The Docket

  • MONDAY:

    The Scribbler

    James Lincoln Warren

  • MONDAY:

    Spirit of the Law

    Janice Law

  • TUESDAY:

    High-Heeled Gumshoe

    Melodie Johnson Howe

  • WEDNESDAY:

    Tune It Or Die!

    Robert Lopresti

  • THURSDAY:

    Femme Fatale

    Deborah
    Elliott-Upton

  • FRIDAY:

    Bander- snatches

    Steven Steinbock

  • SATURDAY:

    Mississippi Mud

    John M. Floyd

  • SATURDAY:

    New York Minute

    Angela Zeman

  • SUNDAY:

    The A.D.D. Detective

    Leigh Lundin

  • AD HOC:

    Mystery Masterclass

    Distinguished Guest Contributors

  • AD HOC:

    Surprise Witness

    Guest Blogger

  • Aural Argument

    "The Sack 'Em Up Men"

    "Crow's Avenue"

    "The Stain"

    "Jumpin' Jack Flash"

    "The Art of the Short Story"

    "Bouchercon 2010 Short Story Panel"

Tuesday, June 17: High-Heeled Gunshoe

REAL MEN? REAL WOMEN?

by Melodie Johnson Howe

Leigh’s last two columns got me thinking. When I was learning to write it never occurred to me that it would be difficult to write about men. At least not more difficult that it was to write about women. Jane Austin or Flaubert didn’t have a problem writing about the opposite sex. They observed, listened, and tried to capture both sexes on paper. After all, that is what writers do. We’re voyeurs staring in through the window at the party, or the lovemaking, or the fight, or the murder.

It is said that Fitzgerald was better at writing women than Hemingway. But it’s Hemingway’s women that stay in my mind. He wrote about women the way he saw them. Not the way he was supposed to see them. In The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber, the big game hunter Wilson ponders the female species:

“They are, he thought, the hardest in the world; the hardest, the cruelest, the most predatory and the most attractive and their men have softened or gone to pieces nervously as they have hardened. Or is it that they pick men they can handle? They can’t know that much at the age they marry, he thought. He was grateful that he had gone through his education on American women before now because this was a very attractive one.”

As a young college student I was appalled when I read that passage, especially the “predatory’ line. How could he call women that? American women! But when I finished the story I understood why. That’s a good writer. And to this day that passage has stayed with me. It is a dark reminder about women and men.

I have just finished reading a mystery by a very well-known male author. The women in the novel, good or evil, were okay. Nothing leapt out to offend me like that “predatory” line, but nothing leapt out to delight me. The female characters just weren’t that interesting. But they were by today standards — “real.”

A male author’s “real woman” is: she has sex when she wants. She can hold her own with a man, but still be vulnerable when necessary. She can usually shoot a gun, practice karate, and run to keep in shape. She rarely dresses up. Usually tank tops, jeans etc. She is smart and independent.

A female author’s “real woman” is: she has sex when she wants. She can hold her own with a man, but still be vulnerable when necessary. She can usually shoot a gun, practice karate, and run to keep in shape. She rarely dresses up. Usually tank tops, jeans etc. She is smart and independent. She worries about her weight, her mother or child and she talks more than her male counterpart.

Yes I generalize. We all have our favorite writers who rise far above the generic. But I find most do not.

1
I am going to speak immodestly so stop reading if conceit offends you. I was a beautiful young woman. And what I learned being beautiful is that many men were afraid of me. They didn’t want the attention I brought. One man told me that he couldn’t go out with me again because he wanted to punch out the other guys who were ogling me. His problem? Of course. But an interesting one. Did that make him a Neanderthal? Today it would. But he was in his own way letting me know how intimidated he was by being with me.

Leigh wrote about the good looking guy bedding all the beauties and then marrying, quit happily, the plain Jane. I loved that story. It has a bitter sweet truth to it. I also like what Leigh said about a woman for every man. Men like women whether they’re fat, thin, blonde, gray, tall or short. Men like women. Men need women. They may need them more than women need men. And in all honesty having been there and done that, I think men desire everyday normal average women more than they desire the great beauties.

