Monday, October 4: The Scribbler
PHONING IT IN
by James Lincoln Warren
I read a novel last week by a best-selling mystery writer, which I found myself not liking very much. In keeping with my invariable practice of not criticizing living writers, since I begrudge no writer his success, I will withhold the author’s name, but the problem with the book is amply illustrated by the title of this week’s Scribbler.
Not even the ring tone was original. I wrote about my take on the book to a friend and realized I couldn’t even remember its title without reading it on the front cover. You can’t get much more forgettable than that.
What’s a writer to do when things get stale? Especially wildly successful things?
There are two common solutions, both inadequate as far as I’m concerned.
First, you can phone it in, like this book. This means writing your last story over again but changing the names. Telling the same story all over again isn’t necessarily a bad thing. My friend claimed that James Lee Burke, who is surely a giant in the genre and one of the best-loved men in the crime fiction community, has been doing it for years. But somehow a new James Lee Burke is always worth reading. Maybe it’s because you don’t really read JLB for the story, but for the power of the prose.
Allow me to analogize. (Really? Warren analogizing? He’s doing it again.)
The Gentle Reader may recall that I’m a big time classical music junkie. In late-19th century Germany and Austria, there was a famous rivalry between Richard Wagner and Johannes Brahms. This was slightly mitigated by the fact that Wagner never wrote symphonies and Brahms never wrote operas.
But one of Wagner’s disciples, Anton Bruckner, was every inch a symphonist. He wrote two symphonies, now numbered “No. 0” and “No. 00”, before actually offering up his “Symphony No. 1”. He then wrote eight more.
Brahms only wrote four symphonies. Brahms’ symphonies are each unique, very different from each other, every one a masterpiece. Bruckner’s symphonies, although all wonderful and epic and justifiably still played, have a certain undeniable uniformity.
One of my friends, who loved Bruckner, told me, “Brahms waited until he was forty to write his First Symphony, which was perfect, and then wrote three more perfect symphonies. Bruckner wrote his First Symphony at forty-two, and then rewrote it eight times.”
I mentioned this to another friend, an even fiercer Bruckner partisan, who bristled at the comment. “That’s not true! Bruckner did not write the same symphony nine times! He wrote the same symphony eleven times!”
Bruckner’s symphonies are all very complex and dense, and took a long time to write. Before Beethoven, composers were much more prolific and had no trouble recycling material when they got lazy. As one of Margaret’s professors, the late eminent Johnson Scholar Donald Greene, told her, “Life is too short for Vivaldi.”1
In fine, while there may be nothing wrong with trying to crack a problem from different angles, there is a problem when you crack the same problem the same way several times in a row.
But moving on. The second method is to apply out-of-the-box thinking. This also usually goes wildly wrong. For example, when one of my cats solves a problem out of the box, there’s usually some cleanup involved. (Now you know why I hate that expression “out of the box.” Take away one of the walls and the roof can fall down.) But I digress. (Really? Warren digressing? He’s doing it again.)
In Hollywood, this leads to the phenomenon known as jumping the shark, from an episode of Happy Days that attempted to resuscitate sagging ratings by having the Fonz perform a motorcycle stunt over a pool containing a man-eating fish. Aside from being excruciatingly dumb, this was not very consistent with the show’s originally nostalgic premise, and was accurately seen as the show’s death knell. More recently, we’ve had nuking the fridge, a direct reference to Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, where Indiana Jones survives a nuclear blast by taking refuge in a lead-lined refrigerator. The refrigerator inexplicably is not reduced to atoms but is blown several miles from ground zero, with Indy tumbling inside without being reduced to purée of archaeologist. This sounds pretty ridiculous, and it is pretty ridiculous, but it was actually pretty consistent with Indiana Jones’s previous adventures. I mean, how exactly did Indy stow away on the outside of a German submarine in Raiders of the Lost Ark without drowning? Just a little over the top.
I don’t think I’m as good as James Lee Burke, so if I ever start to phone it in or jump the shark, will you, my Gentle Readers, stop me before I kill again?
Phoning it in is like phone sex. Phony.
So I guess if I ever do go stale and have to change things up, I probably shouldn’t switch to romance.
- I might add that among other Things the World Does Not Need are more recordings of Vivaldi’s The Four Seasons, Carl Orff’s Carmina Burana, and Gustav Holst’s The Planets, all of which I love, but give it a rest. [↩]