplicably held out as “reality” shows. Dramas about shallow narcissists who speak in clichés.

Did you catch the part about “lying advertisers”?

Aha. There’s the rub, O Gentle Reader.

Because sports is big business, all those televised games attract a tremendous amount of advertising, especially for things one not only does not need, but wouldn’t even bring up in polite conversation. This Sunday, while watching my beloved Dallas Cowboys lose a heartbreaker to their divisional arch-rivals, the hated New York Giants1, I wasn’t fast enough to hit the mute button on my remote to avoid the most recent pitch for a drug to cure impotence. (I suppose that for some people, sports is a proxy for other thrills. There is the element of machismo, after all.) The ad, which I cannot have seen fewer than five thousand times before, featured the bizarre image of a man and a woman lying in separate bathtubs in the great outdoors.

What the hell is that supposed to mean, anyway? What good is a sex enhancement medicine if you and your paramour are lounging in separate bathtubs? To take advantage of its desired effect, you’d have to climb out, wouldn’t you? And who in his right mind would take a bath in an outside bathtub anyway, where you’d not only be exposed to the ridicule of any passers-by, or even possibly arrested for indecent exposure by the long arm of the law, but also invite every errant mosquito to sample of your most intimate parts?

I don’t get it. But I did have something of a revelation.

There is yet one market for short fiction that thrives and pays top dollar: the thirty-second TV spot.

mrs-olsenThe earliest examples of the advertisement-as-drama that I remember from childhood involve coffee and a super-sugary breakfast cereal aimed at prepubescent consumers. I am referring, of course, to the sage Mrs. Olsen and the hapless Trix rabbit. If the Gentle Reader is not of a certain age, he may be forgiven for not knowing these particular paradigms, but I’m sure that others yet bearing aloft the advertising banner will come to mind, sans the slightest prompt.

trixI suspect that the advent of the adverdrama, to shamelessly coin a word, arose as fictionalized testimonials to the worthiness of products when actual testimonials failed to provide sufficient punch. Mrs. Olsen saved many a marriage, after all — before that, a good cup of coffee was only a beverage. The Trix rabbit informed children of their unique gastronomic niche, because Trix is for kids, and not for albino cartoon versions of Oryctolagus cuniculus, who as everyone knows should properly eat salad greens. As a child, I always found this gratuitous and cruel, but I was a sensitive soul in those days.

In the highest tradition of the Trix rabbit, many such single-act panderings are intended to be funny. They invariably portray imbeciles. I do not understand why the approbation of an imbecile is to be taken as a sound recommendation for a product, but maybe that’s just me.

Naturally this got me to wondering if I can’t somehow turn a rattling good crime story into a remunerative and endlessly repetitive TV spot. (Ads pay royalties every time they are aired, you know.) I can think of several good products to plug. Acme Arsenic, the Original Secret Ingredient! Our Saturday Night Special for that Special Someone! Necktie Party Ropes Won’t Leave You Hanging!

After all, ads for household insecticides have long championed the efficacy of the represented product as a means for murdering rational beings, albeit bugs. Charlie the Tuna had no stronger desire than to be dismembered and served as some psycho’s lunch. And lately we’ve even learned how to eliminate sentient warts and mucus.

Oh, who am I kidding? It’ll never fly. It runs too great a danger of elevating the moral tone of TV.

Yet my love for televised sports abideth. Yes, the Cowboys flamed out, but I still own an HDTV and the Dodgers are in a pennant race.

ethier

  1. “Hatedgiants”, like “Damnyankees”, is an indivisible single word in the Warren household, irrespective to the sport to which it is applied. [↩]
Posted in The Scribbler on September 21st, 2009
RSS 2.0 Both comments and pings are currently closed.

3 comments

  1. September 21st, 2009 at 1:35 pm, Dick Stodghill Says:

    This time I am ahead of you, having given up watching overpaid, under-talented prima donnas pretending to be Lou Gehrig or Joe Montana. However, while trying to find a babbling bimbo reading the news late Saturday afternoon I saw about thirty seconds of a Notre Dame football game. This brought memories of a game I covered 32 years ago so I rushed to the computer – actually it was the next day – and wrote a blog.
    I too have seen the couple taking baths in separate tubs a thousand or more times but keep watching in hope of seeing them stand up and have at it. My HMO doctor told me he was considering running a test on the product being advertised and thought I might make a good subject. I opted out, preferring a shower to a bath, and the test would be meaningless as we have only one tub.

  2. September 21st, 2009 at 3:52 pm, Deborah Says:

    If you call in within the next ten minutes, we’ll send a currently out-of-work mystery writer to detail methods for those people in your life who absolutely have no clue about anything.
    btw, I always wondered about the tub thing, too, then I thought: Wow, someone actually got paid to write this scenario! — So, it must make sense to someone…)

  3. September 21st, 2009 at 10:50 pm, Jeff Baker Says:

    Your assesment of current t.v. was, frankly, more charitable than it deserves. The bathtub thing reminds me of the days when Lucy and Ricky slept in separate beds!

« Sunday, September 20: The A.D.D. Detective Tuesday, September 22: Surprise Witness »

The Sidebar

  • Lex Artis

      Crippen & Landru
      Futures Mystery   Anthology   Magazine
      Homeville
      The Mystery   Place
      Short Mystery   Fiction Society
      The Strand   Magazine
  • Amicae Curiae

      J.F. Benedetto
      Jan Burke
      Bill Crider
      CrimeSpace
      Dave's Fiction   Warehouse
      Emerald City
      Martin Edwards
      The Gumshoe Site
      Michael Haskins
      _holm
      Killer Hobbies
      Miss Begotten
      Murderati
      Murderous Musings
      Mysterious   Issues
      MWA
      The Rap Sheet
      Sandra Seamans
      Sweet Home   Alameda
      Women of   Mystery
      Louis Willis
  • Filed Briefs

    • Bandersnatches (226)
    • De Novo Review (10)
    • Femme Fatale (224)
    • From the Gallery (3)
    • High-Heeled Gumshoe (151)
    • Miscellany (2)
    • Mississippi Mud (192)
    • Mystery Masterclass (91)
    • New York Minute (21)
    • Spirit of the Law (18)
    • Surprise Witness (46)
    • The A.D.D. Detective (228)
    • The Scribbler (204)
    • Tune It Or Die! (224)
  • Legal Archives

    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
Criminal Brief: The Mystery Short Story Web Log Project - Copyright 2011 by the respective authors. All rights reserved.
Opinions expressed are solely those of the author expressing them, and do not reflect the positions of CriminalBrief.com.