I also discovered that men can be confused by beauty when it’s combined with intellect or a sharp wit. What did my husband say, “Brutal brain?” Most men would greet me by staring at my body then slowly arrive at my face. By the time they got to my face they were geared up to respond to me in a certain way. When I got them in conversation they had to readjust. They had to think. Here’s a big secret: men do not adjust easily. Quite a few have excused themselves and walked away from me rather than adjust. Maybe they only wanted to hit on me, and not banter. Sexism? Fear? Loathing? Who knows? But it’s great stuff to explore. It’s not generic.

I long to be offended as I was in Hemingway’s short story. I long to be delighted. As writers we need to be more daring with our male and female characters. Maybe as daring as those writers who wrote in pre-feminist times.

  1. This illustration was my idea, and not Melodie’s. When I add an illustration to a contributor’s article, I usually ask the contributor if he or she approves, and if not, I remove it. Melodie was a justifiably concerned that this old movie poster might make her look silly, and might be interpreted as being self-serving, but then said, “Oh, what the hell, use it. It makes my point in an odd way,” which I think is dead on target. But if it violates good taste, the blame is mine. —JLW [↩]
Posted in High-Heeled Gumshoe on June 17th, 2008
RSS 2.0 Both comments and pings are currently closed.

4 comments

  1. June 17th, 2008 at 6:07 pm, Leigh Says:

    I should have asked you to co-author my series with me, Melodie. (In thruth, I have about 30 informal co-authors now.)

    You and I wrote about the opposite sex from the opposite PoV because (a) we didn’t know we weren’t supposed to and (b) we had sufficient ‘method’ necessities for it not to be unnatural.

    Although I like to think I’m warm and polite to anyone regardless of looks, in self-honesty I’ve tended to be quite cool to exceptionally good-looking women, what I’d come to think of as ‘not feeding the monster’. Looking back, I realize I was forcing them to ‘prove’ they were not egotistical and self-involved. To my surprise, I discovered that some saw this as a challenge. Sometimes we get better than we deserve and that’s what happened to me. Over time, I ended up as friends with some and dated a couple of the girls. I think this came about because I didn’t give away my admiration –or– they didn’t mind my being a jerk.

    Yes, there a few ‘hot button’ physical attributes that get to me, but given a choice between a pretty face and an interesting face, I go for interesting, because often it rests atop beauty.

  2. June 18th, 2008 at 1:42 am, Travis Erwin Says:

    Very interesting take. Now you’ve got be puzzling over how I write women.

  3. June 18th, 2008 at 2:05 am, Melodie Johnson Howe Says:

    Travis,

    Don’t puzzle. Write how your character or you (the author)see women. Not how you think you should see them. It’s fiction. It’s artifice. It only needs to work in your story. Dare.

  4. June 18th, 2008 at 2:24 pm, Deborah Elliott-Upton Says:

    It is safe to say you are still a beautiful young woman. (Age is a relative factor for us all.) A male friend once asked me if I thought we change as we grow older. I said, “I think we evolve.”

« Monday, June 16: The Scribbler Wednesday, June 18: Tune It or Die! »

The Sidebar

  • Lex Artis

      Crippen & Landru
      Futures Mystery   Anthology   Magazine
      Homeville
      The Mystery   Place
      Short Mystery   Fiction Society
      The Strand   Magazine
  • Amicae Curiae

      J.F. Benedetto
      Jan Burke
      Bill Crider
      CrimeSpace
      Dave's Fiction   Warehouse
      Emerald City
      Martin Edwards
      The Gumshoe Site
      Michael Haskins
      _holm
      Killer Hobbies
      Miss Begotten
      Murderati
      Murderous Musings
      Mysterious   Issues
      MWA
      The Rap Sheet
      Sandra Seamans
      Sweet Home   Alameda
      Women of   Mystery
      Louis Willis
  • Filed Briefs

    • Bandersnatches (226)
    • De Novo Review (10)
    • Femme Fatale (224)
    • From the Gallery (3)
    • High-Heeled Gumshoe (151)
    • Miscellany (2)
    • Mississippi Mud (192)
    • Mystery Masterclass (91)
    • New York Minute (21)
    • Spirit of the Law (18)
    • Surprise Witness (46)
    • The A.D.D. Detective (228)
    • The Scribbler (204)
    • Tune It Or Die! (224)
  • Legal Archives

    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
Criminal Brief: The Mystery Short Story Web Log Project - Copyright 2011 by the respective authors. All rights reserved.
Opinions expressed are solely those of the author expressing them, and do not reflect the positions of CriminalBrief.com.